Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: reactivity and the ABS list

The case for using academic journals lists is critically scrutinised. An effect of their use, it argued, is to stifle diversity and constrict scholarly innovation. A monoculture is fostered in which a preoccupation with shoehorning research into a form prized by elite, US-oriented journals overrides a concern to maintain and enrich the diversity of topics, the range of methods and the plurality of perspectives engaged in business and management research. Use of a particular journal list, such as the one prepared by the Association of Business Schools (ABS), can come to dominate the scholarly terrain of a particular discipline with consequences that can be damaging to funding as well as to research culture.

[1]  Maria Paola Scaparra,et al.  Estimating Business and Management journal quality from the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK , 2012, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  C. Hall,et al.  Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism , 2011 .

[3]  John Hassard,et al.  Research Audits and their Financial Consequences , 2011 .

[4]  John Mingers,et al.  Moulding the One-Dimensional Academic: The Performative Effects of Journal Ranking Lists , 2010 .

[5]  T. Burgess,et al.  Editorial Board Membership of Management and Business Journals: A Social Network Analysis Study of the Financial Times 40 , 2010 .

[6]  C. Grey.  Organizing Studies: Publications, Politics and Polemic , 2010 .

[7]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  Thirty Years of Organization Studies: Enduring Themes in a Changing Institutional Field , 2010 .

[8]  Peter Erskine Wells.  The ABS rankings of journal quality: an exercise in delusion , 2010 .

[9]  C. Harvey,et al.  Journal rankings and the ABS Journal Quality Guide , 2009 .

[10]  R. Wensley.  Research in UK Business Schools or management research in the UK , 2009 .

[11]  Garry Gray,et al.  Organizational Self-Censorship: Corporate Sponsorship, Nonprofit Funding, and the Educational Experience , 2009 .

[12]  The Importance of “Niche” Journals To New Business-Communication Academics— and To All of Us , 2009 .

[13]  N. Adler,et al.  When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings , 2009 .

[14]  Robert A. Giacalone,et al.  Academic Rankings in Research Institutions: A Case of Skewed Mind-Sets and Professional Amnesia , 2009 .

[15]  S. Nkomo,et al.  The Seductive Power of Academic Journal Rankings: Challenges of Searching for the Otherwise , 2009 .

[16]  Mustafa Özbilgin.  From Journal Rankings to Making Sense of the World , 2009 .

[17]  Charles Harvey,et al.  Modelling the outcome of the UK business and management studies RAE 2008 with reference to the ABS Journal Quality Guide , 2009 .

[18]  Janne Tienari,et al.  Hegemonic Academic Practices: Experiences of Publishing from the Periphery , 2008 .

[19]  Martin Parker,et al.  Speaking Out: The Responsibilities of Management Intellectuals: A Survey , 2008 .

[20]  S. Rynes.  Afterword: To the Next 50 Years , 2007 .

[21]  Sean L. Humpherys,et al.  A Scientometric Study of the Perceived Quality of Business and Technical Communication Journals , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[22]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research , 2007 .

[23]  W. Espeland,et al.  Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  J. Kam.  Ring a Ring O' Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies , 2007 .

[25]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  Living in Mythical Spaces , 2007 .

[26]  E. Garfield.  Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  How Much Better are the Most Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[28]  L. Downing,et al.  The Iconography of Asphyxiophilia: From Fantasmatic Fetish to Forensic Fact , 2004 .

[29]  Michael Rowlinson,et al.  Journal Rankings in Business and Management and the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK , 2004 .

[30]  John D. Aram,et al.  Bridging Scholarship in Management: Epistemological Reflections , 2003 .

[31]  Karen Barad.  Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[32]  S. Clegg.  “Lives in the Balance”: A Comment on Hinings and Greenwood's “Disconnects and Consequences in Organization Theory?”• , 2002 .

[33]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  ASQ Forum , 2002 .

[34]  D. Tranfield,et al.  The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy , 1998 .

[35]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Sweeping it under the carpet: The role of accountancy firms in moneylaundering , 1998 .

[36]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[37]  J. Uva.  Review: autoerotic asphyxiation in the United States. , 1995, Journal of forensic sciences.

[38]  D. Hambrick.  What if the Academy Actually Mattered , 1994 .

[39]  Per O. Seglen,et al.  The Skewness of Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[40]  S. Žižek.  The sublime object of ideology , 1989 .

[41]  E GARFIELD,et al.  Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. , 2006, Science.