MR Spectroscopy-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction Is Superior to Controlled Attenuation Parameter for Detecting and Grading Hepatic Steatosis.

Purpose To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) obtained with transient elastography and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) obtained with proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy with results of liver biopsy in a cohort of adult patients suspected of having nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved this study. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The authors evaluated 55 patients suspected of having NAFLD (40 men, 15 women). Patients had a median age of 52.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 43.7-57.6 years) and a median body mass index of 27.8 kg/m2 (IQR, 26.0-33.1 kg/m2). CAP and PDFF measurements were obtained on the same day, within 27 days of biopsy (IQR, 7-44 days). CAP and PDFF were compared between steatosis grades by using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test. Diagnostic accuracies of CAP and PDFF for grading steatosis were assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Within-weeks reproducibility (CAP and PDFF) and within-session repeatability were assessed with linear regression analyses, intraclass correlation coefficients, and coefficients of variation. Results Steatosis grades at liver biopsy were distributed as follows: S0, five patients; S1, 24 patients; S2, 17 patients; and S3, nine patients. Both PDFF and CAP helped detect histologically proven steatosis (≥S1), but PDFF showed better diagnostic accuracy than CAP in terms of the area under the ROC curve (0.99 vs 0.77, respectively; P = .0334). PDFF, but not CAP, enabled the grading of steatosis (P < .0001). For within-weeks reproducibility, the intraclass correlation coefficient with PDFF was higher than that with CAP (0.95 vs 0.65, respectively; P = .0015); coefficients of variation were similar (19% vs 11%, P = .55). Within-session repeatability of CAP was good, with a coefficient of variation of 4.5%. Conclusion MR spectroscopy-derived PDFF is superior to CAP in detecting and grading liver steatosis in human NAFLD. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

[1]  A. Pollett,et al.  Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP): a noninvasive method for the detection of hepatic steatosis based on transient elastography , 2012, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[2]  Patrice Cacoub,et al.  Meta-analyses of FibroTest diagnostic value in chronic liver disease , 2007, BMC gastroenterology.

[3]  F. Oberti,et al.  Learning curve and interobserver reproducibility evaluation of liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography , 2008, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[4]  E. Yoshida,et al.  Patient preference and willingness to pay for transient elastography versus liver biopsy: A perspective from British Columbia. , 2015, Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[5]  Joan Tordjman,et al.  Histopathological algorithm and scoring system for evaluation of liver lesions in morbidly obese patients , 2012, Hepatology.

[6]  Tanya Wolfson,et al.  Reproducibility of MR‐based liver fat quantification across field strength: Same‐day comparison between 1.5T and 3T in obese subjects , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  J. Hoogduin,et al.  Reproducibility of 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance spectroscopy for measuring hepatic fat content , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  T. Berg,et al.  Non-Invasive Assessment of Hepatic Steatosis in Patients with NAFLD Using Controlled Attenuation Parameter and 1H-MR Spectroscopy , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Li Ying,et al.  Controlled attenuation parameter for the detection of steatosis severity in chronic liver disease: A meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy , 2014, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[10]  Dario Conte,et al.  Reproducibility of transient elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease , 2007, Gut.

[11]  J. Vergniol,et al.  Non‐invasive diagnosis of liver steatosis using controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and transient elastography , 2012, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[12]  T. Yamanaka,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging More Accurately Classifies Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Than Transient Elastography. , 2016, Gastroenterology.

[13]  A. Gamst,et al.  Reproducibility of MRI‐determined proton density fat fraction across two different MR scanner platforms , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  R. Idilman,et al.  Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy. , 2013, Radiology.

[15]  J. Stoker,et al.  Quantitative determination of liver triglyceride levels with 3T ¹H-MR spectroscopy in mice with moderately elevated liver fat content. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[16]  M. Ziol,et al.  Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  G. Bedogni,et al.  Liver stiffness is influenced by a standardized meal in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus at different stages of fibrotic evolution , 2013, Hepatology.

[18]  J. Stoker,et al.  Noninvasive Differentiation between Hepatic Steatosis and Steatohepatitis with MR Imaging Enhanced with USPIOs in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study. , 2016, Radiology.

[19]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. , 2011, Journal of hepatology.

[20]  S. Grundy,et al.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic triglyceride content: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the general population. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[21]  Brian W. Anthony,et al.  Quantitative Hepatic Fat Quantification in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Using Ultrasound-Based Techniques: A Review of Literature and Their Diagnostic Performance. , 2018, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  Paul Calès,et al.  Sources of variability in histological scoring of chronic viral hepatitis , 2005, Hepatology.

[23]  B. Neuschwander‐Tetri,et al.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score and the histopathologic diagnosis in NAFLD: distinct clinicopathologic meanings , 2011, Hepatology.

[24]  M. Friedrich-Rust,et al.  Comparison of ELF, FibroTest and FibroScan for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis , 2010, BMC gastroenterology.

[25]  A. Gamst,et al.  Accuracy of MR imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction for classification of dichotomized histologic steatosis grades in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. , 2015, Radiology.

[26]  A. Gamst,et al.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. , 2013, Radiology.

[27]  B. Bell,et al.  A comparison of hepatopathologists' and community pathologists' review of liver biopsy specimens from patients with hepatitis C. , 2009, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[28]  S. Reeder,et al.  Validation of MRI biomarkers of hepatic steatosis in the presence of iron overload in the ob/ob mouse , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  V. de Lédinghen,et al.  Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a novel VCTE™ guided ultrasonic attenuation measurement for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis: preliminary study and validation in a cohort of patients with chronic liver disease from various causes. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[30]  Rohit Loomba,et al.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging versus histology for quantifying changes in liver fat in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease trials , 2013, Hepatology.

[31]  Mithat Gönen,et al.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers: A review of statistical methods for technical performance assessment , 2015, Statistical methods in medical research.

[32]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[33]  J. Stoker,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis , 2010, European Radiology.