Variation in journal peer review systems. Possible causes and consequences.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Eugene Garfield,et al. Anthropology Journals: What They Cite and What Cites Them , 1984, Current Anthropology.
[2] W. D. Garvey. Communication, the essence of science , 1979 .
[3] Lowell L. Hargens,et al. Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates. , 1988 .
[4] M. Gordon. A study of the evaluation of research papers by primary journals in the UK , 1978 .
[5] W. D. Garvey,et al. Communication in the Physical and the Social Sciences , 1970, Science.
[6] R. Merton,et al. Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system , 1971 .
[7] APS reviews refereeing procedures , 1982 .
[8] A. Tversky,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.
[9] W. Hagstrom. Competition in Science , 1974 .
[10] Helmut A. Abt,et al. WHAT HAPPENS TO REJECTED ASTRONOMICAL PAPERS? , 1988 .
[11] W. Hagstrom. The scientific community , 1966 .
[12] S. Lock,et al. A difficult balance: editorial peer review in medicine continued. , 1985 .