Assessing wood use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of wood product cascading in the European Union

Abstract Cascading use of biomass is a recognized strategy contributing to an efficient development of the bioeconomy and for mitigating climate change. This study aims at assessing the potential of cascading use of woody biomass for reducing GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions and increasing the overall wood flow efficiency in the European Union's forest and bioeconomy sectors. A scenario and life cycle approach was followed to quantify the potential benefits of cascading use of woody biomass. We started from a reference scenario in which (post-consumer) waste wood and paper are re-utilized for energy only (S0). Then we compared the reference scenario with two alternative scenarios, the current waste wood and paper recycling practices (S1) and the maximum technical potential to increase recycling of waste wood and paper flows (S2). Following a supply chain perspective, different stages of production were analysed, including forgone fossil-fuels substitution, optimization at manufacturing level and forest regrowth. Through cascading use, the wood use efficiency ratio (cascade factor) in the European wood sector would be increased by 23% (S0 vs S1) and 31% (S0 vs S2) and GHG emissions (cradle-to-gate energy use) would be reduced by 42% (28 MtCO2-eq/year) and 52% (35 MtCO2-eq/year) in scenarios S1 and S2. However, increased wood product cascading is counter effected in the short term by reduced savings in the energy sector by 49% and 48% (−43 and −42 MtCO2-eq/year) in scenarios S1 and S2 due to delayed availability of waste wood and waste paper fibers. This explorative study highlights the potential of cascading use of woody biomass in the wood production chains to contribute to a reduction of environmental impacts related to wood resource and energy use, but it also reveals trade-offs in terms of GHG emissions reduction, relevant especially in meeting short-term (2020–2030) renewable energy targets.

[1]  Gert-Jan Nabuurs,et al.  European forests show no carbon debt, only a long parity effect☆ , 2017 .

[2]  Sara González-García,et al.  Environmental impacts of forest production and supply of pulpwood: Spanish and Swedish case studies , 2009 .

[3]  Alexandra Purkus,et al.  Possible Futures towards a Wood-Based Bioeconomy: A Scenario Analysis for Germany , 2016 .

[4]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Potentials for cascading of recovered wood from building deconstruction—A case study for south-east Germany , 2013 .

[5]  André Faaij,et al.  Cost and Co2-Emission Reduction of Biomass Cascading: Methodological Aspects and Case Study of SRF Poplar , 2005 .

[6]  N. Scarlat,et al.  Renewable energy policy framework and bioenergy contribution in the European Union – An overview from National Renewable Energy Action Plans and Progress Reports , 2015 .

[7]  Christian Lauk,et al.  Global patterns and trends of wood harvest and use between 1990 and 2010 , 2015 .

[8]  Laura Sokka,et al.  Classification of used wood to biomass fuel or solid recycled fuel and cascading use in Finland , 2015 .

[9]  Maureen E. Puettmann,et al.  Cradle to Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Softwood Lumber Production from the Northeast-North Central , 2013 .

[10]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Energy and carbon balances of wood cascade chains , 2006 .

[11]  H. Weisz,et al.  Methodology and Indicators of Economy‐wide Material Flow Accounting , 2011 .

[12]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Large‐scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral , 2012 .

[13]  Marta Herva,et al.  Assessing environmental sustainability of particleboard production process by ecological footprint , 2013 .

[14]  Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz,et al.  How can the ambitious goals for the EU’s future bioeconomy be supported by sustainable and efficient wood sourcing practices? , 2017 .

[15]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Recycling of wood for particle board production: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[16]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Collection, transfer and transport of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[17]  Alexander Müller,et al.  The Role of Biomass in the Sustainable Development Goals: A Reality Check and Governance Implications , 2015 .

[18]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  Comparative environmental assessment of wood transport models: a case study of a Swedish pulp mill. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  M. Harmon,et al.  Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production , 2012 .

[20]  Erkki Tomppo,et al.  A report to the food and agriculture organization of the united nations (FAO) in support of sampling study for National Forestry Resources Monitoring and Assessment (NAFORMA) in Tanzania , 2010 .

[21]  Martin Junginger,et al.  The GHG contribution of the cascaded use of harvested wood products in comparison with the use of wood for energy-A case study on available forest resources in Canada , 2013 .

[22]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Diesel consumption in waste collection and transport and its environmental significance , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[23]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Environmental impacts of eucalypt and maritime pine wood production in Portugal , 2012 .

[24]  B. Solberg,et al.  Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden , 2005 .

[25]  P. Bajpai Management of Pulp and Paper Mill Waste , 2014 .

[26]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Cascade utilization of biomass: strategies for a more efficient use of a scarce resource , 2000 .

[27]  André Faaij,et al.  Optimising waste treatment systems - Part A: Methodology and technological data for optimising energy production and economic performance , 2006 .

[28]  S. Colombo,et al.  Effects of harvesting on spatial and temporal diversity of carbon stocks in a boreal forest landscape , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[29]  Jari Liski,et al.  Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in European forests , 2004 .

[30]  S. Manfredi,et al.  Landfilling of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[31]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Evaluation of Wood Cascading , 2015 .

[32]  國合會系統管理者 Global Forest Resources Assessment , 2016 .

[33]  D. Deselnicu,et al.  Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe , 2014 .

[34]  Martyn N. Futter,et al.  Consequences of More Intensive Forestry for the Sustainable Management of Forest Soils and Waters , 2011 .

[35]  Kim Pingoud,et al.  Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration , 2001 .

[36]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Paper and biomass for energy?: The impact of paper recycling on energy and CO2 emissions , 2010 .

[37]  Rubén Miranda Carreño,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING A HIGHER USE OF RECOVERED PAPER IN THE EUROPEAN PAPER INDUSTRY , 2010 .

[38]  Marcus Knauf,et al.  An Analysis of Wood Market Balance Modeling in Germany , 2015 .

[39]  U. Mantau,et al.  Wood flow analysis: Quantification of resource potentials, cascades and carbon effects , 2015 .

[40]  Oliver Bens,et al.  Carbon sequestration and forest management , 2007 .

[41]  Svetlana Proskurina,et al.  Five years left – How are the EU member states contributing to the 20% target for EU's renewable energy consumption; the role of woody biomass , 2016 .

[42]  B. Elbersen,et al.  Cascading use: a systematic approach to biomass beyond the energy sector , 2013 .

[43]  Thomas J. Farmer,et al.  Definition, Calculation and Comparison of the "Biomass Utilization Efficiency (BUE)" of Various Bio-based Chemicals, Polymers and Fuels , 2015 .

[44]  H. M. Junginger,et al.  Production and trading of biomass for energy – an overview of the global status , 2007 .