Organization Promises in the Triangular Psychological Contract as Perceived by Temporary Agency Workers, Agencies, and Client Organizations

Temporary agency blue-collar workers (N = 100), the agencies through which they were hired (N = 12), and the client organizations to which they were assigned to work (N = 11) reported their perceptions on the content and the fulfillment or breach of organization promises within the psychological contract. All data were collected in Belgium through a survey from fall 2002 through spring 2003.Nonparametric tests and t-tests indicated similarity rather than discrepancy in the parties’ perceptions. Fulfillment of the psychological contract was the case rather than breach. When focusing on differences, agencies and client organizations perceived more promises made than their temporaries did. Agencies and client organizations had more favorable perceptions of their promises kept than their temporaries did. The temporaries perceived more promises made by their agencies than by their client organizations.

[1]  Lois E. Tetrick,et al.  The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship. , 1994 .

[2]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  Scott W. Lester,et al.  The Impact of Psychological Contract Fulfillment on the Performance of In-Role and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors , 2003 .

[4]  H. Witte,et al.  Het psychologisch contract van vaste en tijdelijke werknemers , 2002 .

[5]  C. L. Cooper,et al.  Handbook of Work and Health Psychology , 2003 .

[6]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts , 1990 .

[7]  Sandra L. Robinson,et al.  Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior , 1995 .

[8]  Daniel C. Feldman,et al.  Managing temporary workers: A permanent HRM challenge , 1994 .

[9]  D. Rousseau Psychological and implied contracts in organizations , 1989 .

[10]  Neil Conway,et al.  The Psychological Contract, Health and Well‐Being , 2004 .

[11]  Judi McLean Parks,et al.  I pledge thee my troth … contingently: commitment and the contingent work relationship , 2001 .

[12]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  CHANGING OBLIGATIONS AND THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 1994 .

[13]  Janet H. Marler,et al.  Boundaryless and traditional contingent employees: worlds apart , 2002 .

[14]  Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro,et al.  Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: a large scale survey , 2000 .

[15]  D. Guest Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously , 1998 .

[16]  D. Rousseau Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract , 2001 .

[17]  Deborah E. Rupp,et al.  Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level , 2002 .

[18]  Abigail Marks,et al.  Developing a multiple foci conceptualization of the psychological contract , 2001 .

[19]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm , 1994 .

[20]  E. Morrison,et al.  THE EMPLOYEE-ORGANIZATION RELATIONSHIP: A TIMELY CONCEPT IN A PERIOD OF TRANSITION , 2004 .

[21]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  The dual commitments of contingent workers: an examination of contingents' commitment to the agency and the organization , 2003 .

[22]  C. Forde,et al.  The nature and experience of agency working in Britain , 2006 .

[23]  D. Rousseau,et al.  The Interim Manager: Prototype of the 21 st-Century Worker? , 2001 .

[24]  Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro,et al.  New developments in the employee–organization relationship , 2003 .

[25]  S. Robinson Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract , 1996 .

[26]  Janet Druker,et al.  Mutual Expectations: A Study of the Three-Way Relationship between Employment Agencies, Their Client Organisations and White-Collar Agency 'Temps' , 2004 .

[27]  N. Conway,et al.  Full-Time versus Part-Time Employees: Understanding the Links between Work Status, the Psychological Contract, and Attitudes , 2002 .

[28]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Psychological contracts in organizations , 1995 .

[29]  W. H. Turnley,et al.  Empowerment, expectations, and the psychological contract—managing the dilemmas and gaining the advantages , 2000 .

[30]  Neil Conway,et al.  Communicating the psychological contract: an employer perspective , 2002 .

[31]  N. Anderson,et al.  The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect , 1998 .

[32]  Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro,et al.  Exploring reciprocity through the lens of the psychological contract: Employee and employer perspectives , 2002 .

[33]  Sandra L. Robinson,et al.  The development of psychological contract breach and violation: a longitudinal study , 2000 .

[34]  M. Taylor,et al.  Aren't there two parties in an employment relationship? Antecedents and consequences of organization–employee agreement on contract obligations and violations , 2003 .

[35]  Daniel C. Feldman,et al.  The Impact of Psychological Contract Violations on Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect , 1999 .

[36]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  G. Davidov Joint Employer Status in Triangular Employment Relationships , 2004 .

[38]  Judi McLean Parks,et al.  Fitting square pegs into round holes: mapping the domain of contingent work arrangements onto the psychological contract , 1998 .

[39]  A. Kalleberg Nonstandard Employment Relations: Part-time, Temporary and Contract Work , 2000 .