Framework for the use of official occupational accident investigations as a learning tool: analysis of a public programme for accident investigation in the manufacturing sector

Accident investigation is a useful tool for safety science. The use of accident investigation as a learning tool at the macro level necessitates specific requirements quite different from the usual needs at the company level. A proper codification system and information on the accident scenarios are needed to let safety practitioners identify if the information is useful for the organisations they are assessing. In the same way epidemiological tools have been applied to the analysis of circumstances of accidents, the epidemiological statistical tools can help to draw conclusions for a set of investigated accidents. Our case study includes the description of the dataset used in a programme for learning from accidents in Andalusia: ‘Pudo haberse evitado’ (this can be translated as ‘This could have been prevented’). This paper covers the requisites for a macro-level learning programme and the possibilities of analysis of the dataset in a ‘research to practice approach’.

[1]  Ann Williamson,et al.  Associations between Errors and Contributing Factors in Aircraft Maintenance , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Elaine Aspinwall,et al.  A survey on occupational accidents' reporting and registration systems in the European Union , 2004 .

[3]  Ann Williamson,et al.  Industry differences in accident causation , 1996 .

[4]  R Rautiainen,et al.  The Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation program's role in the prevention of occupational fatalities , 2001, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[5]  Methodology of organizational learning in risk management : Development of a collective memory for sanitary alerts , 2002 .

[6]  T K Courtney,et al.  Using narrative text and coded data to develop hazard scenarios for occupational injury interventions , 2004, Injury Prevention.

[7]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  The Changing Nature Of Risks , 2010 .

[8]  Emmanuel Manatakis,et al.  Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models , 2009 .

[9]  Petra Willquist,et al.  Identifying and analysing hazards in manufacturing industry—a review of selected methods and development of a framework for method applicability , 2003 .

[10]  Ioannis A. Papazoglou,et al.  Modeling accidents for prioritizing prevention , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Luis Onieva,et al.  Causation of Severe and Fatal Accidents in the Manufacturing Sector , 2013, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[12]  Pete Kines,et al.  Construction workers' falls through roofs: fatal versus serious injuries. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[13]  O. N. Aneziris,et al.  Assessment of occupational risks in an aluminium processing industry , 2010 .

[14]  Elaine Aspinwall,et al.  WORK ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATION TECHNIQUE (WAIT) - PART I , 2003 .

[15]  P. Ray,et al.  Occupational injury and accident research: A comprehensive review , 2012 .

[16]  G. Athanassiou,et al.  Evaluation of operators' performance for automation design in the fully digital control room of nuclear power plants , 2010 .

[17]  Snorre Sklet,et al.  Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[18]  Chia-Fen Chi,et al.  In-depth accident analysis of electrical fatalities in the construction industry , 2009 .

[19]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  APPLYING REASON: THE HUMAN FACTORS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (HFACS) , 2001 .