A Comparison of Optimization Approaches for Nationwide Trac Flow Management

Given thousands of flights in a capacity-limited airspace, finding optimal scheduling strategies that minimize delay costs is a computationally difficult task. In this paper, stochastic search techniques are applied to this fundamental Traffic Flow Management problem. Genetic algorithms and simulated annealing rely on searching the solution space in a manner much different than traditional optimization methods. These stochastic search techniques are compared to an integer linear programming model previously described in the literature. The runtime and aircraft schedules resulting from each model are analyzed. Results indicate that the integer programming model finds the optimal schedule faster than the next best technique, simulated annealing. In the presented experiments, solving the same problem with different simulated annealing solvers in parallel, a quality solution (within 5% of optimality) can be found in most cases. With roughly the same number of computations, simulated annealing reached a better solution than the genetic algorithm in 6 out of the 9 scenarios tested.

[1]  Erick Cantú-Paz,et al.  A Survey of Parallel Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[2]  L. Ingber Very fast simulated re-annealing , 1989 .

[3]  Joseph L. Rios,et al.  Massively Parallel Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition Applied to Traffic Flow Scheduling , 2010, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[4]  Michael O. Ball,et al.  Ground Delay Programs: Optimizing over the Included Flight Set Based on Distance , 2004 .

[5]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[6]  Cheol Hoon Park,et al.  Fast Simulated Annealing with Greedy Selection , 2007 .

[7]  Monish D. Tandale,et al.  Genetic Algorithm Based Ground Delay Program Computations for Sector Density Control , 2007 .

[8]  Craig Wanke,et al.  A Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for Solving Airspace Congestion Problems , 2007 .

[9]  Karl D. Bilimoria,et al.  New Approach for Modeling, Analysis, and Control of Air Traffic Flow , 2002 .

[10]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[11]  Michael O. Ball,et al.  A GENERAL APPROACH TO EQUITY IN TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT AND ITS APPLICATION TO MITIGATING EXEMPTION BIAS IN GROUND DELAY PROGRAMS , 2003 .

[12]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Adjoint-based control of a new eulerian network model of air traffic flow , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[13]  Kevin Ross,et al.  Delay Optimization for Airspace Capacity Management with Runtime and Equity Considerations , 2007 .

[14]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Lagrangian Delay Predictive Model for Sector-Based Air Traffic Flow , 2005 .

[15]  H. Szu Fast simulated annealing , 1987 .

[16]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  The Air Traffic Flow Management Problem with Enroute Capacities , 1998, Oper. Res..

[17]  Gilbert Syswerda,et al.  The Application of Genetic Algorithms to Resource Scheduling , 1991, International Conference on Genetic Algorithms.

[18]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[19]  Guglielmo Lulli,et al.  THE EUROPEAN AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT PROBLEM , 2006 .

[20]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[21]  Daniel Delahaye,et al.  Reduction of Air Traffic Congestion by Genetic Algorithms , 1998, PPSN.

[22]  Kevin Ross,et al.  Massively Parallel Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition Applied to Traffic Flow Scheduling , 2009 .

[23]  Kapil Sheth,et al.  FACET: Future ATM Concepts Evaluation Tool , 2001 .