Effects of mixing in threshold models of social behavior

We consider the dynamics of an extension of the influential Granovetter model of social behavior, where individuals are affected by their personal preferences and observation of the neighbors' behavior. Individuals are arranged in a network (usually the square lattice), and each has a state and a fixed threshold for behavior changes. We simulate the system asynchronously by picking a random individual and we either update its state or exchange it with another randomly chosen individual (mixing). We describe the dynamics analytically in the fast-mixing limit by using the mean-field approximation and investigate it mainly numerically in the case of finite mixing. We show that the dynamics converge to a manifold in state space, which determines the possible equilibria, and show how to estimate the projection of this manifold by using simulated trajectories, emitted from different initial points. We show that the effects of considering the network can be decomposed into finite-neighborhood effects, and finite-mixing-rate effects, which have qualitatively similar effects. Both of these effects increase the tendency of the system to move from a less-desired equilibrium to the "ground state." Our findings can be used to probe shifts in behavioral norms and have implications for the role of information flow in determining when social norms that have become unpopular in particular communities (such as foot binding or female genital cutting) persist or vanish.

[1]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[2]  T. Liggett,et al.  Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes , 1999 .

[3]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[4]  A. Kennedy MUTILATION AND BEAUTIFICATION , 2009 .

[5]  Shore,et al.  Hysteresis and hierarchies: Dynamics of disorder-driven first-order phase transformations. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[6]  Irene Giardina,et al.  Random Fields and Spin Glasses: Contents , 2006 .

[7]  S. Redner,et al.  Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spin systems. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[8]  S. Redner,et al.  A Kinetic View of Statistical Physics , 2010 .

[9]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[10]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[11]  C. Tessone,et al.  Finite size effects in the dynamics of opinion formation , 2006, physics/0607252.

[12]  M. Miguel Social and strategic imitation: the way to , 2012 .

[13]  B. Bolker,et al.  Using Moment Equations to Understand Stochastically Driven Spatial Pattern Formation in Ecological Systems , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[14]  T. Munakata,et al.  Hysteresis and complexity in the mean-field random-field Ising model: The soft-spin version , 2009, 0901.4852.

[15]  Maxi San Miguel,et al.  Social and strategic imitation: the way to consensus , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  On moment closures for population dynamics in continuous space. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  Bernd Blasius,et al.  Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems , 1999, Nature.

[20]  鈴木 増雄 Time-Dependent Statistics of the Ising Model , 1965 .

[21]  G. Mackie Ending Footbinding and Infibulation: A Convention Account , 1996 .

[22]  William A. Brock,et al.  Discrete Choice with Social Interactions , 2001 .

[23]  Irene Giardina,et al.  Random Fields and Spin Glasses: A Field Theory Approach , 2010 .

[24]  M. Gadallah,et al.  Prevalence of female genital cutting among Egyptian girls. , 2008, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[25]  C. Bicchieri The grammar of society: the nature and dynamics of social norms , 2005 .

[26]  David J. Murrell,et al.  On the emergent spatial structure of size‐structured populations: when does self‐thinning lead to a reduction in clustering? , 2009 .

[27]  S. Levin Dispersion and Population Interactions , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[28]  A. Leggett,et al.  Bose-Einstein condensation in the alkali gases: Some fundamental concepts , 2001 .

[29]  T. Reichenbach,et al.  Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock–paper–scissors games , 2007, Nature.

[30]  D Cassi,et al.  Efficiency of information spreading in a population of diffusing agents. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Critical phenomena in complex networks , 2007, ArXiv.

[32]  Elena Agliari,et al.  A statistical mechanics approach to Granovetter theory , 2010, ArXiv.