Higher growth through the Blue Ocean Strategy: Implications for economic policy

Higher growth is a key goal of companies, governments, and societies. Economic policies often attempt to attain this goal by targeting companies of certain sizes that operate in specific industries and focus on a specific business activity. This approach to policy making has considerable shortcomings and seems to be less than fully effective in increasing economic growth. We suggest a new approach to policy making that stems directly from the entrepreneurial perspective. This approach examines a successful business strategy framework – the Blue Ocean Strategy – to discover conditions for high growth. We test the propositions on empirical data for two cases of successful high-growth business, namely Slovenian gazelles and Amazon.com. The results reveal a gap between the macro level of economic policy making to achieve higher growth and the micro level of business growth. The findings call for a change in the focus of economic policies on specific size companies, industries, and business activities to intraindustry cooperation, collaboration between companies of different sizes, value innovation, and creation of uncontested markets.

[1]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence , 2010 .

[2]  R. Florida,et al.  The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America's Failure To Move From Innovation To Mass Production , 1990 .

[3]  W. Kim,et al.  Creating new market space. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[4]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[5]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs , 2009 .

[6]  J. Holmes,et al.  Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation , 2008 .

[7]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  How to use qualitative methods in evaluation , 1987 .

[8]  Jaime R. Marquez,et al.  International Comparisons of Productivity Growth: The Role of Information Technology and Regulatory Practices , 2004 .

[9]  Mateja Drnovšek Job Creation Process in a Transition Economy , 2004 .

[10]  G. Hamel Leading the Revolution , 2000 .

[11]  D. Faems,et al.  Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7 , 2008 .

[12]  R. Freeman Evaluating the European View that the United States Has No Unemployment Problem , 1988 .

[13]  G. Pisano Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution , 2006 .

[14]  R. Scapens Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods , 1990 .

[15]  R. Langlois,et al.  Innovation, Networks, and Vertical Integration , 1995 .

[16]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[17]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law , 2003 .

[18]  M. Wright,et al.  Agency, Strategic Entrepreneurship, and the Performance of Private Equity–Backed Buyouts , 2009 .

[19]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .

[20]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[21]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Industry Origins of the American Productivity Resurgence , 2007 .

[22]  Mojca Bavdaž,et al.  Achieving a response from fast-growing companies: the case of Slovenian gazelles , 2009 .

[23]  E. P. Michael Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[24]  C. Markides Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory* , 2006 .

[25]  Charles Steindel,et al.  Productivity: What is it, and Why Do We Care About it? , 2001 .

[26]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[27]  David J. North,et al.  The characteristics and strategies of high growth SMEs , 1995 .

[28]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation and Small Firms , 1990 .

[29]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[30]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Science, Technology and Innovation for Economic Growth: Linking Policy Research and Practice in "STIG Systems" , 2009 .

[31]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[32]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[33]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[34]  Ganesh Vaidyanathan,et al.  Using a value creation compass to discover “Blue Oceans” , 2009 .

[35]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  The evolution of manufacturing technology and its impact on industrial structure: An international study , 1989 .

[36]  F. Rutten,et al.  The evidence-based approach in health policy and health care delivery. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[37]  A. Kleinknecht,et al.  Flexible Labour, Firm Performance and the Dutch Job Creation Miracle , 2006 .

[38]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Winning through innovation , 1997 .

[39]  Kamel Mellahi,et al.  Does it pay to be a first mover in e.commerce? The case of Amazon.com , 2000 .

[40]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  HISTORICAL ALTERNATIVES TO MASS PRODUCTION: POLITICS, MARKETS AND TECHNOLOGY IN NINETEEN-THCENTURY INDUSTRIALIZATION , 1985 .

[41]  Amar Bhidé El déficit de juicio , 2010 .

[42]  Douglas J. Cumming,et al.  Government Policy Towards Entrepreneurial Finance: Innovation Investment Funds , 2007 .

[43]  Pamela Mueller,et al.  Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, Gazelles and Elephants , 2007 .

[44]  S. Lall Competitiveness Indices and Developing Countries: An Economic Evaluation of the Global Competitiveness Report , 2001 .

[45]  C. Sabel,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity , 1984 .

[46]  William Lazonick,et al.  Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor , 1992 .

[47]  C. Hillinger Output, Income and Welfare of Nations: Concepts and Measurment , 2003 .

[48]  A. Bikfalvi Innovation, entrepreneurship and outsourcing: essays on the use of knowledge in business environments , 2007 .

[49]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  Blue ocean strategy. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[50]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  Economic Growth in Europe: A Comparative Industry Perspective , 2010 .

[51]  P. Davidsson,et al.  Arriving at the high growth firm , 2003 .

[52]  P. Krugman,et al.  The age of diminished expectations : U.S. economic policy in the 1990s , 1992 .

[53]  M. Maccoby Why people follow the leader: the power of transference. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[54]  Y. Furukawa,et al.  The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better? , 2007 .

[55]  P. Krugman MAKING SENSE OF THE COMPETITIVENESS DEBATE , 1996 .

[56]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries , 2010 .

[57]  Birgitte Andersen,et al.  In search of a useful theory of the productive potential of intellectual property rights , 2008 .

[58]  Jacopo Di Cocco System of National Accounts 2008 , 2010 .

[59]  R. Rothwell Small firms, innovation and industrial change , 1989 .

[60]  Hans Landström,et al.  Pioneers in entrepreneurship and small business research , 2005 .

[61]  S. Majumdar Private Enterprise Growth and Human Capital Productivity in India , 2007 .

[62]  Haibin Wu,et al.  Ability-heterogeneity, entrepreneurship, and economic growth , 2010 .