Estimation of Arctic Basin-Scale Sea Ice Thickness From Satellite Passive Microwave Measurements

Retrievals of sea ice thickness from passive microwave measurements have been limited to thin ice because microwaves penetrate at most the upper 50 cm of sea ice. To overcome such a limitation, a method of retrieving Arctic basin-scale ice thickness is developed. The physical background of this method is that the scattering optical thickness at microwave frequencies within the freeboard layer is linearly proportional to the physical thickness of the ice freeboard. In this study, we relate the optical thickness estimated from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) with ice freeboard estimated from the CryoSat-2 (CS2) by employing a piecewise linear fit. The results show a strong linear relationship between the AMSR2-estimated and CS2-measured ice freeboards with a correlation coefficient of 0.85 and bias and RMSE of 0.0001 and 0.04 m, respectively; this evidence suggests that the method can provide Arctic basin-scale ice freeboard with a comparable accuracy level of CS2. The method is also applied to estimate ice freeboard for the periods of the Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (SMMR) (1978–1987) and AMSR-E (2002–2011). It is shown that the area-averaged ice freeboard has decreased significantly with the linear trends of 1.5 cm/decade. In addition, there seems to be a change of ice freeboard distributions over the Arctic. Furthermore, the algorithm is extended to the ice thickness retrieval by using the hydrostatic balance equation, showing that operational basin-scale ice thickness retrieval will be possible from satellite passive microwave measurements if a realistic snow depth on sea ice is employed.

[1]  J. Wallace,et al.  Variations in the age of Arctic sea‐ice and summer sea‐ice extent , 2004 .

[2]  W. Meier,et al.  The Arctic's sea ice cover: trends, variability, predictability, and comparisons to the Antarctic , 2018, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  R. Kwok.  Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage: losses and coupled variability (1958–2018) , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[4]  Vladimir F. Radionov,et al.  Snow Depth on Arctic Sea Ice , 1999 .

[5]  Seong-Joong Kim,et al.  Differentiating between first‐year and multiyear sea ice in the Arctic using microwave‐retrieved ice emissivities , 2017 .

[6]  Christian Kummerow,et al.  Long-Term Arctic Snow/Ice Interface Temperature from Special Sensor for Microwave Imager Measurements , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[7]  Jeffrey R. Key,et al.  Arctic sea ice in transformation: A review of recent observed changes and impacts on biology and human activity , 2014 .

[8]  G. Dybkjær,et al.  Simulations of the snow covered sea ice surface temperature and microwave effective temperature , 2011 .

[9]  Michael Studinger,et al.  An Improved CryoSat-2 Sea Ice Freeboard Retrieval Algorithm Through the Use of Waveform Fitting , 2014 .

[10]  J. C. Comiso,et al.  Sea ice effective microwave emissivities from satellite passive microwave and infrared observations , 1983 .

[11]  Cecilia M. Bitz,et al.  Polar amplification dominated by local forcing and feedbacks , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[12]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice, Atmosphere, Ocean, and Land , 2002 .

[13]  A. Wiesmann,et al.  Microwave Emission Model of Layered Snowpacks , 1999 .

[14]  R. Barry,et al.  Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: A research synthesis , 2011 .

[15]  Christian Mätzler,et al.  Thermal Microwave Radiation: Applications for Remote Sensing , 2006 .

[16]  Mark A. Tschudi,et al.  Relating the Age of Arctic Sea Ice to its Thickness, as Measured during NASA's ICESat and IceBridge Campaigns , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[17]  P. Beckmann,et al.  The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces , 1963 .

[18]  Thorsten Markus,et al.  Sea ice concentration, ice temperature, and snow depth using AMSR-E data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  R. Kwok,et al.  The thinning of Arctic sea ice , 2011 .

[20]  B. Sohn,et al.  Impact of Ice Surface and Volume Scatterings on the Microwave Sea Ice Apparent Emissivity , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[21]  B. Sohn,et al.  Retrieving the refractive index, emissivity, and surface temperature of polar sea ice from 6.9 GHz microwave measurements: A theoretical development , 2015 .

[22]  G. Dybkjær,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of wintertime sea ice thickness and snow depth from space-borne freeboard measurements , 2020 .

[23]  Vassilios Makios,et al.  The complex‐dielectric constant of sea ice at frequencies in the range 0.1–40 GHz , 1978 .

[24]  S. Warren,et al.  Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the microwave: A revised compilation , 2008 .

[25]  P. Bauer,et al.  Satellite Data Simulator Unit: A Multisensor, Multispectral Satellite Simulator Package , 2010 .

[26]  A. Lang,et al.  Sea ice thickness and recent Arctic warming , 2017 .

[27]  M. Webster,et al.  Arctic Snow Depth and Sea Ice Thickness From ICESat‐2 and CryoSat‐2 Freeboards: A First Examination , 2020 .

[28]  Nizy Mathew,et al.  Surface Emissivity of the Arctic Sea Ice at AMSR-E Frequencies , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Malcolm Davidson,et al.  CryoSat‐2 estimates of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume , 2013 .

[30]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  Snow thickness retrieval over thick Arctic sea ice using SMOS satellite data , 2013 .

[31]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .