Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG

Listening to speech in noise is effortful, particularly for people with hearing impairment. While it is known that effort is related to a complex interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes, the cognitive and neurophysiological mechanisms contributing to effortful listening remain unknown. Therefore, a reliable physiological measure to assess effort remains elusive. This study aimed to determine whether pupil dilation and alpha power change, two physiological measures suggested to index listening effort, assess similar processes. Listening effort was manipulated by parametrically varying spectral resolution (16- and 6-channel noise vocoding) and speech reception thresholds (SRT; 50% and 80%) while 19 young, normal-hearing adults performed a speech recognition task in noise. Results of off-line sentence scoring showed discrepancies between the target SRTs and the true performance obtained during the speech recognition task. For example, in the SRT80% condition, participants scored an average of 64.7%. Participants’ true performance levels were therefore used for subsequent statistical modelling. Results showed that both measures appeared to be sensitive to changes in spectral resolution (channel vocoding), while pupil dilation only was also significantly related to their true performance levels (%) and task accuracy (i.e., whether the response was correctly or partially recalled). The two measures were not correlated, suggesting they each may reflect different cognitive processes involved in listening effort. This combination of findings contributes to a growing body of research aiming to develop an objective measure of listening effort.

[1]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL) , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[2]  Daniel J. Strauss,et al.  Neural correlates of listening effort related factors: Influence of age and hearing impairment , 2013, Brain Research Bulletin.

[3]  Cas Smits,et al.  The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  B. Hornsby,et al.  Subjective fatigue in children with hearing loss: some preliminary findings. , 2014, American journal of audiology.

[5]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  The Influence of Age, Hearing, and Working Memory on the Speech Comprehension Benefit Derived from an Automatic Speech Recognition System , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[6]  Cas Smits,et al.  The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M. Laine,et al.  Effects of normal aging on event-related desynchronization/synchronization during a memory task in humans , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[9]  E. Basar,et al.  Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[10]  I M Ventry,et al.  Hearing impairment and social isolation in the elderly. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  Ronny K. Ibrahim,et al.  Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Left temporal alpha-band activity reflects single word intelligibility , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[13]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Loss in Older Adulthood , 2005 .

[14]  Pamela Souza,et al.  Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[15]  W. Klimesch Memory processes, brain oscillations and EEG synchronization. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  Stefano Federici,et al.  Gaze and eye-tracking solutions for psychological research , 2012, Cognitive Processing.

[17]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Ranjana K. Mehta,et al.  Influence of mental workload on muscle endurance, fatigue, and recovery during intermittent static work , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[19]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Alpha Rhythms in Audition: Cognitive and Clinical Perspectives , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[20]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[21]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[22]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[23]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  T. Lunner,et al.  Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[25]  M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Cognitive aging and auditory information processing , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[26]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Ingo Fründ,et al.  Human gamma-band activity: A review on cognitive and behavioral correlates and network models , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[28]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Processing Load Induced by Informational Masking Is Related to Linguistic Abilities , 2012, International journal of otolaryngology.

[29]  A. Zekveld,et al.  The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Christian Haarala Björnberg,et al.  Brain oscillatory 1–30Hz EEG ERD/ERS responses during the different stages of an auditory memory search task , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  J Vanden Berghe,et al.  Speech Recognition in Noise for Cochlear Implantees with a Two-Microphone Monaural Adaptive Noise Reduction System , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[32]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Occupational performance: Comparing normally-hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[33]  J. Siegrist Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. , 1996, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[34]  Matthew B. Winn,et al.  The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[35]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Cognitive processing load during listening is reduced more by decreasing voice similarity than by increasing spatial separation between target and masker speech , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[36]  Birgitta Larsby,et al.  Cognitive performance and perceived effort in speech processing tasks: effects of different noise backgrounds in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[37]  Adriana A. Zekveld,et al.  Top–down and bottom–up processes in speech comprehension , 2006, NeuroImage.

[38]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  T. Lunner,et al.  Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU) , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[40]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[41]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[42]  T. Lunner,et al.  The emergence of cognitive hearing science. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[43]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[44]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Channel-Capacity, Intelligibility and Immediate Memory , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  Burkhard Maess,et al.  Adverse Listening Conditions and Memory Load Drive a Common Alpha Oscillatory Network , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[47]  W. Klimesch Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[49]  Magnus Emilsson,et al.  Cognitive skills and the effect of noise on perceived effort in employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing. , 2014, Noise & health.

[50]  G. McArthur,et al.  Validation of the Emotiv EPOC® EEG gaming system for measuring research quality auditory ERPs , 2013, PeerJ.

[51]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Suppressed alpha oscillations predict intelligibility of speech and its acoustic details. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  Gurjit Singh,et al.  Effects of Age on Auditory and Cognitive Processing: Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting and Audiologic Rehabilitation , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[53]  Björn Herrmann,et al.  Neural Alpha Dynamics in Younger and Older Listeners Reflect Acoustic Challenges and Predictive Benefits , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cognitive Load During Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[55]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[56]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[57]  Perceptual Effort and Apparent Cognitive Decline: Implications for Audiologic Rehabilitation , 2006 .

[58]  Matthew E. Wolak,et al.  Guidelines for estimating repeatability , 2012 .

[59]  Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al.  The eye as a window to the listening brain: Neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load , 2014, NeuroImage.

[60]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Pupil Dilation Uncovers Extra Listening Effort in the Presence of a Single-Talker Masker , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[61]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Effects of memory load on cortical oscillatory activity during auditory pattern working memory , 2006, Brain Research.

[62]  J M Festen,et al.  Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilatation. , 1997, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[63]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Control-related systems in the human brain , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[64]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[65]  M. Marmot,et al.  When reciprocity fails: effort–reward imbalance in relation to coronary heart disease and health functioning within the Whitehall II study , 2002, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[66]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[67]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Cortical alpha oscillations as a tool for auditory selective inhibition , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[68]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[69]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[70]  Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al.  Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[71]  J. Beatty,et al.  Pupillometric signs of brain activation vary with level of cognitive processing. , 1978, Science.

[72]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[73]  Bruce A. Schneider,et al.  Effects of Senescent Changes in Audition and Cognition on Spoken Language Comprehension , 2010 .

[74]  B. Lyxell,et al.  Conceptions of working life among employees with mild-moderate aided hearing impairment: A phenomenographic study , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[75]  Rudy E. Ballieux,et al.  Cardiovascular and endocrine responses to experimental stress: Effects of mental effort and controllability , 1998, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[76]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Pupil Dilation and EEG Alpha Frequency Band Power Reveal Load on Executive Functions for Link-Selection Processes during Text Reading , 2015, PloS one.

[77]  S. T. Goverts,et al.  Hearing status, need for recovery after work, and psychosocial work characteristics: Results from an internet-based national survey on hearing , 2009, International journal of audiology.