Randomness and pattern scale in the immune network

The immune system is a beautiful example of a complex information processing system. The complexity of the immune system is comparable to that of the nervous system. Both systems are comprised of a large number of different cell types communicating via the production of stimulatory or inhibitory molecules. Several of these cell types form connected networks of billions of different nodes. In the neural network the nodes are fixed and communicate via electrical signals; in the immune system the nodes recirculate and communicate via molecules (e. g. , antibody) or cell-to-cell contacts. An important property of both systems is "learning". During its early life the immune system learns to discriminate between self and nonself. Additionally, the immune system has a form memory which is known as "immunity": secondary immune responses are usually different from primary responses.

[1]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Spiral wave structure in pre-biotic evolution: hypercycles stable against parasites , 1991 .

[2]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[3]  A. Perelson,et al.  Size and connectivity as emergent properties of a developing immune network. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  P. Hogeweg Cellular automata as a paradigm for ecological modeling , 1988 .

[5]  A S Perelson,et al.  Pattern formation in one- and two-dimensional shape-space models of the immune system. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  Jerne Nk Towards a network theory of the immune system. , 1974 .

[7]  Gérard Weisbuch,et al.  Window automata analysis of population dynamics in the immune system. , 1992 .

[8]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Universality and complexity in cellular automata , 1983 .

[9]  G. Oster,et al.  Theoretical studies of clonal selection: minimal antibody repertoire size and reliability of self-non-self discrimination. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Tommaso Toffoli,et al.  Cellular automata machines - a new environment for modeling , 1987, MIT Press series in scientific computation.

[11]  A. Coutinho,et al.  Beyond Clonal Selection and Network , 1989, Immunological reviews.

[12]  F. Varela,et al.  Morphogenesis in shape-space. Elementary meta-dynamics in a model of the immune network. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  D. Holmberg,et al.  Establishment and Functional Implications of B‐cell Connectivity , 1989, Immunological reviews.

[14]  G. Weisbuch,et al.  A shape space approach to the dynamics of the immune system. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  S. Avrameas,et al.  Natural autoantibodies: from 'horror autotoxicus' to 'gnothi seauton'. , 1991, Immunology today.

[16]  J. Tyson,et al.  A cellular automation model of excitable media including curvature and dispersion. , 1990, Science.

[17]  R. J. de Boer,et al.  Recent developments in idiotypic network theory , 1991 .

[18]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Recent approaches to immune networks , 1993 .

[19]  Robbert Benner,et al.  Isotypes and specificities of immunoglobulins produced by germ‐free mice fed chemically defined ultrafiltered “antigen‐free” diet , 1984, European journal of immunology.