Helical computed tomography of bowel and mesenteric injuries.

BACKGROUND The role of computed tomography in diagnosing hollow viscus injury after blunt abdominal trauma remains controversial, with previous studies reporting both high accuracy and poor results. This study was performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of helical computed tomography in detecting bowel and mesenteric injuries after blunt abdominal trauma in a large cohort of patients. METHODS One hundred fifty patients were admitted to our Level I trauma center over a 4-year period with computed tomographic (CT) scan or surgical diagnosis of bowel or mesenteric injury. CT scan findings were retrospectively graded as negative, nonsurgical, or surgical bowel or mesenteric injury. The CT scan diagnosis was then compared with surgical findings, which were also graded as negative, nonsurgical, or surgical. RESULTS Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 94% in detecting bowel injury and 96% in detecting mesenteric injury. Surgical bowel cases were correctly differentiated in 64 of 74 cases (86%), and surgical mesenteric cases were correctly differentiated from nonsurgical in 57 of 76 cases (75%). CONCLUSION Helical CT scanning is very accurate in detecting bowel and mesenteric injuries, as well as in determining the need for surgical exploration in bowel injuries. However, it is less accurate in predicting the need for surgical exploration in mesenteric injuries alone.

[1]  D. Breen,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of helical CT for detection of blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries. , 1998, Clinical radiology.

[2]  D. Breen,et al.  Blunt bowel and mesenteric injury: diagnostic performance of CT signs. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  M. Dowe,et al.  CT findings of mesenteric injury after blunt trauma: implications for surgical intervention. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  M. Eichelberger,et al.  CT in children with rupture of the bowel caused by blunt trauma: diagnostic efficacy and comparison with hypoperfusion complex. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  D. Gens,et al.  Rupture of the bowel after blunt abdominal trauma: diagnosis with CT. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  M. Federle,et al.  Bowel and mesenteric injury following blunt abdominal trauma: evaluation with CT. , 1989, Radiology.

[7]  G. Glazer,et al.  Computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. Their combined role. , 1989, Archives of surgery.

[8]  J. Weigelt,et al.  Evaluation of computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  A. Peitzman,et al.  Prospective study of computed tomography in initial management of blunt abdominal trauma. , 1986, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  R. Burney,et al.  Diagnosis of isolated small bowel injury following blunt abdominal trauma. , 1983, Annals of emergency medicine.

[11]  D. Oakes,et al.  Intestinal injuries missed by computed tomography. , 1990, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  D. Trunkey,et al.  Computed tomography in the diagnosis of blunt intestinal and mesenteric injuries. , 1987, The Journal of trauma.