Supplier selection by the new AR-IDEA model

Traditionally, supplier-selection models have been based on cardinal data with less emphasis on ordinal data. However, with the widespread use of manufacturing philosophies such as just-in-time (JIT), emphasis has shifted to the simultaneous consideration of cardinal and ordinal data in the supplier-selection process. The application of data envelopment analysis (DEA) for supplier-selection problems is based on total flexibility of the weights. However, the problem of allowing total flexibility of the weights is that the values of the weights obtained by solving the unrestricted DEA program are often in contradiction to prior views or additional available information. The objective of this paper is to propose a new pair of assurance region-imprecise data envelopment analysis (AR-IDEA) model for selecting the best suppliers in the presence of both weight restrictions and imprecise data. A numerical example demonstrates the application of the proposed method.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[2]  R. C. Baker,et al.  A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[4]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Vendor Performance With Supply Risk: A Chance-Constrained DEA Approach , 2006 .

[5]  Darryl D. Wilson,et al.  Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance , 2000 .

[6]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Restricting virtual weights in data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[8]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[9]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP , 2003 .

[10]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[11]  G. Kannan,et al.  Design of an integrated supplier selection and multi-echelon distribution inventory model in a built-to-order supply chain environment , 2006 .

[12]  Chinyao Low,et al.  Supplier evaluation and selection via Taguchi loss functions and an AHP , 2006 .

[13]  Gang Yu,et al.  An Illustrative Application of Idea (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company , 2001, Oper. Res..

[14]  S. Talluri,et al.  A model for performance monitoring of suppliers , 2002 .

[15]  M. Braglia,et al.  A quality assurance‐oriented methodology for handling trade‐offs in supplier selection , 2000 .

[16]  C. Weber A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance , 1996 .

[17]  David Mendez,et al.  An analytical method for benchmarking best peer suppliers , 2001 .

[18]  Fong-Yuen Ding,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement , 2000 .

[19]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[20]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): A review and improvement with an application , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  W. Cooper,et al.  Idea and Ar-Idea: Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in Dea , 1999 .

[23]  J. Current,et al.  An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ , 2000 .

[24]  William W. Cooper,et al.  IDEA (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) with CMDs (Column Maximum Decision Making Units) , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[25]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..