Unraveling enzyme discrimination during cellulosome assembly independent of cohesin–dockerin affinity

Bacterial cellulosomes are generally believed to assemble at random, like those produced by Clostridium cellulolyticum. They are composed of one scaffolding protein bearing eight homologous type I cohesins that bind to any of the type I dockerins borne by the 62 cellulosomal subunits, thus generating highly heterogeneous complexes. In the present study, the heterogeneity and random assembly of the cellulosomes were evaluated with a simpler model: a miniscaffoldin containing three C. cellulolyticum cohesins and three cellulases of the same bacterium bearing the cognate dockerin (Cel5A, Cel48F, and Cel9G). Surprisingly, rather than the expected randomized integration of enzymes, the assembly of the minicellulosome generated only three distinct types of complex out of the 10 possible combinations, thus indicating preferential integration of enzymes upon binding to the scaffoldin. A hybrid scaffoldin that displays one cohesin from C. cellulolyticum and one from C. thermocellum, thus allowing sequential integration of enzymes, was exploited to further characterize this phenomenon. The initial binding of a given enzyme to the C. thermocellum cohesin was found to influence the type of enzyme that subsequently bound to the C. cellulolyticum cohesin. The preferential integration appears to be related to the length of the inter‐cohesin linker. The data indicate that the binding of a cellulosomal enzyme to a cohesin has a direct influence on the dockerin‐bearing proteins that will subsequently interact with adjacent cohesins. Thus, despite the general lack of specificity of the cohesin–dockerin interaction within a given species and type, bacterial cellulosomes are not necessarily assembled at random.

[1]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  From cellulosomes to cellulosomics. , 2008, Chemical record.

[2]  K. Sakka,et al.  Analysis of a Clostridium josui Cellulase Gene Cluster Containing the man5A Gene and Characterization of Recombinant Man5A , 2010, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[3]  E. Bayer,et al.  Enhanced cellulose degradation by nano-complexed enzymes: Synergism between a scaffold-linked exoglucanase and a free endoglucanase. , 2010, Journal of biotechnology.

[4]  C. Tardif,et al.  Characterization of the cellulolytic complex (cellulosome) produced by Clostridium cellulolyticum , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  O. Shoseyov,et al.  Essential 170-kDa subunit for degradation of crystalline cellulose by Clostridium cellulovorans cellulase. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Hammel,et al.  Structural Insights into the Mechanism of Formation of Cellulosomes Probed by Small Angle X-ray Scattering* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  S. Champ,et al.  Cellulosome from Clostridium cellulolyticum: molecular study of the Dockerin/Cohesin interaction. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[8]  C. Tardif,et al.  CelG from Clostridium cellulolyticum: a multidomain endoglucanase acting efficiently on crystalline cellulose , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  S. Leschine,et al.  Multicomplex cellulase-xylanase system of Clostridium papyrosolvens C7 , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  J. Wu,et al.  Exoglucanase activities of the recombinant Clostridium thermocellum CelS, a major cellulosome component , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  H. Fierobe,et al.  Characterization of endoglucanase A from Clostridium cellulolyticum , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  P. Dasgupta Chromatographic peak resolution using Microsoft Excel Solver. The merit of time shifting input arrays. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[13]  Jonathan Caspi,et al.  Cellulase-Xylanase Synergy in Designer Cellulosomes for Enhanced Degradation of a Complex Cellulosic Substrate , 2010, mBio.

[14]  E. Bayer,et al.  Expression, purification and subunit‐binding properties of cohesins 2 and 3 of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome , 1995, FEBS letters.

[15]  K. Kuroda,et al.  Comparison of the mesophilic cellulosome‐producing Clostridium cellulovorans genome with other cellulosome‐related clostridial genomes , 2010, Microbial biotechnology.

[16]  B. Henrissat,et al.  Modulation of cellulosome composition in Clostridium cellulolyticum: Adaptation to the polysaccharide environment revealed by proteomic and carbohydrate‐active enzyme analyses , 2010, Proteomics.

[17]  C. Tardif,et al.  The processive endocellulase CelF, a major component of the Clostridium cellulolyticum cellulosome: purification and characterization of the recombinant form , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[18]  H. Fierobe,et al.  Sequence Analysis of Scaffolding Protein CipC and ORFXp, a New Cohesin-Containing Protein inClostridium cellulolyticum: Comparison of Various Cohesin Domains and Subcellular Localization of ORFXp , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  H. Fierobe,et al.  Towards Designer Cellulosomes in Clostridia: Mannanase Enrichment of the Cellulosomes Produced by Clostridium cellulolyticum , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  C. Tardif,et al.  Interaction between the endoglucanase CelA and the scaffolding protein CipC of the Clostridium cellulolyticum cellulosome , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  H. Fierobe,et al.  Synergy, structure and conformational flexibility of hybrid cellulosomes displaying various inter-cohesins linkers. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  D. Becher,et al.  A Two-Component System (XydS/R) Controls the Expression of Genes Encoding CBM6-Containing Proteins in Response to Straw in Clostridium cellulolyticum , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  K. Sakka,et al.  Functional insights into the role of novel type I cohesin and dockerin domains from Clostridium thermocellum. , 2009, The Biochemical journal.

[24]  Tsutomu Kajino,et al.  Cohesin-Dockerin Interactions within and between Clostridium josui and Clostridium thermocellum , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  H. Fierobe,et al.  Combining free and aggregated cellulolytic systems in the cellulosome-producing bacterium Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum , 2015, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[26]  H. Maamar,et al.  Cellulolysis is severely affected in Clostridium cellulolyticum strain cipCMut1 , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  E. Bayer,et al.  The cellulosomes: multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. , 2004, Annual review of microbiology.

[28]  H. Fierobe,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation of the Clostridium cellulolyticum cip-cel Operon: a Complex Mechanism Involving a Catabolite-Responsive Element , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[29]  E. Bayer,et al.  Deconstruction of Lignocellulose into Soluble Sugars by Native and Designer Cellulosomes , 2012, mBio.

[30]  Edward A Bayer,et al.  The Clostridium cellulolyticum Dockerin Displays a Dual Binding Mode for Its Cohesin Partner* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  Gregg T Beckham,et al.  Modeling the Self-assembly of the Cellulosome Enzyme Complex* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  K. Kuroda,et al.  Genome Sequence of the Cellulosome-Producing Mesophilic Organism Clostridium cellulovorans 743B , 2009, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Structural Basis of Cellulosome Efficiency Explored by Small Angle X-ray Scattering* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  E. Bayer,et al.  Action of Designer Cellulosomes on Homogeneous Versus Complex Substrates , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  Christopher L. Hemme,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of acetivibrio cellulolyticus provides a blueprint of an elaborate cellulosome system , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[36]  E. Bayer,et al.  Degradation of Cellulose Substrates by Cellulosome Chimeras , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  R. Doi,et al.  The Clostridium cellulovorans cellulosome: an enzyme complex with plant cell wall degrading activity. , 2001, Chemical record.

[38]  H. Fierobe,et al.  The cellulosomes from Clostridium cellulolyticum , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[39]  Harry J. Gilbert,et al.  Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin–dockerin complex , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  A. Travis,et al.  Abundance and Diversity of Dockerin-Containing Proteins in the Fiber-Degrading Rumen Bacterium, Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 , 2010, PloS one.

[41]  Harry J. Gilbert,et al.  Cellulosomes: highly efficient nanomachines designed to deconstruct plant cell wall complex carbohydrates. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.