Variation of verbal constructions in Estonian dialects
暂无分享,去创建一个
Liina Lindström | John Nerbonne | Kadri Muischnek | Kristel Uiboaed | Cornelius Hasselblatt | K. Muischnek | J. Nerbonne | L. Lindström | Kristel Uiboaed | C. Hasselblatt
[1] John Nerbonne,et al. The forests behind the trees , 2009 .
[2] A. Goldberg. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .
[3] Jussi Ylikoski,et al. Defining non-finites: Action nominals, converbs and infinitives , 2003 .
[4] John Nerbonne,et al. Toward a dialectological yardstick* , 2007, J. Quant. Linguistics.
[5] Helle Metslang,et al. Some Notes on Proximative and Avertive in Estonian , 2009 .
[6] Liina Lindström,et al. Parsing Corpus of Estonian Dialects , 2009 .
[7] Wilbert Jan Heeringa. Measuring dialect pronunciation differences using Levenshtein distance , 2004 .
[8] William Labov,et al. The Social Stratification of English in New York City: 1966–2006 , 2006 .
[9] A C C Gibbs,et al. Data Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.
[10] Mati Erelt,et al. Eesti keele käsiraamat , 2007 .
[11] Ilona Tragel. Eesti keele tuumverbid , 2003 .
[12] M. Greenacre. Correspondence analysis in practice , 1993 .
[13] Cristina Guardiano,et al. Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness , 2009 .
[14] Stefan Evert,et al. The Statistics of Word Cooccur-rences: Word Pairs and Collocations , 2004 .
[15] Benedikt Szmrecsanyi,et al. The morphosyntax of varieties of English worldwide: A quantitative perspective , 2009 .
[16] H. J. Bennis,et al. A Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch dialects (SAND) , 2000 .
[17] Ted Pedersen,et al. Fishing for Exactness , 1996, ArXiv.
[18] John Nerbonne,et al. Projecting Dialect Distances to Geography: Bootstrap Clustering vs. Noisy Clustering , 2007, GfKl.
[19] Ilona Tragel,,et al. Grammaticalization of Estonian saama ‘to get’ , 2012 .
[20] S. Gries,et al. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .
[21] D. S. Sivia,et al. Data Analysis , 1996, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
[22] David Heap,et al. La variation grammaticale en géolinguistique, les pronoms sujet en roman central , 1997 .
[23] W. Heeringa,et al. Associations among linguistic levels , 2009 .
[24] Jan-Ola Östman,et al. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch , 2004 .
[25] Daniel Wiechmann. On the computation of collostruction strength: Testing measures of association as expressions of lexical bias , 2008 .
[26] M. Dunn,et al. Structural Phylogeny in Historical Linguistics: Methodological Explorations Applied in Island Melanesia , 2008 .
[27] Kadri Muischnek. Verbi ja noomeni püsiühendid eesti keeles , 2006 .
[28] Mirjam Fried,et al. Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective , 2004 .
[29] Mati Erelt. Estonian : typological studies , 2001 .
[30] L. Cronbach. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .
[31] Stefan Th. Gries,et al. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions , 2003 .
[32] Liina Lindström,et al. Finiitverbi asend lauses. Sõnajärg ja seda mõjutavad tegurid suulises eesti keeles , 2005 .
[33] C. Fillmore,et al. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .
[34] W. Labov. The social stratification of English in New York City , 1969 .
[35] Wladyslaw Cichocki,et al. Geographic Variation in Acadian French /r /: What Can Correspondence Analysis Contribute Toward Explanation? , 2006, Lit. Linguistic Comput..
[36] Ludovic Lebart,et al. Exploring Textual Data , 1997 .
[37] Liina Lindström,et al. The possessive perfect construction in Estonian , 2010 .
[38] Charlotte Gooskens,et al. Gabmap – A web application for dialectology. , 2011 .