The Power of the Test for Treatment Effects in Three-Level Block Randomized Designs

Abstract Experiments that involve nested structures may assign treatment conditions either to subgroups (such as classrooms) or individuals within subgroups (such as students). The design of such experiments requires knowledge of the intraclass correlation structure to compute the sample sizes necessary to achieve adequate power to detect the treatment effect. This study provides methods for computing power in three-level block randomized balanced designs (with two levels of nesting) where, for example, students are nested within classrooms and classrooms are nested within schools. The power computations take into account nesting effects at the second (classroom) and at the third (school) level, sample size effects (e.g., number of level-1, level-2, and level-3 units), and covariate effects (e.g., pretreatment measures). The methods are generalizable to quasi-experimental studies that examine group differences on an outcome.

[1]  Patrick Leung,et al.  Power and Precision , 1999 .

[2]  David M. Murray,et al.  Design and Analysis of Group- Randomized Trials , 1998 .

[3]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[4]  K. Murphy,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests, Second Ediction , 1998 .

[5]  Robert D. Tortora,et al.  Sampling: Design and Analysis , 2000 .

[6]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Standard Errors and Sample Sizes for Two-Level Research , 1993 .

[7]  David M. Murray,et al.  Methods To Reduce The Impact Of Intraclass Correlation In Group-Randomized Trials , 2003, Evaluation review.

[8]  Spyros Konstantopoulos,et al.  The Power of the Test for Treatment Effects in Three-Level Cluster Randomized Designs , 2008 .

[9]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[10]  A. Winsor Sampling techniques. , 2000, Nursing times.

[11]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[12]  Howard S. Bloom,et al.  Learning More from Social Experiments , 2006 .

[13]  S. Chinn,et al.  Components of variance and intraclass correlations for the design of community-based surveys and intervention studies: data from the Health Survey for England 1994. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  Stephen Dubin How many subjects? Statistical power analysis in research , 1990 .

[16]  Jonathan L. Blitstein,et al.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[17]  Allan Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research , 2001 .

[18]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  The Effects of Small Classes on Academic Achievement: The Results of the Tennessee Class Size Experiment , 2000 .

[19]  L. Hedges,et al.  Intraclass Correlation Values for Planning Group-Randomized Trials in Education , 2007 .

[20]  Roger E. Kirk,et al.  Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). , 1995 .