Space and Time in Macroeconomic Panel Data: Young Workers and State-Level Unemployment Revisited

A provocative paper by Shimer (2001) finds that state-level youth shares and unemployment rates are negatively correlated, in contrast to conventional assumptions about demographic effects on labor markets. This paper updates Shimer's regressions and shows that this surprising correlation essentially disappears when the end of the sample period is extended from 1996 to 2005. This shift does not occur because of a change in the underlying economy during the past decade. Rather, the presence of a cross-sectional (that is, spatial) correlation in the state-level data sharply reduces the precision of the earlier estimates, so that the true standard errors are several times larger than those originally reported. Using a longer sample period and some controls for spatial correlation in the regression, point estimates for the youth-share effect on unemployment are positive and close to what a conventional model would imply. Unfortunately, the standard errors remain very large. The difficulty of obtaining precise estimates with these data illustrates a potential pitfall in the use of regional panel data for macroeconomic analysis.

[1]  G. Kézdi.  Robust Standard Error Estimation in Fixed-Effects Panel Models , 2003 .

[2]  Jeffrey C. Fuhrer,et al.  Shifts in the Beveridge Curve, job matching, and labor market dynamics , 1997 .

[3]  Gary Solon,et al.  Estimating Autocorrelations in Fixed-Effects Models , 1984 .

[4]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and T are large , 2008 .

[5]  E. Arias,et al.  United States Census 2000 population with bridged race categories. , 2003, Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research.

[6]  David Card,et al.  Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania , 1993 .

[7]  Zhenlin Yang,et al.  QML estimation of dynamic panel data models with spatial errors , 2015 .

[8]  J. Paul Elhorst,et al.  Unconditional maximum likelihood estimation of dynamic models for spatial panels , 2003 .

[9]  M. Nerlove,et al.  Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects , 1988 .

[10]  Alok Bhargava,et al.  Serial Correlation and the Fixed Effects Model , 1982 .

[11]  D. Andrews.  Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation , 1991 .

[12]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[13]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[14]  R. Shimer.  The Impact of Young Workers on the Aggregate Labor Market , 1999 .

[15]  C. Hansen.  Asymptotic properties of a robust variance matrix estimator for panel data when T is large , 2007 .

[16]  Henry E. Siu,et al.  The Young, the Old, and the Restless: Demographics and Business Cycle Volatility , 2008 .

[17]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Robust Inference with Multi-Way Clustering , 2006 .

[18]  S. B. Thompson.  Simple Formulas for Standard Errors that Cluster by Both Firm and Time , 2009 .

[19]  Stephen Nickell,et al.  Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects , 1981 .

[20]  Stefano DellaVigna,et al.  Demographics and Industry Returns , 2007 .

[21]  J. Paul Elhorst,et al.  Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models , 2003 .

[22]  Christian Hansen,et al.  Generalized least squares inference in panel and multilevel models with serial correlation and fixed effects , 2007 .

[23]  H. Herzog.  Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies , 1992 .

[24]  L. Anselin.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[25]  Jonathan F. Pingle,et al.  The Recent Decline in the Labor Force Participation Rate and Its Implications for Potential Labor Supply , 2006 .

[26]  Daniel Hoechle.  Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions with Cross-Sectional Dependence , 2007 .