Numerical research on water hammer phenomenon of parallel pump-valve system by coupling FLUENT with RELAP5

Abstract Water hammer caused by system devices closing or opening are important factors that threat the safety of nuclear reactors. A coupling scheme is proposed to analyze water hammer in a designed parallel pump-valve system. The developed FLUENT/RELAP5 makes it possible to obtain three-dimensional (3-D) flow field of the key area with lower computer resource than traditional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis. The coupled code can reflect many sophisticated phenomena which system code ignores. In the developed coupling scheme, RELAP5 is compiled as a Dynamic Link Library (DLL). The compiled library is invoked as a subroutine at every time step by FLUENT. A testing case has been proposed to verify the implementation of the coupling scheme. Testing results prove the implementation of the coupling scheme successful and coupled results reliable. During the period of valve close, the coupled code predicts considerably well over movement of the valve element by the moving grid method. During the period of pumps start, three shock waves occur, and the mechanical loading oscillates continuously after 12 s. Moreover, the coupled results are compared with the standalone RELAP5 results. Contrast analysis represents that the coupled FLUENT/RELAP5 has the potential to obtain credible transient numerical results. The predicted 3-D transient characteristics directly reflect the generated pressure surges and forces in the designed pump-valve system, which is a fundamental guide for mitigating the threat of water hammer.

[1]  Kostadin Ivanov,et al.  Validation of Coupled Thermal-Hydraulic and Neutronics Codes for Safety Analysis by International Cooperations , 2007 .

[2]  D. L. Aumiller,et al.  AN INTEGRATED RELAP5-3D AND MUTLIPHASE CFD CODE SYSTEM UTILIZING A SEMI-implicit coupling technique , 2001 .

[3]  Wenxi Tian,et al.  Research on the designed emergency passive residual heat removal system during the station blackout scenario for CPR1000 , 2012 .

[4]  T. G. Beuthe.  Review of two-phase water hammer , 1997 .

[5]  Jerzy Marcinkiewicz,et al.  Experimental evaluation of ability of Relap5, Drako®, Flowmaster2™ and program using unsteady wall friction model to calculate water hammer loadings on pipelines , 2008 .

[6]  Anthony J. Baratta,et al.  Coupled Relap5 and Contain accident analysis using PVM , 1995 .

[7]  Gyorgy Ezsol,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study of steam condensation induced water hammer phenomena , 2010 .

[8]  J. Frizell.  Pressures Resulting From Changes of Velocity of Water in Pipes , 1898 .

[9]  Wenxi Tian,et al.  Thermal hydraulic characteristics analysis of direct residual heat removal system for China pressurized reactor , 2016 .

[10]  Robert Engel.  Analysis of fluid–structure interaction problems in nuclear reactor engineering , 2014 .

[11]  Wenxi Tian,et al.  Water hammer characteristics of integral pressurized water reactor primary loop , 2013 .

[12]  M. Bernard,et al.  The CATHARE code strategy and assessment , 1990 .

[13]  Annalisa Manera,et al.  One- and two-dimensional standing pressure waves and one-dimensional travelling pulses using the US-NRC nuclear systems analysis code TRACE , 2008 .

[14]  N. Ganesan,et al.  A new finite element formulation based on the velocity of flow for water hammer problems , 2005 .

[15]  Vincent Guinot,et al.  Riemann solvers for water hammer simulations by Godunov method , 2000 .

[16]  A Anderson,et al.  Menabrea's Note on Waterhammer: 1858 , 1976 .

[17]  B. E. Boyack,et al.  TRAC User's Guide , 1985 .

[18]  Lorenzo Allievi,et al.  Theory of water-hammer , 1925 .

[19]  D. L. Aumiller,et al.  A coupled RELAP5-3D/CFD methodology with a proof-of-principle calculation , 2001 .