Improving the explanatory power of knowledge-based systems: an investigation of content and interface-based enhancements

This research investigates techniques that can improve the explanatory power of knowledge-based systems (KBS). Two types of enhancements are considered. First, deep explanations are textual descriptions that explain the underlying domain principles associated with system recommendations. Second, graphical hierarchies are used to represent the structure of the KBS rule base so that end-users can more easily visualize how a KBS reaches system recommendations. The experimental method was employed to investigate the effectiveness of the deep explanations and the hierarchic models. A 2/spl times/2 factorial design was used: one factor, interface type, is whether a subject interacted with a hierarchic interface or an informationally-equivalent flat interface; the second factor, explanations provision, is whether a subject was provided with deep explanation support or not. Multiple methods of measurements were employed to understand the effects of different treatments in the study. Problem-solving performance, as assessed by a series of tasks, and execution time were measured. Short answer questions were administered to all subjects to understand user preferences. Finally, to gain a richer understanding of problem-solving processes, all subject actions were captured in a computer log. From these logs, problem-solving strategies were reconstructed and analyzed. We found support for the benefits associated with interfaces having greater explanatory power according to the task-technology fit perspective: problem-solving performance was improved on certain tasks, and the correct problem-solving strategies were more likely to be adopted by subjects when they were provided with the appropriate support.

[1]  Paul John Steinbart,et al.  The Effects of Explanation Type and User Involvement on Learning from and Satisfaction with Expert Systems , 1998 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[3]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[5]  David E. Kieras,et al.  The Role of a Mental Model in Learning to Operate a Device. , 1984 .

[6]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Can Advance Organizers Influence Meaningful Learning? , 1979 .

[7]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[8]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An experimental program investigating color-enhanced and graphical information presentation: an integration of the findings , 1986, CACM.

[10]  William J. Clancey,et al.  The Epistemology of a Rule-Based Expert System - A Framework for Explanation , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Edward Tufte,et al.  Visual Explanations , 1997 .

[12]  William R. Swartout,et al.  XPLAIN: A System for Creating and Explaining Expert Consulting Programs , 1983, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Making the Transition from Print to Electronic Encyclopaedias: Adaptation of Mental Models , 1989, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[14]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[15]  S. Franklin Artificial Minds , 1995 .

[16]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[17]  Ho Geun Lee,et al.  A graph-based approach for rule integrity and maintainability in expert system maintenance , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Kathleen Ellen Moffitt,et al.  An empirical test of expert system explanation facility effects on incidental learning and decision-making , 1989 .

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Explanations From Intelligent Systems: Theoretical Foundations and Implications for Practice , 1999, MIS Q..

[20]  William J. Clancey,et al.  Strategic Explanations for a Diagnostic Consultation System , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[21]  G. Bower Organizational factors in memory. , 1970 .

[22]  Alison L. Kidd,et al.  Man-Machine Interface Issues in the Construction and Use of an Expert System , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[23]  L. Richard Ye,et al.  The Impact of Explanation Facilities in User Acceptance of Expert System Advice , 1995, MIS Q..

[24]  R. Mayer Models for Understanding , 1989 .

[25]  Mysore Ramaswamy,et al.  Using Directed Hypergraphs to Verity Rule-Based Expert Systems , 1997, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[26]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Structural analysis of science prose: can we increase problem-solving performance? , 1995, ASTR.

[27]  T. Grandon Gill,et al.  Early Expert Systems: Where are They Now? , 1995, MIS Q..

[28]  Frederick Hayes-Roth,et al.  The state of knowledge-based systems , 1994, CACM.

[29]  L. Richard Ye,et al.  The value of explanation in expert systems for auditing: An experimental investigation , 1995 .

[30]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[31]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The effects of contextualized access to knowledge on judgement , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..