Bumblebee Flight in Heavy Turbulence.

High-resolution numerical simulations of a tethered model bumblebee in forward flight are performed superimposing homogeneous isotropic turbulent fluctuations to the uniform inflow. Despite tremendous variation in turbulence intensity, between 17% and 99% with respect to the mean flow, we do not find significant changes in cycle-averaged aerodynamic forces, moments, or flight power when averaged over realizations, compared to laminar inflow conditions. The variance of aerodynamic measures, however, significantly increases with increasing turbulence intensity, which may explain flight instabilities observed in freely flying bees.

[1]  L. J. Pohlen,et al.  The influence of free-stream disturbances on low Reynolds number airfoil experiments , 1983 .

[2]  R. Dudley,et al.  Mechanics of Forward Flight in Bumblebees: I. Kinematics and Morphology , 1990 .

[3]  R. Dudley,et al.  Mechanics of Forward Flight in Bumblebees: II. QUASI-STEADY LIFT AND POWER REQUIREMENTS , 1990 .

[4]  C. Ellington The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  Philippe Angot,et al.  A penalization method to take into account obstacles in incompressible viscous flows , 1999, Numerische Mathematik.

[6]  C. Ellington,et al.  Foraging costs in bumblebees: field conditions cause large individual differences , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.

[7]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. , 1999, Science.

[8]  S. N. Fry,et al.  The Aerodynamics of Free-Flight Maneuvers in Drosophila , 2003, Science.

[9]  Mitsuo Yokokawa,et al.  Energy dissipation rate and energy spectrum in high resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box , 2003 .

[10]  S. N. Fry,et al.  The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  K. Breuer,et al.  Aeromechanics in aeroecology: flight biology in the aerosphere. , 2007, Integrative and comparative biology.

[12]  S. Combes,et al.  Turbulence-driven instabilities limit insect flight performance , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  John Guckenheimer,et al.  Discovering the flight autostabilizer of fruit flies by inducing aerial stumbles , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[15]  Dmitry Pekurovsky,et al.  P3DFFT: A Framework for Parallel Computations of Fourier Transforms in Three Dimensions , 2012, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[16]  Rajat Mittal,et al.  Hawkmoth flight stability in turbulent vortex streets , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[17]  J S Humbert,et al.  Kinematic strategies for mitigating gust perturbations in insects , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[18]  S. Combes,et al.  Rolling with the flow: bumblebees flying in unsteady wakes , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  Mao Sun,et al.  Lateral dynamic flight stability of a model bumblebee in hovering and forward flight. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  Masateru Maeda,et al.  Ground Effect in Fruit Fly Hovering: A Three-Dimensional Computational Study , 2013 .

[21]  R. Mittal,et al.  Hawkmoth flight performance in tornado-like whirlwind vortices , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[22]  R. Dudley,et al.  Into turbulent air: size-dependent effects of von Kármán vortex streets on hummingbird flight kinematics and energetics , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  A. Biewener,et al.  Hummingbird flight stability and control in freestream turbulent winds , 2015, The Journal of Experimental Biology.

[24]  Kai Schneider,et al.  FluSI: A Novel Parallel Simulation Tool for Flapping Insect Flight Using a Fourier Method with Volume Penalization , 2015, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..