BIODYNAMICS OF STEERING WHEEL INDUCED FACIAL TRAUMA

The present study was undertaken to determine the impact biomechanics of the facial skeleton secondary to steering wheel loading. Because of the particular relevance of the zygomatic bony complex in facial trauma during motor-vehicle accidents, tests were conducted by impacting the zygoma using a vertical drop impact test system. Zygoma was impacted once onto either soft or rigid wheel surfaces at velocities of up to 6.7 m/s. Peak impact forces at the cadaver zygoma were computed from the generalized force and deformation histories using matrix transformation principles. Structural abnormalities were assessed using pre- and post-test plain radiography, two-and three-dimensional computed tomography, and defleshing techniques. At impact velocities of 1.7 to 6.7 m/s, the human cadaver zygoma did not exhibit clinically significant fractures if the peak force was below 1335 N for the soft wheel interface and 1153 N for the rigid wheel interface. Consequently, to mitigate facial injuries due to unsupported rim impact, the data from the present study suggests that the peak dynamic force should be kept within these limits.

[1]  M. Ramet,et al.  A comparison of human facial fracture tolerance with the performance of a surrogate test device , 1989 .

[2]  D C Viano,et al.  Cause and control of automotive trauma. , 1988, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[3]  W. F. Wagner,et al.  The epidemiology of facial fractures. , 1978, The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association.

[4]  J. P. Danforth,et al.  Impact Tolerance of the Skull and Face , 1968 .

[5]  Anthony Sances,et al.  Three-dimensional computerized tomography analysis of steering wheel induced facial trauma , 1989 .

[6]  D. C. Schneider,et al.  Impact Studies of Facial Bones and Skull , 1972 .

[7]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Steering Wheel Induced Facial Trauma , 1988 .

[8]  C. Hirsch,et al.  Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone. , 1966, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  John M. Cavanaugh,et al.  Facial impact tolerance and response , 1986 .

[10]  J. Olofsson,et al.  Facial fractures: a review of 922 cases with special reference to incidence and aetiology. , 1982, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[11]  Roger A. Saul,et al.  Restrained drivers' facial skeleton injuries resulting from steering assembly contact: a conspectus , 1989 .

[12]  Slade Penoyre,et al.  Safer steering wheels to reduce face bone fractures , 1989 .

[13]  Jeffrey H. Marcus,et al.  Priorities of automobile crash safety based on impairment , 1987 .

[14]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Dynamic Response of the Human Cadaver Head Compared to a Simple Mathematical Model , 1968 .

[15]  D F Huelke,et al.  Facial injuries in automobile crashes. , 1983, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[16]  J Melvin,et al.  Facial injury assessment techniques , 1989 .

[17]  V R Hodgson,et al.  Mechanical impedance and impact response of the human cadaver zygoma. , 1968, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  V. R. Hodgson,et al.  Tolerance of the facial bones to impact , 1967 .

[19]  J. J. Swearingen,et al.  Tolerances of the human face to crash impact. , 1965 .