Skewness Preference, Risk Taking and Expected Utility Maximisation

Available empirical evidence suggests that skewness preference plays an important role in understanding asset pricing and gambling. This paper establishes a skewness-comparability condition on probability distributions that is necessary and sufficient for any decision-maker's preferences over the distributions to depend on their means, variances, and third moments only. Under the condition, an Expected Utility maximizer's preferences for a larger mean, a smaller variance, and a larger third moment are shown to parallel, respectively, his preferences for a first-degree stochastic dominant improvement, a mean-preserving contraction, and a downside risk decrease and are characterized in terms of the von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function in exactly the same way. By showing that all Bernoulli distributions are mutually skewness comparable, we further show that in the wide range of economic models where these distributions are used individuals’ decisions under risk can be understood as trade-offs between mean, variance, and skewness. Our results on skewness-inducing transformations of random variables can also be applied to analyze the effects of progressive tax reforms on the incentive to make risky investments.

[1]  M. Rubinstein. The Fundamental Theorem of Parameter-Preference Security Valuation , 1973, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[2]  H. Levy Two-Moment Decision Models and Expected Utility Maximization: Comment , 1989 .

[3]  Joseph E. Stiglitz,et al.  The structure of investor preferences and asset returns, and separability in portfolio allocation: A contribution to the pure theory of mutual funds , 1970 .

[4]  W. Henry Chiu,et al.  Degree of downside risk aversion and self-protection , 2005 .

[5]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Mukhtar M. Ali Probability and Utility Estimates for Racetrack Bettors , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  B. Arnold,et al.  Measuring Skewness with Respect to the Mode , 1995 .

[8]  Miles S. Kimball Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large , 1989 .

[9]  Ian Walker,et al.  An economist's guide to lottery design. , 2001 .

[10]  Harris Schlesinger,et al.  Risk Aversion and the Propensities for Self-Insurance and Self-Protection , 1990 .

[11]  X. Henry Wang,et al.  Increasing outer risk , 2005 .

[12]  Alain Chateauneuf,et al.  The Principle of Strong Diminishing Transfer , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[13]  R. Litzenberger,et al.  SKEWNESS PREFERENCE AND THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS , 1976 .

[14]  K. Borch,et al.  A Note on Uncertainty and Indifference Curves , 1969 .

[15]  T. Garrett,et al.  Gamblers favor skewness, not risk: Further evidence from United States’ lottery games , 1999 .

[16]  Fred D. Arditti RISK AND THE REQUIRED RETURN ON EQUITY , 1967 .

[17]  Haim Levy,et al.  Efficient Portfolio Selection with Quadratic and Cubic Utility , 1970 .

[18]  A. Sandmo On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty , 1971 .

[19]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  An Experimental Measurement of Utility , 1951, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  W. Henry Chiu,et al.  Skewness Preference, Risk Aversion, and the Precedence Relations on Stochastic Changes , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[21]  I. Ehrlich,et al.  Market Insurance, Self-Insurance, and Self-Protection , 1972, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  H. Sinn Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty , 1983 .

[23]  J. Tobin Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk , 1958 .

[24]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Increasing risk: I. A definition , 1970 .

[25]  P. Lambert The Distribution and Redistribution of Income , 1989 .

[26]  V. Zwet Convex transformations of random variables , 1965 .

[27]  Agnar Sandmo,et al.  "Fixed Costs" and the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty: Reply , 1972 .

[28]  S. Tsiang The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis, Skewness Preference, and the Demand for Money , 1972 .

[29]  D. Peel,et al.  Utility and the Skewness of Return in Gambling , 2004 .

[30]  H. Markowitz The Utility of Wealth , 1952, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests , 1999 .

[32]  W. Henry Chiu,et al.  On the Propensity to Self-Protect , 2000 .

[33]  Louis Eeckhoudt,et al.  The impact of prudence on optimal prevention , 2005 .

[34]  John D. Tressler,et al.  Increasing Downside Risk , 1980 .

[35]  Joseph H. Golec,et al.  Bettors Love Skewness, Not Risk, at the Horse Track , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.