Strategy, networks and systems in the global translation services market

The globalisation of markets has led to an increased demand for language translation services that support and enable communication between economic partners. For example, technical documents, software systems, business documents and web sites all need to be translated into multiple languages for individual national markets, and the information that they contain changes periodically. This paper sets out a theoretical framework that describes the architectures of business processes within and between separate firms that are used to support the delivery and management of services. This is done by coordinating the fit between externally generated problem complexity, from customers, and the internally generated complexity of different potential network configuration solutions. The theoretical framework is an architecture of how complexity is generated and managed at the different structural levels and across the different processual stages of an industry. A case study of thebigword, a major international translation services company, illustrates how the framework is applied in practice. The case study analyses the implementation of an electronic market platform which enables the coordination of the different stakeholders involved in the translation services market. These stakeholders include translators, translation services companies and their clients in a global business network.

[1]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[2]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[3]  C. Kindleberger.  Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods , 1983 .

[4]  Ellen Christiaanse,et al.  A Multilevel Analysis of eHub Adoption and Consequences , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[5]  Allen S. Lee.  A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..

[6]  M. Augier,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision‐Making Processes in Administrative Organizations , 2002 .

[7]  Christopher P. Holland,et al.  Mixed Mode Network Structures: The Strategic Use of Electronic Communication by Organizations , 1997 .

[8]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[9]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Organizations , 2006 .

[10]  Jan Venselaar,et al.  DESIGN RULES , 1999 .

[11]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[12]  Ravi Kalakota,et al.  Services Blueprint: Roadmap for Execution , 2003 .

[13]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[14]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Global Information Technology Outsourcing: In Search of Business Advantage , 2001 .

[15]  Christopher P. Holland,et al.  BP's multi-enterprise asset management system , 2005, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[16]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[17]  R. Langlois,et al.  Standards, Modularity, and Innovation: The Case of Medical Practice , 1997 .

[18]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[19]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Managing in the modular age : architectures, networks, and organizations , 2002 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[21]  Timothy M. Devinney,et al.  Modular Strategies: B2B Technology and Architectural Knowledge , 2005 .

[22]  Christopher P. Holland,et al.  Cooperative supply chain management: the impact of interorganizational information systems , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[24]  D. L. Parnas,et al.  On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules , 1972, Software Pioneers.

[25]  R. Langlois.  Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[26]  Christopher P. Holland,et al.  Marketing translation services internationally: exploiting IT to achieve a smart network , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[28]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[29]  Ellen Christiaanse,et al.  A process-stakeholder analysis of B2B industry standardisation , 2007, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[30]  R. Yin.  Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[31]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[32]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Bounded Rationality and the Search for Organizational Architecture: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Design of Organizations and Their Evolvability , 2004 .

[33]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[34]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Information technology and the transformation of industries: three research perspectives , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The power of modularity , 2000 .

[36]  Marie-France Turcotte,et al.  Path dependence and path creation: Framing the extra‐financial information market for a sustainable trajectory , 2009 .

[37]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.