Urban data and city dashboards: Six key issues

This chapter considers the relationship between data and the city by critically examining six key issues with respect city dashboards: epistemology, scope and access, veracity and validity, usability and literacy, use and utility, and ethics. While city dashboards provide useful tools for evaluating and managing urban services, understanding and formulating policy, and creating public knowledge and counter-narratives, our analysis reveals a number of conceptual and practical shortcomings. In order for city dashboards to reach their full potential we advocate a number of related shifts in thinking and praxes and forward an agenda for addressing the issues we highlight. Our analysis is informed by our endeavours in building the Dublin Dashboard.

[1]  M. Holden.  Urban indicators and the integrative ideals of cities , 2006 .

[2]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Getting smarter about smart cities: Improving data privacy and data security , 2016 .

[3]  Shannon Mattern.  Methodolatry and the Art of Measure , 2013 .

[4]  J. Matthews.  Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life , 1996 .

[5]  T. Slater.  Territorial Stigmatization: Symbolic Defamation and the Contemporary Metropolis , 2017 .

[6]  A Hudson-Smith,et al.  Visualizing real-time data with an interactive iPad video wall , 2013 .

[7]  James J. Thomas,et al.  Defining Insight for Visual Analytics , 2009, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  Management by Measurement: Designing Key Indicators and Performance Measurement Systems , 2007 .

[9]  S. Guptill,et al.  Elements of Spatial Data Quality , 1995 .

[10]  R. Kitchin,et al.  The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism , 2013, GeoJournal.

[11]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[12]  K. Mori,et al.  Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI) , 2012 .

[13]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City , 2008 .

[14]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Modifiable Areal Unit Problem , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[15]  Richard Webber,et al.  Geodemographics, GIS and Neighbourhood Targeting , 2005 .

[16]  M. Batty.  The New Science of Cities , 2013 .

[17]  V. Maclaren.  Urban Sustainability Reporting , 1996 .

[18]  T. Edwin Chow,et al.  “We Know Who You Are and We Know Where You Live”: A Research Agenda for Web Demographics , 2013 .

[19]  D. Booher,et al.  Indicators for Sustainable Communities: A Strategy Building on Complexity Theory and Distributed Intelligence , 2000 .

[20]  Tracey P. Lauriault,et al.  Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards , 2015 .

[21]  Wayne Parsons,et al.  Not just steering but weaving: Relevant knowledge and the craft of building policy capacity and coherence , 2004 .

[22]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  The Praxis and Politics of Building Urban Dashboards , 2016 .

[23]  A Bayat,et al.  Cities: Reimagining the Urban , 2003 .

[24]  P. W. Hunter,et al.  The politics of large numbers. A history of statistical reasoning , 2006 .

[25]  Bill Franks,et al.  Taming The Big Data Tidal Wave: Finding Opportunities in Huge Data Streams with Advanced Analytics , 2012 .

[26]  L. Edwards.  Privacy, Security and Data Protection in Smart Cities: A Critical EU Law Perspective , 2016 .

[27]  H. Grupp,et al.  Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators? , 2004 .

[28]  Stephanie Boehm,et al.  Information Dashboard Design The Effective Visual Communication Of Data , 2016 .

[29]  M. Craglia,et al.  Towards the Development of Quality of Life Indicators in the ‘Digital’ City , 2004 .

[30]  Shannon Mattern,et al.  Mission Control: A History of the Urban Dashboard , 2015 .

[31]  A. Hezri,et al.  Sustainability indicator system and policy processes in Malaysia: a framework for utilisation and learning. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[32]  Shannon Mattern.  Interfacing Urban Intelligence , 2014 .

[33]  T. Block,et al.  Can Community Indicators Live Up to Their Expectations? The Case of the Flemish City Monitor for Livable and Sustainable Urban Development , 2010 .

[34]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Mastering the Information Age - Solving Problems with Visual Analytics , 2010 .

[35]  Pat Helland.  If you have too much data, then 'good enough' is good enough , 2011, CACM.

[36]  Johanna Drucker,et al.  Performative Materiality and Theoretical Approaches to Interface , 2013, Digit. Humanit. Q..

[37]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Improving the Veracity of Open and Real-Time Urban Data , 2016 .

[38]  Barbara Martini,et al.  The Data Revolution. Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences , 2016 .

[39]  Benoît Godin,et al.  The emergence of S&T indicators: why did governments supplement statistics with indicators? , 2003 .

[40]  J. Goss.  “We Know Who You Are and We Know Where You Live”: The Instrumental Rationality of Geodemographic Systems , 1995 .

[41]  A. Young.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[42]  R. Kitchin.  The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism , 2013 .

[43]  Silvia Gullino,et al.  Urban regeneration and democratization of information access: CitiStat experience in Baltimore. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  Tracey P. Lauriault,et al.  Openness, Transparency,Participation , 2017 .

[45]  Robert D. Behn,et al.  The PerformanceStat Potential: A Leadership Strategy for Producing Results , 2014 .