Critical Comments on EEG Sensor Space Dynamical Connectivity Analysis
暂无分享,去创建一个
Luca Faes | Daniele Marinazzo | Jitkomut Songsiri | Frederik Van de Steen | Pedro A Valdes-Sosa | Esin Karahan | L. Faes | Daniele Marinazzo | P. Valdés-Sosa | J. Songsiri | E. Karahan | Frederik Van de Steen
[1] J. Knoester,et al. Scaling and universality in the optics of disordered exciton chains. , 2008, Physical review letters.
[2] J. Schoffelen,et al. Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG , 2009, Human brain mapping.
[3] Qiang Xu,et al. Small-world directed networks in the human brain: Multivariate Granger causality analysis of resting-state fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.
[4] Luca Faes,et al. Assessing Connectivity in the Presence of Instantaneous Causality , 2014 .
[5] Stefan Haufe,et al. Consistency of EEG source localization and connectivity estimates , 2016, NeuroImage.
[6] Conrado A. Bosman,et al. How to detect the Granger-causal flow direction in the presence of additive noise? , 2015, NeuroImage.
[7] Giulio Tononi,et al. State-Space Multivariate Autoregressive Models for Estimation of Cortical Connectivity from EEG , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
[8] Minfen Shen,et al. Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic signals , 2002, 6th International Conference on Signal Processing, 2002..
[9] A. Seth,et al. Granger causality for state-space models. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[10] Stefan Haufe,et al. A Simulation Framework for Benchmarking EEG-Based Brain Connectivity Estimation Methodologies , 2016, Brain Topography.
[11] Richard M. Leahy,et al. Electromagnetic brain mapping , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..
[12] Stefan Haufe,et al. Validity of Time Reversal for Testing Granger Causality , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.
[13] Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui,et al. Discrete, 3D distributed, linear imaging methods of electric neuronal activity. Part 1: exact, zero error localization , 2007, 0710.3341.
[14] Karl J. Friston. Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..
[15] Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al. A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.
[16] Karl J. Friston,et al. Estimating Directed Connectivity from Cortical Recordings and Reconstructed Sources , 2015, Brain Topography.
[17] Tohru Ozaki,et al. A solution to the dynamical inverse problem of EEG generation using spatiotemporal Kalman filtering , 2004, NeuroImage.
[18] J. Fermaglich. Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .
[19] Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al. Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data , 1995, NIPS.
[20] Karl J. Friston,et al. Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[21] M. Murray,et al. EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[22] Clemens Brunner,et al. Volume Conduction Influences Scalp-Based Connectivity Estimates , 2016, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[23] Luca Faes,et al. Measuring Connectivity in Linear Multivariate Processes: Definitions, Interpretation, and Practical Analysis , 2012, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.
[24] Helmut Ltkepohl,et al. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis , 2007 .
[25] Luiz A. Baccalá,et al. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.
[26] K. Müller,et al. Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. , 2007, Physical review letters.
[27] J. Geweke,et al. Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .
[28] E. Formisano,et al. Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest , 2004, Human brain mapping.
[29] K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al. Consistency of EEG source localization and connectivity estimates , 2016, bioRxiv.
[30] S. J. Grzybowski,et al. Cortical functional connectivity is associated with the valence of affective states , 2014, Brain and Cognition.
[31] Giulio Tononi,et al. Estimation of Cortical Connectivity From EEG Using State-Space Models , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[32] Sue F. Phelps. Evaluation of Information , 2018 .
[33] Motoaki Kawanabe,et al. Modeling Sparse Connectivity Between Underlying Brain Sources for EEG/MEG , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[34] Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al. Directed Transfer Function is not influenced by volume conduction—inexpedient pre-processing should be avoided , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[35] Tohru Ozaki,et al. Recursive penalized least squares solution for dynamical inverse problems of EEG generation , 2004, Human brain mapping.
[36] E. Vaucher,et al. Activation of the mouse primary visual cortex by medial prefrontal subregion stimulation is not mediated by cholinergic basalo-cortical projections , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..
[37] Stefan Haufe,et al. A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: A simulation study , 2013, NeuroImage.
[38] Karl J. Friston,et al. Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.
[39] Robert Oostenveld,et al. The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[40] Michael Eichler,et al. On the Evaluation of Information Flow in Multivariate Systems by the Directed Transfer Function , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.
[41] Maciej Kamiński,et al. Interactions Between the Prefrontal Cortex and Attentional Systems During Volitional Affective Regulation: An Effective Connectivity Reappraisal Study , 2015, Brain Topography.
[42] S. Bressler,et al. Granger Causality: Basic Theory and Application to Neuroscience , 2006, q-bio/0608035.
[43] Seungjin Choi,et al. Independent Component Analysis , 2009, Handbook of Natural Computing.
[44] Timoteo Carletti,et al. The Stochastic Evolution of a Protocell: The Gillespie Algorithm in a Dynamically Varying Volume , 2011, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.
[45] S. J. Grzybowski,et al. Effective connectivity during visual processing is affected by emotional state , 2014, Brain Imaging and Behavior.
[46] Luca Faes,et al. Wiener–Granger Causality in Network Physiology With Applications to Cardiovascular Control and Neuroscience , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[47] Thomas R. Knösche,et al. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses , 2015, NeuroImage.
[48] A. Seth,et al. Granger Causality Analysis in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[49] C. Granger. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .
[50] Yu Huang,et al. A highly detailed FEM volume conductor model based on the ICBM152 average head template for EEG source imaging and TCS targeting. , 2015, Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference.
[51] Karen O. Egiazarian,et al. Measuring directional coupling between EEG sources , 2008, NeuroImage.
[52] C. Granger. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .
[53] Mingzhou Ding,et al. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.
[54] Karl J. Friston,et al. Granger causality revisited , 2014, NeuroImage.
[55] M. Eichler. Causal inference in time series analysis , 2012 .
[56] Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen,et al. A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls , 2016, Front. Syst. Neurosci..