Transparent Rate Mode Bilateral Teleoperation Control

Transparent teleoperation under rate mode has proven to be difficult in terms of stability, performance and implementation. This is mainly due to the need for an exchange of derivative and integral of measured positions and forces which make transparent rate mode controllers prone to noise and abrupt contact force changes. Moreover, the performance of controllers declines in the presence of communication delays. This paper proposes two control architectures based on the use of local force feedback (LFF) and environment impedance reflection (EIR). The LFF controllers eliminate a force channel while preserving transparency under ideal conditions. In the EIR controller, the identified impedance of the environment is employed in the master controller to predict the slave position and contact force derivatives. The stability robustness and performance of these controllers are evaluated and compared to those of a benchmark controller under different operational conditions, such as noise and delay, using analytical methods and experimental results.

[1]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Application of force feedback to heavy duty hydraulic machines , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Wayne J. Book,et al.  Evaluation of a Teleoperated Haptic Forklift , 2005, AIM 2005.

[3]  Ming Zhu,et al.  Coordinated and Force-Feedback Control of Hydraulic Excavators , 1995, ISER.

[4]  Ralph L. Hollis,et al.  Design and control of a force-reflecting teleoperation system with magnetically levitated master and wrist , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Ming Zhu,et al.  Transparent Bilateral Teleoperation under Position and Rate Control , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  A comparison of position and rate control for telemanipulations with consideration of manipulator system dynamics , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Wayne J. Book,et al.  Position/Rate Haptic Control of a Hydraulic Forklift , 2003 .

[8]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Bilateral control of master-slave manipulators for ideal kinesthetic coupling-formulation and experiment , 1994, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  Daniel W. Repperger,et al.  Evaluation of Rate-Based, Force-Reflecting Teleoperation in Free Motion and Contact , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Transparency in time-delayed systems and the effect of local force feedback for transparent teleoperation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Adaptive identification and control for manipulators without using joint accelerations , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[13]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Controlling impedance at the man/machine interface , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Analysis of Control Architectures for Teleoperation Systems with Impedance/Admittance Master and Slave Manipulators , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[15]  Simon Richir,et al.  The "Bubble" technique: interacting with large virtual environments using haptic devices with limited workspace , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[16]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Sensor-based space robotics-ROTEX and its telerobotic features , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Robust control of dynamically interacting systems , 1988 .

[18]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Pseudo-admittance Bilateral Telemanipulation with Guidance Virtual Fixtures , 2007 .

[19]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  A design framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[20]  T. H. Hunt A comparative study of system identification techniques in the presence of parameter variation, noise, and data anomalies , 1996, Proceedings of the 39th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems.