A GA approach to compare ORPF objective functions including Secondary Voltage Regulation

Abstract In the past, with vertically integrate utilities, Optimal Reactive Power Flow (ORPF) procedures were designed to minimize power system losses, keeping the voltage profile in an acceptable range. Nowadays, in the market environment, a new formulation of the ORPF, aimed at the system security maximization, is necessary. In particular, as congestions and overloads are usually taken into account by the energy market rules, voltage security could become the main goal of ORPFs. Voltage problems are caused by the increase in power transfer among areas of interconnected systems, by the lack of reactive power support and by the increasing limitations of transmission networks. In this paper, an analysis of several ORPF Objective Functions (OFs) is reported, where the goal considered is the network security maximization. To solve the optimization problem for the considered OFs, a Genetic Algorithm (GA) approach has been adopted, together with a particular formulation of the Power Flow (PF) taking into account the Secondary Voltage Regulation (SVR). Tests are performed on a detailed model of the Italian power system, comparing the results in terms of system losses, reactive power required, loadability limits and voltage collapse indices. Furthermore, the improvements achievable with the adoption of the SVR in the new market environment have been investigated.

[1]  Corsi,et al.  Evaluation of load margins with respect to voltage collapse in presence of secondary and tertiary voltage regulation , 2001 .

[2]  R. E. Marsten,et al.  A direct nonlinear predictor-corrector primal-dual interior point algorithm for optimal power flows , 1993 .

[3]  Claudio A. Canizares,et al.  On the linear profile of indices for the prediction of saddle-node and limit-induced bifurcation points in power systems , 2003 .

[4]  A. Berizzi,et al.  Singular value decomposition for an ORPF formulation in presence of SVR , 2006, MELECON 2006 - 2006 IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference.

[5]  O. Alsac,et al.  Optimal Load Flow with Steady-State Security , 1974 .

[6]  A. Berizzi,et al.  Reactive power management in the Italian system: a proposal for an economic compensation , 2006, MELECON 2006 - 2006 IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference.

[7]  Anjan Bose,et al.  A NEW SCHEME FOR VOLTAGE CONTROL IN A COMPETITIVE ANCILLARY SERVICE MARKET , 2002 .

[8]  Ross Baldick Reactive issues: Reactive power in restructured markets , 2004 .

[9]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[10]  Marco Merlo,et al.  THE HIERARCHICAL VOLTAGE CONTROL TO FACE THE INCREASE OF UNCERTAINTY DUE TO MARKET STRUCTURES , 2008 .

[11]  R.J. Thomas,et al.  On Computational Issues of Market-Based Optimal Power Flow , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  I. Dobson Observations on the geometry of saddle node bifurcation and voltage collapse in electrical power systems , 1992 .

[13]  G. Moreschini,et al.  Coordination between the reactive power scheduling function and the hierarchical voltage control of the EHV ENEL system , 1995 .

[14]  Alberto Berizzi,et al.  System-area operating margin assessment and security enhancement against voltage collapse , 1996 .

[15]  Alberto Berizzi,et al.  First and second order methods for voltage collapse assessment and security enhancement , 1998 .

[16]  Fang Liu,et al.  A hybrid genetic algorithm-interior point method for optimal reactive power flow , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Alberto Berizzi,et al.  Determination of the N-1 security maximum transfer capability through power corridors , 2000, 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37077).

[18]  Gilsoo Jang,et al.  Development of voltage stability constrained optimal power flow (VSCOPF) , 2001, 2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262).

[19]  A. Berizzi,et al.  Comparison of voltage security constrained optimal power flow techniques , 2001, 2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262).

[20]  J. Carpentier,et al.  VOLTAGE COLLAPSE PROXIMITY INDICATORS COMPUTED FROM AN OPTIMAL POWER FLOW , 1984 .

[21]  M. Innorta,et al.  Evaluation of Economy and/or Security Oriented Objective Functions for Reactive Power Scheduling in Large Scale Systems , 1983, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[22]  G. Chicco,et al.  Unbundled Reactive Support Service: Key Characteristics and Dominant Cost Component , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[23]  K. Bhattacharya,et al.  Reactive Power as an Ancillary Service , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[24]  Cristian Bovo,et al.  Online fuzzy voltage collapse risk quantification , 2009 .

[25]  David Beasley,et al.  An overview of genetic algorithms: Part 1 , 1993 .

[26]  P. Kundur,et al.  Valuation of Dynamic Reactive Power Support Services for Transmission Access , 2001 .

[27]  Milan S. Ćalović,et al.  Voltage reactive security analysis in power systems with automatic secondary voltage control , 1994 .

[28]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Secondary voltage control: nonlinear selection of pilot buses, design of an optimal control law, and simulation results , 1998 .