Optimising the locations of thermally sensitive equipment in an aircraft crown compartment

Abstract A Design of Experiments (DoE) analysis was undertaken to generate a list of configurations for CFD numerical simulation of an aircraft crown compartment. Fitted regression models were built to predict the convective heat transfer coefficients of thermally sensitive dissipating elements located inside this compartment. These are namely the SEPDC and the Route G. Currently they are positioned close to the fuselage and it is of interest to optimise the heat transfer for reliability and performance purposes. Their locations and the external fuselage surface temperature were selected as input variables for the DoE. The models fit the CFD data with R 2 values ranging from 0.878 to 0.978, and predict that the optimum locations in terms of heat transfer are when the elements are positioned as close to the crown floor as possible ( S y and R y → min. limits ), where they come in direct contact with the air flow from the cabin ventilation system, and when they are positioned close to the centreline ( S x and R x → CL ). The methodology employed allows aircraft thermal designers to optimise equipment placement in confined areas of an aircraft during the design phase. The determined models should be incorporated into global aircraft numerical models to improve accuracy and reduce model size and computational time.

[1]  Marco Geron,et al.  Combination of CFD and DOE to analyze and improve the mass flow rate in urinary catheters. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  Ben Richard Hughes,et al.  Performance investigation of ground cooling for the airbus A380 in the United Arab Emirates , 2012 .

[3]  David Newport,et al.  Ventilation and internal structure effects on naturally induced flows in a static aircraft wing , 2012 .

[4]  Marco Geron,et al.  Combination of CFD and DOE to analyse solid particle erosion in elbows , 2009 .

[5]  M. Deaton,et al.  Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses , 1989 .

[6]  Jacqueline K. Telford,et al.  A Brief Introduction to Design of Experiments , 2007 .

[7]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Verification and validation. , 2005 .

[8]  Constantinos Soutis,et al.  Fibre reinforced composites in aircraft construction , 2005 .

[9]  J.A. Ortega,et al.  Moving towards a more electric aircraft , 2007, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[10]  Drew Landman,et al.  Global aircraft aero-propulsive linear parameter-varying model using design of experiments , 2012 .

[11]  R Fisher,et al.  Design of Experiments , 1936 .

[12]  Olivier Le Roux,et al.  Virtual testing of aircraft structures , 2011 .

[13]  Raimund Rolfes,et al.  Thermo-mechanical design aspects for primary composite structures of large transport aircraft * , 2001 .

[14]  Claus Wagner,et al.  Experimental and numerical simulations of idealized aircraft cabin flows , 2006 .

[15]  Matthias Kühn,et al.  Experimental parametric study of forced and mixed convection in a passenger aircraft cabin mock-up , 2009 .

[16]  Patrick J. Roache,et al.  Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering , 1998 .

[17]  A. Baker,et al.  Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures , 2004 .

[18]  Ingo Baumann,et al.  Impact of sound and vibration on health, travel comfort and performance of flight attendants and pilots , 2008 .

[19]  P. Roache.  QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS , 1997 .

[20]  Chao-Hsin Lin,et al.  Transport of expiratory droplets in an aircraft cabin. , 2011, Indoor air.

[21]  Zhao Zhang,et al.  State-of-the-art methods for studying air distributions in commercial airliner cabins , 2011, Building and Environment.

[22]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Error analysis for rendezvous phasing orbital control using design of experiments , 2012 .

[23]  Vincenzo Bianco,et al.  Numerical investigation of transient thermal and fluidynamic fields in an executive aircraft cabin , 2009 .