Youth and the Internet: Uses and practices in the home

The aim of the present research was to examine the relationship between Greek young people aged 12-18 and the Internet through their patterns of Internet use in the home. A particular objective of the study was the investigation of the possible effects of social stratification, gender and age on their domestic Internet use. A sample of 418 high school students selected from 17 schools in four Greek cities completed a structured self-reported questionnaire primarily concerned with Internet use (frequency, purpose and behaviour patterns) at home and the types of the parental supervision. The research was carried out during the period 2004-2005. The main findings of the study were the following: (a) Internet access remains at a very low level and is insufficiently used for school purposes, (b) younger students (aged 12-15 years) use it more frequently than older ones for information seeking concerning school work, (c) the Internet is an indicator of social and economic stratification since most young people with access to it come from family environments with a higher educational and socioeconomic background and live in urban and semi urban areas, (d) boys make up the majority of systematic users, mainly for entertainment purposes, (e) the Internet is a place and space safeguarding the ''privacy'' of young people with the majority of them preferring to surf alone, (f) parental supervision and monitoring seems to be absent largely from the relationship between youth and the Internet, and (g) in general, the frequency and type of Internet use are not significantly affected by students' places of residence or the educational level and profession of their parents.

[1]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver-child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. , 2004, Journal of adolescence.

[2]  Cyrus R. Mehta,et al.  SPSS Exact Tests 7.0 for Windows , 2004 .

[3]  H. Skinner,et al.  Youth social action: building a global latticework through information and communication technologies. , 2002, Health promotion international.

[4]  P. Sopp Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[5]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Young People and New Media: Childhood and the Changing Media Environment , 2000 .

[6]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[7]  J. Wolak,et al.  Risk factors for and impact of online sexual solicitation of youth. , 2001, JAMA.

[8]  Hongyan Ma,et al.  Wireless Internet and student-centered learning: A Partial Least-Squares model , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[9]  J. Wolak,et al.  Escaping or connecting? Characteristics of youth who form close online relationships. , 2003, Journal of adolescence.

[10]  J. Wolak,et al.  Protecting youth online: family use of filtering and blocking software. , 2005, Child abuse & neglect.

[11]  Eliza T. Dresang More research needed: informal information-seeking behavior of youth on the Internet , 1999 .

[12]  M. Maczewski Exploring Identities Through the Internet: Youth Experiences Online , 2002 .

[13]  S. Livingstone,et al.  Children and Their Changing Media Environment : A European Comparative Study , 2001 .

[14]  P. Norris Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2001 .

[15]  David A. Huffaker Spinning yarns around the digital fire: Storytelling and dialogue among youth on the Internet , 2004, First Monday.

[16]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[17]  R. Clarke,et al.  Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis , 1985 .

[18]  Claes H. de Vreese Digital Renaissance: Young Consumer and Citizen? , 2007 .

[19]  Karen L. Murphy,et al.  Constructivism and collaboration on the Internet: case study of a graduate class experience , 1995 .

[20]  M. Aldenderfer Cluster Analysis , 1984 .

[21]  Albert L. Ingram,et al.  Beyond chat on the internet , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[22]  S. Livingstone,et al.  UK children go online: surveying the experiences of young people and their parents , 2004 .

[23]  A. Morineau,et al.  Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis , 1984 .

[24]  Michael J. Berson,et al.  Challenging Online Behaviors of Youth , 2005 .

[25]  C. D. Vreese Science Political and Social American Academy of The ANNALS of the , 2007 .

[26]  S. Livingstone,et al.  UK Children Go Online : final report of key project findings , 2005 .

[27]  Hans Kuhlemeier,et al.  The impact of computer use at home on students' Internet skills , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Developing an Internet Attitude Scale for high school students , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[29]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS professional statistics 6.1 , 1994 .

[30]  M. Greenacre Correspondence analysis in practice , 1993 .

[31]  Charlie V. Morgan,et al.  Internet use and the self concept: Linking specific uses to global self-esteem , 2002 .

[32]  A. Johansson,et al.  Internet addiction: characteristics of a questionnaire and prevalence in Norwegian youth (12-18 years). , 2004, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[33]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Technophobia, gender influences and consumer decision‐making for technology‐related products , 2003 .

[34]  Richard T. A. Wood,et al.  Risk Factors in Adolescence: The Case of Gambling, Videogame Playing, and the Internet , 2004, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[35]  G. M. Southward,et al.  Analysis of Categorical Data: Dual Scaling and Its Applications , 1981 .

[36]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report , 2004 .

[37]  Marina Papastergiou,et al.  Students’ Mental Models of the Internet and Their Didactical Exploitation in Informatics Education , 2005, Education and Information Technologies.

[38]  Chien Chou,et al.  Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: the Taiwan college students' case , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[39]  D. Tapscott Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation , 1984 .

[40]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[41]  D. Kellner,et al.  Contemporary Youth and the Postmodern Adventure , 2003 .

[42]  P. Duncombe,et al.  Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis: Correspondence Analysis and Related Techniques for Large Matrices , 1985 .

[43]  A. Agresti,et al.  Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. , 1985 .

[44]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation , 1993 .

[45]  Shazia Mumtaz,et al.  Children's enjoyment and perception of computer use in the home and the school , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[46]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[47]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1992 .

[48]  Subhash Sharma Applied multivariate techniques , 1995 .

[49]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  Social Relationships and Internet Use among Adolescents in Israel , 2001 .

[50]  A. D. Gordon,et al.  Correspondence Analysis Handbook. , 1993 .

[51]  Frontrunners or Copycats , 2005 .

[52]  P. Greenfield Developmental considerations for determining appropriate Internet use guidelines for children and adolescents , 2004 .

[53]  T. Field,et al.  The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents. , 2000, Adolescence.

[54]  J. Wolak,et al.  The Exposure Of Youth To Unwanted Sexual Material On The Internet , 2003 .

[55]  B. Wilson,et al.  Rave and Straightedge, the Virtual and the Real , 2005 .

[56]  Marina Papastergiou,et al.  Gender issues in Internet access and favourite Internet activities among Greek high school pupils inside and outside school , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[57]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[58]  S. Haberman The Analysis of Residuals in Cross-Classified Tables , 1973 .

[59]  Jocelyn Wishart Internet safety in emerging educational contexts , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[60]  Lori M. Weber,et al.  Who Participates and Why? , 2003 .