Female reproductive plasticity to the social environment and its impact on male reproductive success

[1]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Pleistocene origins of chorusing diversity in Mediterranean bush-cricket populations (Ephippiger diurnus) , 2019, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.

[2]  E. Hebets,et al.  Mate Choice and Learning , 2019, Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior.

[3]  B. Sadd,et al.  A dynamic threshold model for terminal investment , 2017, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  G. Höbel,et al.  Describing mate preference functions and other function‐valued traits , 2017, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[5]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  When do acoustic cues matter? Perceived competition and reproductive plasticity over lifespan in a bushcricket , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  J. Evans,et al.  The total opportunity for sexual selection and the integration of pre‐ and post‐mating episodes of sexual selection in a complex world , 2016, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[7]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Animal choruses emerge from receiver psychology , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Female preference functions drive interpopulation divergence in male signalling: call diversity in the bushcricket Ephippiger diurnus , 2016, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[9]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  Males adjust their signalling behaviour according to experience of male signals and male–female signal duets , 2016, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[10]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Acoustic experience influences male and female pre- and postcopulatory behaviors in a bushcricket , 2016 .

[11]  R. Nager,et al.  Paternal attractiveness and the effects of differential allocation of parental investment , 2016, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Reproduction and immunity trade-offs constrain mating signals and nuptial gift size in a bushcricket , 2016 .

[13]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Amino acid composition of the bushcricket spermatophore and the function of courtship feeding: Variable composition suggests a dynamic role of the nuptial gift , 2015, Physiology & Behavior.

[14]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Group synchrony and alternation as an emergent property: elaborate chorus structure in a bushcricket is an incidental by-product of female preference for leading calls , 2015, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  Orr Spiegel,et al.  Natal dispersal in a social landscape: Considering individual behavioral phenotypes and social environment in dispersal ecology , 2015 .

[16]  M. Zuk,et al.  Cricket Responses to Sexual Signals are Influenced More by Adult than Juvenile Experiences , 2015, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[17]  P. David,et al.  Environment-Dependent Sexual Selection: Bateman’s Parameters under Varying Levels of Food Availability , 2015, The American Naturalist.

[18]  M. West-Eberhard.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Darwin's Forgotten Idea: the Social Essence of Sexual Selection , 2022 .

[19]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  Genetic Variation in Host Plants Influences the Mate Preferences of a Plant-Feeding Insect , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[20]  P. J. Moore.  Reproductive physiology and behaviour , 2014 .

[21]  G. Höbel.  Socially mediated plasticity of chorusing behavior in the gladiator frog Hypsiboas rosenbergi , 2014, acta ethologica.

[22]  R. C. Brooks,et al.  Long-Term Effect of Social Interactions on Behavioral Plasticity and Lifetime Mating Success , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[23]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Priority of precedence: receiver psychology, female preference for leading calls and sexual selection in insect choruses , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  T. Bilde,et al.  Sperm storage mediated by cryptic female choice for nuptial gifts , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  P. J. Moore,et al.  Oosorption and migratory strategy of the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  L. Simmons,et al.  Female preferences for acoustic and olfactory signals during courtship: Male crickets send multiple messages , 2013 .

[27]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  Genetic variation in social influence on mate preferences , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  G. Höbel,et al.  Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences , 2013, Ecology letters.

[29]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  The evolution and evolutionary consequences of social plasticity in mate preferences , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  O. Brunel.  De la communication acoustique au sein du groupe : contraintes et mécanismes , 2012 .

[31]  Barbara Taborsky,et al.  Social competence: an evolutionary approach. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  Mark Kirkpatrick,et al.  Genetics and evolution of function-valued traits: understanding environmentally responsive phenotypes. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  The evolution of experience‐mediated plasticity in mate preferences , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[34]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  T. Chapman,et al.  Individual plastic responses by males to rivals reveal mismatches between behaviour and fitness outcomes , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  F. Barbosa.  Males responding to sperm competition cues have higher fertilization success in a soldier fly , 2012 .

[37]  D. Richardson,et al.  Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  EXPERIENCE‐MEDIATED PLASTICITY IN MATE PREFERENCES: MATING ASSURANCE IN A VARIABLE ENVIRONMENT , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  T. Chapman,et al.  Quick-change artists: male plastic behavioural responses to rivals. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  P. J. Moore,et al.  Oosorption in response to poor food: complexity in the trade-off between reproduction and survival , 2011, Ecology and evolution.

[41]  R. Brooks,et al.  It's All Who You Know: The Evolution Of Socially Cued Anticipatory Plasticity As A Mating Strategy , 2011, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[42]  M. Zuk,et al.  Mating experience in field crickets modifies pre- and postcopulatory female choice in parallel , 2011 .

[43]  F. Eroukhmanoff,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to the Social Environment: Effects of Density and Sex Ratio on Mating Behaviour Following Ecotype Divergence , 2010, PloS one.

[44]  Philip J. R. Goulder,et al.  Amino-Acid Co-Variation in HIV-1 Gag Subtype C: HLA-Mediated Selection Pressure and Compensatory Dynamics , 2010, PloS one.

[45]  L. Simmons,et al.  Sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[46]  M. Zuk,et al.  Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  N. Bailey.  Love will tear you apart: different components of female choice exert contrasting selection pressures on male field crickets , 2008 .

[48]  B. Lyon,et al.  Adaptive Plasticity in Female Mate Choice Dampens Sexual Selection on Male Ornaments in the Lark Bunting , 2008, Science.

[49]  T. Valone.  From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[50]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Selective phonotaxis by male wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) to the sound of a chorus , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[51]  M. G. Ritchie,et al.  An unusual phylogeography in the bushcricket Ephippiger ephippiger from Southern France , 2006, Heredity.

[52]  H. Kokko,et al.  Unifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection , 2006 .

[53]  Jennifer Small,et al.  Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences , 2006, Current Biology.

[54]  Mark Kirkpatrick,et al.  Up hill, down dale: quantitative genetics of curvaceous traits , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  C. Boake.  Repeatability: Its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior , 1989, Evolutionary Ecology.

[56]  M. Ritchie,et al.  Sperm competition and the level of polyandry in a bushcricket with large nuptial gifts , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[57]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[58]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Variation and Repeatability of Female Choice in a Chorusing Katydid, Ephippiger ephippiger: an Experimental Exploration of the Precedence Effect , 2004 .

[59]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Katydids and Bush-Crickets: Reproductive Behavior and Evolution of the Tettigoniidae , 2003 .

[60]  Michael R. Dohm,et al.  Repeatability estimates do not always set an upper limit to heritability , 2002 .

[61]  Qvarnström.  Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[62]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  K. Pfennig,et al.  Evolution of male mating behavior: male spadefoot toads preferentially associate with conspecific males , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[64]  Widemo,et al.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[65]  K. L. Muller.  The role of conspecifics in habitat settlement in a territorial grasshopper , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[66]  M. Ritchie,et al.  The shape of female mating preferences. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[68]  N. Wedell.  Variation in nuptial gift quality in bush crickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1994 .

[69]  N. Wedell.  Dual function of the bushcricket spermatophore , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[70]  M. Ritchie.  Variation in male song and female preference within a population of Ephippiger ephippiger (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  M. Ritchie.  Behavioral coupling in tettigoniid hybrids (Orthoptera) , 1992, Behavior genetics.

[72]  S. Stearns,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1992 .

[73]  D. Roff.  The evolution of life histories : theory and analysis , 1992 .

[74]  M. Ritchie.  Female preference for ‘song races’ of Ephippiger ephippiger (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  M. Duijm.  On Some Song Characteristics in Ephippiger (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea) and Their Geographic Variation , 1989 .

[76]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake , 1987 .

[77]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Reproductive Effort and Terminal Investment in Iteroparous Animals , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[78]  M. Wade,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF INSECT MATING SYSTEMS. , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[79]  M. West-Eberhard.  Sexual Selection, Social Competition, and Speciation , 1983, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[80]  W. J. Bell,et al.  OOSORPTION IN INSECTS , 1975, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[81]  B. Dumortier,et al.  Observations sur le comportement acousticosexuel de la female d'Ephippiger bitterensis. , 1954 .