VESPER 1.5 - spatial prediction software for precision agriculture.

VESPER 1.5 is a shareware software program, written to provide rigourous spatial prediction techniques for the precision agriculture industry. It offers a range of options to deal with data sets of varying data density, spatial distribution, and observation uncertainty. Such data sets are now gathered from a range of realtime yield, soil and crop sensors and through manual sampling regimes. Specifically, the program provides the flexibility to calculate global and local variogram models, undertake global and local kriging in either punctual or block form and output the parameters and estimates in an ASCII text format. The program provides control of the semivariogram calculation and choice of models that may be fit to the input data. A boundary and prediction grid may be generated in the software or supplied as an external file. VEPSER 1.5 allows user defined neighbourhood and prediction-block sizes, along with a number of more advanced controls. It provides a real-time graphical display of the semivariogram modeling and a progress (and final) map of the kriged estimates. The value of the local variogram/kriging process in dealing with data sets generated for precision agriculture operations is shown here with a statistical comparison of the standard prediction techniques over a 100ha field. A comparison using a small portion (~1ha) of another field is also provided to illustrate both the visual impact of each technique and introduce the benefits block kriging of estimates brings to many of these data sets. Having the ability to tailor the prediction process to individual data sets is essential for Precision Agriculture (PA) where data quantity, density and measurement quality varies.

[1]  Thomas S. Colvin,et al.  Grain Yield Mapping: Yield Sensing, Yield Reconstruction, and Errors , 2002, Precision Agriculture.

[2]  D. Weber,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators II , 1992 .

[3]  C. Gotway,et al.  Comparison of kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters , 1996 .

[4]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Comparison of several spatial prediction methods for soil pH , 1987 .

[5]  Dennis Weber,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators , 1992 .

[6]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Limitations on the spatial resolution of yield mapping for combinable crops , 1997 .

[7]  Alex. B. McBratney,et al.  A Parametric Transfer Function for Grain-Flow Within a Conventional Combine Harvester , 2002, Precision Agriculture.

[8]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  The performance of spatial interpolation methods and choropleth maps to estimate properties at points: a soil survey case study. , 1996 .

[9]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  The design of optimal sampling schemes for local estimation and mapping of of regionalized variables—I: Theory and method , 1981 .

[10]  Evan J. Englund,et al.  The effects of sampling design parameters on block selection , 1992 .

[11]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[12]  Brett Whelan,et al.  Prediction Uncertainty and Implications For Digital Map Resolution , 1999 .

[13]  R. Webster,et al.  Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. II. Block kriging. , 1980 .

[14]  M. Clayton,et al.  Mapping Soil Test Phosphorus and Potassium for Variable‐Rate Fertilizer Application , 1994 .

[15]  R. V. Rossel,et al.  Spatial prediction for precision agriculture , 1996 .

[16]  T. C. Haas,et al.  Kriging and automated variogram modeling within a moving window , 1990 .

[17]  P. C. Robert,et al.  Yield Mapping — A Guide to Improved Techniques and Strategies , 1995 .

[18]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Geographical data modeling , 1992 .