Update of Long-Term Pavement Performance Manual Distress Data Variability: Bias and Precision

Pavement distress surveys based upon field interpretation and manual mapping and recording of the distress information on paper forms has been used in the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program to collect important pavement condition and distress data. Although this manual method was used in the past as a backup to the 35-mm black and white photographic-based method, recently the use of manual distress survey methods has increased in intensity and coverage. To promote uniformity and consistency of distress data collection, one of the early LTPP efforts was to develop standard definitions, measurement procedures and data collection forms. Various quality control and quality assurance functions have also been implemented to provide for high quality data. However, despite these efforts, manual surveys are still based upon a single rater’s subjective classification of distresses present in the field. Recognizing that rater variability exists, a study was undertaken by FHWA to assess the level of variability between individual distress raters and to address the potential precision and bias. Results from nine LTPP distress rater-accreditation workshops conducted during the period of 1992 to 1996 were used as the source of data. Analyses of those data led to numerous observations and conclusions regarding the bias and precision of LTPP distress data. Because LTPP distress data are to be used in the development of pavement performance prediction models, it is believed that the level of variability found in this study should be reduced to increase its potential usage in the development of such models. A number of recommendations to improve the variability associated with manual distress surveys data are included.