MetaMHC: a meta approach to predict peptides binding to MHC molecules

As antigenic peptides binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules is the prerequisite of cellular immune responses, an accurate computational predictor will be of great benefit to biologists and immunologists for understanding the underlying mechanism of immune recognition as well as facilitating the process of epitope mapping and vaccine design. Although various computational approaches have been developed, recent experimental results on benchmark data sets show that the development of improved predictors is needed, especially for MHC Class II peptide binding. To make the most of current methods and achieve a higher predictive performance, we developed a new web server, MetaMHC, to integrate the outputs of leading predictors by several popular ensemble strategies. MetaMHC consists of two components: MetaMHCI and MetaMHCII for MHC Class I peptide and MHC Class II peptide binding predictions, respectively. Experimental results by both cross-validation and using an independent data set show that the ensemble approaches outperform individual predictors, being statistically significant. MetaMHC is freely available at http://www.biokdd.fudan.edu.cn/Service/MetaMHC.html.

[1]  Vladimir Brusic,et al.  Evaluation of MHC-II peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  NN-align. An artificial neural network-based alignment algorithm for MHC class II peptide binding prediction , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  NetMHC-3.0: accurate web accessible predictions of human, mouse and monkey MHC class I affinities for peptides of length 8–11 , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  Qing Zhang,et al.  Immune epitope database analysis resource (IEDB-AR) , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Ole Lund,et al.  Immunological Bioinformatics (Computational Molecular Biology) , 2005 .

[6]  V. Brusic,et al.  Evaluation of MHC class I peptide binding prediction servers: Applications for vaccine research , 2008, BMC Immunology.

[7]  Ronald E. Bontrop,et al.  Immunogenetics , 2005, Genes and Immunity.

[8]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  Quantitative Predictions of Peptide Binding to Any HLA-DR Molecule of Known Sequence: NetMHCIIpan , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  Stacked generalization , 1992, Neural Networks.

[10]  Darren R. Flower,et al.  Predicting Class II MHC-Peptide binding: a kernel based approach using similarity scores , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  John Sidney,et al.  A Systematic Assessment of MHC Class II Peptide Binding Predictions and Evaluation of a Consensus Approach , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  R. Polikar,et al.  Ensemble based systems in decision making , 2006, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine.

[14]  C. Janeway.  Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease , 1996 .

[15]  Arun Ross,et al.  Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  H Mamitsuka,et al.  Predicting peptides that bind to MHC molecules using supervised learning of hidden markov models , 1998, Proteins.

[17]  Bjoern Peters,et al.  Automated generation and evaluation of specific MHC binding predictive tools: ARB matrix applications , 2005, Immunogenetics.

[18]  Alessandro Sette,et al.  Generating quantitative models describing the sequence specificity of biological processes with the stabilized matrix method , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[19]  Mathieu Blanchette,et al.  FootPrinter3: phylogenetic footprinting in partially alignable sequences , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  O. Lund,et al.  NetMHCpan, a Method for Quantitative Predictions of Peptide Binding to Any HLA-A and -B Locus Protein of Known Sequence , 2007, PloS one.

[21]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  H. Rammensee,et al.  SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs , 1999, Immunogenetics.

[23]  James McCluskey,et al.  More than one reason to rethink the use of peptides in vaccine design , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[24]  Naoki Abe,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of a Dynamic Experiment Design Method for Prediction of MHC Class I-Binding Peptides1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[25]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  Immunological bioinformatics , 2005, Computational molecular biology.

[26]  O. Lund,et al.  novel sequence representations Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with , 2003 .

[27]  John Sidney,et al.  Improving MHC binding peptide prediction by incorporating binding data of auxiliary MHC molecules , 2006, Bioinform..

[28]  Vladimir Brusic,et al.  MULTIPRED: a computational system for prediction of promiscuous HLA binding peptides , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[29]  Lei Huang,et al.  A probabilistic meta-predictor for the MHC class II binding peptides , 2007, Immunogenetics.

[30]  Oliver Kohlbacher,et al.  SVMHC: a server for prediction of MHC-binding peptides , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  K. Parker,et al.  Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[32]  U. Şahin,et al.  Generation of tissue-specific and promiscuous HLA ligand databases using DNA microarrays and virtual HLA class II matrices , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.