A new consumption-based accounting model for greenhouse gases from 1948 to 2012

Abstract Greenhouse gas emissions embodied in international trade have grown rapidly as globalization has progressed and potentially threaten the efficacy of unilateral climate treaties such as the Kyoto Protocol. Consumption-based methods have been put forward as a way of overcoming this issue and help design future climate policies. We improve the Long-term Consumption-based Accounting (LCBA) model, with transfer carbon data from 1948 to 2012 by introducing country-specific import intensities and detailed bilateral trade data from UNcomtrade. Comparisons of our new “LCBA2″ model with existing 4 studies show similar consumption based emission patterns both in trend and magnitude, and significant emission changes in many European countries. The results independently confirm previous findings on the efficacy of the Kyoto Protocol. The results indicate transferred emissions have contributed an historic 36 Gt CO 2 of cumulative emissions, have grown rapidly during the past 30 years (up to 8% of total emissions) and are likely to become increasingly influential in the near future as the global economy recovers. We also use the improved model to study other gases (CH 4 , N 2 O and SO 2 ) embodied in trade, and results indicate similar transfer patterns as CO 2 with comparable or even moderately larger magnitudes. Across-method result differences between LCBA2 with 3 other models are analyzed based on using common input datasets. Large emitters show moderate biases (within 10%) and about 75% of countries have differences within 25%, independent of input dataset. The LCBA2 model provides useful estimates of transferred emissions in both across-country and long-term historical contexts.

[1]  J. Moore,et al.  Constructing long-term (1948–2011) consumption-based emissions inventories , 2015 .

[2]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  CONSTRUCTING AN ENVIRONMENTALLY-EXTENDED MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT TABLE USING THE GTAP DATABASE , 2011 .

[3]  Anne Owen,et al.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MRIO DATABASES , 2014 .

[4]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  COMPARING THE GTAP-MRIO AND WIOD DATABASES FOR CARBON FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS , 2014 .

[5]  Gabriel Felbermayr,et al.  Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations , 2012 .

[6]  Michael Hübler,et al.  Between a Rock and a Hard Place: A Trade-Theory Analysis of Leakage Under Production- and Consumption-Based Policies , 2013 .

[7]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis , 2011 .

[8]  Zbigniew Klimont,et al.  Anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions: 1850–2005 , 2010 .

[9]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Trade, transport, and sinks extend the carbon dioxide responsibility of countries: An editorial essay , 2009 .

[10]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  Comparing the use of GTAP-MRIO and WIOD for carbon footprint analysis , 2014 .

[11]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  A "carbonizing dragon": China's fast growing CO2 emissions revisited. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: New evidence from air pollution , 2014 .

[13]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  BUILDING EORA: A GLOBAL MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT DATABASE AT HIGH COUNTRY AND SECTOR RESOLUTION , 2013 .

[14]  G. Peters From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories , 2008 .

[15]  G. Peters,et al.  A synthesis of carbon in international trade , 2012 .

[16]  Bo Meng,et al.  COMPILATION AND APPLICATIONS OF IDE-JETRO'S INTERNATIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT TABLES , 2013 .

[17]  Lee Liu A critical examination of the consumption‐based accounting approach: has the blaming of consumers gone too far? , 2015 .

[18]  S. Davis,et al.  Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Daniel Moran,et al.  CONVERGENCE BETWEEN THE EORA, WIOD, EXIOBASE, AND OPENEU'S CONSUMPTION-BASED CARBON ACCOUNTS , 2014 .

[20]  Karl W. Steininger,et al.  Justice and cost effectiveness of consumption-based versus production-based approaches in the case of unilateral climate policies , 2014 .

[21]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  A MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT TABLE BASED ON THE GLOBAL TRADE ANALYSIS PROJECT DATABASE (GTAP-MRIO) , 2013 .

[22]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  Consumption- Versus Production-Based Emission Policies , 2014 .

[23]  Giovanni Baiocchi,et al.  Understanding changes in the UK's CO2 emissions: a global perspective. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Norihisa Sakurai,et al.  The Measurement of CO2 Embodiments in International Trade: Evidence from the Harmonised Input-Output and Bilateral Trade Database , 2009 .

[25]  Michael Jakob,et al.  Interpreting trade-related CO 2 emission transfers , 2013 .

[26]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Production Factors and Pollution Embodied in Trade: Theoretical Development , 2004 .

[27]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  GLOBAL MULTIREGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT FRAMEWORKS: AN INTRODUCTION AND OUTLOOK , 2013 .

[28]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Mapping the structure of the world economy. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Jieming Chou,et al.  Developed and developing world contributions to climate system change based on carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions , 2016, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences.

[30]  Peter D. Blair,et al.  Input-Output Analysis , 2021 .

[31]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  INVESTIGATING ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO HARMONISE MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT DATA , 2014 .

[32]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change , 2008 .

[33]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[34]  Kirsten S. Wiebe,et al.  CALCULATING ENERGY-RELATED CO2 EMISSIONS EMBODIED IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE USING A GLOBAL INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL , 2012 .

[35]  Xue-Jie Gao,et al.  Developed and developing world responsibilities for historical climate change and CO2 mitigation , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  C. Weber,et al.  Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Matthias Schroder,et al.  Input–Output Analysis , 2011 .

[38]  Rueda Cantuche Jose,et al.  Global Resources Use and Pollution:Vol. I, Production, Consumption and Trade (1995-2008) , 2012 .

[39]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Steven J Davis,et al.  The supply chain of CO2 emissions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Bart Los,et al.  THE CONSTRUCTION OF WORLD INPUT–OUTPUT TABLES IN THE WIOD PROJECT , 2013 .

[42]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  Climate change policy and international trade: Policy considerations in the US , 2009 .

[43]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  Climate policy and dependence on traded carbon , 2013 .

[44]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A CARBON FOOTPRINT TIME SERIES OF THE UK – RESULTS FROM A MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL , 2010 .

[45]  H Scott Matthews,et al.  Embodied environmental emissions in U.S. international trade, 1997-2004. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  R. Marschinski,et al.  Should carbon-exporting countries strive for consumption-based accounting in a global cap-and-trade regime? , 2010 .

[47]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  CO2 Multipliers in Multi-region Input-Output Models , 2004 .

[48]  Joseph F. Francois,et al.  The World Input-Output Database (WIOD): Contents, Sources and Methods , 2012 .

[49]  P. Quirion,et al.  Climate policy and the ‘carbon haven’ effect , 2014 .

[50]  S. Davis,et al.  Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions: A matter of time , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  R. B.,et al.  The United Nations , 1947, Nature.

[52]  C. Weber,et al.  Journey to world top emitter: An analysis of the driving forces of China's recent CO2 emissions surge , 2009 .

[53]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study , 2013 .

[54]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION APPROACH TO COMPARING MRIO DATABASES , 2014 .