Frequent Pattern Mining of Eye-Tracking Records Partitioned into Cognitive Chunks

Assuming that scenes would be visually scanned by chunking information, we partitioned fixation sequences of web page viewers into chunks using isolate gaze point(s) as the delimiter. Fixations were coded in terms of the segments in a 5 × 5 mesh imposed on the screen. The identified chunks were mostly short, consisting of one or two fixations. These were analyzed with respect to the within- and between-chunk distances in the overall records and the patterns (i.e., subsequences) frequently shared among the records. Although the two types of distances were both dominated by zero- and one-block shifts, the primacy of the modal shifts was less prominent between chunks than within them. The lower primacy was compensated by the longer shifts. The patterns frequently extracted at three threshold levels were mostly simple, consisting of one or two chunks. The patterns revealed interesting properties as to segment differentiation and the directionality of the attentional shifts.

[1]  Noriyuki Matsuda,et al.  Networks Emerging from Shifts of Interests in Eye-Tracking Records , 2011, e Minds Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[3]  David Melcher,et al.  Dynamic, object-based remapping of visual features in trans-saccadic perception. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[4]  D. Burr,et al.  Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  Edward Cutrell,et al.  What are you looking for?: an eye-tracking study of information usage in web search , 2007, CHI.

[6]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[7]  D. Hubel,et al.  The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Qiming Chen,et al.  PrefixSpan,: mining sequential patterns efficiently by prefix-projected pattern growth , 2001, Proceedings 17th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[9]  Haruhiko Takeuchi,et al.  Joint Analysis of Static and Dynamic Importance in the Eye-Tracking Records of Web Page Readers , 2011 .

[10]  D. Melcher Selective attention and the active remapping of object features in trans-saccadic perception , 2009, Vision Research.

[11]  Umeshwar Dayal,et al.  PrefixSpan: Mining Sequential Patterns by Prefix-Projected Growth , 2001, ICDE 2001.

[12]  Jianyong Wang,et al.  Mining sequential patterns by pattern-growth: the PrefixSpan approach , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[13]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance The Nesting of Search Contexts Within Natural Scenes : Evidence From Contextual Cuing , 2010 .

[14]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases , 1994, VLDB.

[15]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  The Geometry of Web Search , 2004, BCS HCI.

[16]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  Fast algorithms for mining association rules , 1998, VLDB 1998.

[17]  N. Matsuda,et al.  Do Heavy and Light Users Differ in the Web-Page Viewing Patterns? Analysis of Their Eye-Tracking Records by Heat Maps and Networks of Transitions , 2011 .

[18]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs , 1999 .

[19]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data , 2006, Bioinform..