How online usage of subscription‐based journalism and mass communication research journal articles predicts citations

This study examines the predicting power of content and non‐content article attributes and of total online usage on short‐term citations of subscription‐based journal articles. It examines articles published in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly ( JMCQ ) between 2012 and 2014. The results indicate that the total online usage (full article and abstract page views and article downloads) can be a very strong predictor for citations and can even wipe out the effects of hot topics. Mobile and social media are the media of study most cited in the articles studied. There is no identifiable gender citation gap as authors of both genders equally enjoy their share in the top 10 most cited list. The only gender‐related finding is that female authors dominate gender‐related topics. We conclude that journal publishers wishing to obtain a quick proxy measure of citation potential for journal articles should consult their total online usage. Furthermore, due to the prevalent bias on topics regarding citation frequency, administrators and librarians are highly advised to take topics into consideration when determining scholars’ citation performance.

[1]  G. Holden,et al.  Bibliometrics , 2005, Social work in health care.

[2]  Robert K. Toutkoushian,et al.  Using Citations to Measure Sex Discrimination in Faculty Salaries , 2017 .

[3]  Jiyoung Cha,et al.  Substitutability between Online Video Platforms and Television , 2012 .

[4]  K. Olds,et al.  Circulating economic geographies: citation patterns and citation behaviour in economic geography, 1982?2006 , 2007 .

[5]  Vwani P. Roychowdhury,et al.  Read Before You Cite! , 2003, Complex Syst..

[6]  Amy Schmitz Weiss,et al.  Exploring News Apps and Location-Based Services on the Smartphone: , 2013 .

[7]  Hans Peter Peters,et al.  Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Kimberly Wilmot Voss,et al.  Taking Chances and Making Changes , 2014 .

[9]  Brian D. Cameron,et al.  Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications , 2005 .

[10]  David M. Walker,et al.  Citation pattern and lifespan: a comparison of discipline, institution, and individual , 2011, Scientometrics.

[11]  Brian E. Weeks,et al.  Predicting Dissemination of News Content in Social Media , 2013 .

[12]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Building Buzz , 2014 .

[13]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis: A critical review , 1989, JASIS.

[14]  Ángel Borrego,et al.  Scientific output and impact of postdoctoral scientists: a gender perspective , 2010, Scientometrics.

[15]  Kwok Leung,et al.  The Glory and Tyranny of Citation Impact: An East Asian Perspective , 2007 .

[16]  Sylvia M. Chan-Olmsted,et al.  Mobile News Adoption among Young Adults , 2013 .

[17]  Bill Reader.  Free Press vs. Free Speech? The Rhetoric of “Civility” in Regard to Anonymous Online Comments , 2012 .

[18]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  Predicting a Scientific Community’s Response to an Article , 2011, EMNLP.

[19]  H. Ibarra.  Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[20]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Mary Beth Oliver,et al.  The Effect of Narrative News Format on Empathy for Stigmatized Groups , 2012 .

[22]  G. Eysenbach.  The Open Access Advantage , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[23]  Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar,et al.  The impact of scientific journals of communication: Comparing Google Scholar Metrics, Web of Science and Scopus , 2013 .

[24]  Neil J. Gemmell,et al.  Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance , 2006, PloS one.

[25]  Eyun‐Jung Ki,et al.  Social Media Research in Advertising, Communication, Marketing, and Public Relations, 1997–2010 , 2012 .

[26]  Stephen M. Horan.  Is an Article in a Top Journal a Top Article , 2005 .

[27]  Anne-Wil Harzing.  A Better Metric to Measure Journal Impact in Economics & Business ? , 2007 .

[28]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[29]  Nana Turk,et al.  Citation impact of Open Access journals , 2008 .

[30]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Patterns of citations of open access and non-open access conservation biology journal papers and book chapters. , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[32]  T. Hack,et al.  Research citation analysis of nursing academics in Canada: identifying success indicators. , 2010, Journal of advanced nursing.

[33]  M. V. Simkin,et al.  Do you sincerely want to be cited? Or: read before you cite , 2006 .

[34]  H. Ibarra.  Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework , 1993 .

[35]  Michael A. Rodriguez,et al.  Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science , 2009, PloS one.

[36]  Mark Coddington,et al.  Defending a Paradigm by Patrolling a Boundary , 2012 .

[37]  Francis L. F. Lee,et al.  What Does It Take for Women Journalists to Gain Professional Recognition? , 2013 .

[38]  Ingrid Bachmann,et al.  Where Are the Women? The Presence of Female Columnists in U.S. Opinion Pages , 2014 .

[39]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  The Matilda Effect in Science Communication , 2013 .

[40]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[41]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  The Matilda Effect—Role Congruity Effects on Scholarly Communication , 2013, Commun. Res..

[42]  Liwen Vaughan,et al.  Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination , 2006 .

[43]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[44]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[45]  Adrian Letchford,et al.  The advantage of short paper titles , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[46]  Tao Zhang,et al.  How Media Scholars’ Attributes Affect Their Ratings of Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly * , 2015 .

[47]  J. S. Long,et al.  Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity , 1992 .