Using Hypermedia to Represent Emerging Student Understanding: Science Learners and Preservice Teachers

Publisher Summary The rationale for engaging students in constructing hypermedia artifacts is grounded in recent research on learning that emphasizes the active role of the learner, the importance of collaboration, and the need for authentic or meaningful contexts for problem solving. Building artifacts are one possible means for helping students develop conceptual understanding. Students engage in many elements of design when building artifacts. As students design and construct artifacts, they integrate new information into their existing conceptual framework, developing relationships among ideas. The degree to which students illustrate relationships among ideas within their artifacts provides insights regarding their level of understanding. Constructing artifacts provides the aforementioned learning opportunities both for science learners and preservice science teachers. Artifact building engages students in selecting and organizing concepts, representing those concepts, and developing connections among them. Technological tools and software offer new opportunities for creating artifacts. Technology enhances the value of student-constructed artifacts by allowing easy incorporation and linking multiple representations, interactive testing, and document revision.

[1]  L. Shulman,et al.  Teachers of Substance: Subject Matter Knowledge for Teaching , 2005 .

[2]  M. Linn,et al.  Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands? , 1991 .

[3]  D. Perkins.  Knowledge As Design , 1986 .

[4]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Breaking with Experience in Learning To Teach Mathematics: The Role of a Preservice Methods Course; Issue Paper 89-10. , 1989 .

[5]  J. Calderhead,et al.  Reflective teaching and teacher education , 1989 .

[6]  D. Kagan.  Professional Growth Among Preservice and Beginning Teachers , 1992 .

[7]  Carol S. Weinstein,et al.  Prospective elementary teachers' beliefs about teaching: Implications for teacher education☆ , 1990 .

[8]  M. Wittrock,et al.  Students' preconceptions of the nature of gases , 1993 .

[9]  M. Nakhleh.  Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions , 1992 .

[10]  R. Stavy.  Children's conception of changes in the state of matter: From liquid (or solid) to gas , 1990 .

[11]  Deborah C. Smith,et al.  The Construction of Subject Matter Knowledge in Primary Science Teaching. , 1989 .

[12]  Roger Osborne,et al.  Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water , 1983 .

[13]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[14]  Thomas W. Bean,et al.  Charting stages of preservice teacher development and reflection in a multicultural community through dialogue journal analysis , 1992 .

[15]  C. Feistritzer,et al.  The making of a teacher , 1984 .

[16]  Colette Daiute.  Multimedia Composing: Extending the Resources of Kindergarten to Writers across the Grades. , 1992 .

[17]  H. Borko,et al.  Cognition and Improvisation: Differences in Mathematics Instruction by Expert and Novice Teachers , 1989 .

[18]  Anthony S. Travis,et al.  Children's Views Concerning Phase Changes. , 1991 .

[19]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[20]  Joseph Nussbaum,et al.  Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study , 1978 .

[21]  G. Mcdiarmid,et al.  Challenging Prospective Teachers' Beliefs During Early Field Experience: A Quixotic Undertaking? , 1990 .

[22]  C. W. Anderson,et al.  Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules , 1990 .

[23]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Communities of Learning and Thinking, or A Context by Any Other Name , 1990 .

[24]  D. Ball.  The Mathematical Understandings That Prospective Teachers Bring to Teacher Education , 1990, The Elementary School Journal.

[25]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[26]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[27]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Using Technology to Support Students’ Artefact Construction in Science , 1998 .

[28]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[29]  Joseph Nussbaum,et al.  Pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross‐age study , 1981 .