Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis

The current article suggests a possible synthesis of Skinner’s (1957) treatment of verbal behavior with the more recent behavioral interpretation of language known as relational frame theory. The rationale for attempting to combine these two approaches is first outlined. Subsequently, each of the verbal operants described by Skinner is examined and subjected to a relational frame analysis. In each case, two types of operants are identified; one based on direct contingencies of reinforcement and the other based on arbitrarily applicable relational responding. The latter operants are labeled verbal because they can be distinguished from other forms of social behavior, and they appear to possess the symbolic or referential qualities often ascribed to human language. By applying relational frame theory to Skinner’s verbal operants, we aim to contribute towards the development of a modern behavior-analytic research agenda in human language and cognition.

[1]  D. Barnes,et al.  A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  S. Hayes,et al.  14 Stimulus classes and stimulus relations: Arbitrarily applicable relational responding as an operant , 1996 .

[3]  S. Hayes,et al.  Some Applied Implications of a Contemporary Behavior-Analytic Account of Verbal Events , 1993, The Behavior analyst.

[4]  D. Barnes,et al.  Establishing Equivalence Relations Using a Respondent-Type Training Procedure , 1996 .

[5]  B. Roche,et al.  A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. , 1997, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  L J Hayes,et al.  Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. , 1993, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Generalized language learning by children with severe mental retardation: effects of peers' expressive modeling. , 1989, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  Bryan Roche,et al.  Relational Frame Theory and Stimulus Equivalence are Fundamentally Different: A Reply to Saunders’ Commentary , 1996 .

[9]  S. Hayes,et al.  Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  Simon Dymond,et al.  A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition , 1996 .

[11]  D. Barnes,et al.  Connectionist Models of Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding: A Possible Role for the Hippocampal System , 1997 .

[12]  Linda J. Hayes,et al.  The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. , 1989 .

[13]  B. Roche,et al.  Relational frame theory and the experimental analysis of human sexuality , 1997 .

[14]  D. Barnes,et al.  A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  B F Skinner,et al.  The evolution of verbal behavior. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  D. Barnes,et al.  Stimulus Equivalence and Connectionism: Implications for Behavior Analysis and Cognitive Science , 1993 .

[17]  D. Barnes,et al.  Relating Equivalence Relations to Equivalence Relations: A Relational Framing Model of Complex Human Functioning , 1997, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[18]  S. Hayes.  Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. , 1994 .

[19]  Noam Chomsky.  Review of B.F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior , 1959 .

[20]  M. Sundberg,et al.  Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations , 1987, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[21]  D. Barnes,et al.  Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory , 1994 .

[22]  Dermot Barnes-Holmes,et al.  Explaining Complex Behavior: Two Perspectives on the Concept Of Generalized Operant Classes , 2000 .

[23]  D. Barnes,et al.  Radical Behaviorism, Stimulus Equivalence, and Human Cognition , 1991 .

[24]  S. Hayes,et al.  Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. , 1992 .

[25]  G. Karlan,et al.  Establishing generalized verb-noun instruction-following skills in retarded children. , 1976, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[26]  S. Hayes,et al.  Chapter 3 Metaphor, meaning and relational frame theory , 1997 .

[27]  Murray Sidman,et al.  Equivalence Relations and Behavior: A Research Story , 1994 .