The effect of PeakForce tapping mode AFM imaging on the apparent shape of surface nanobubbles

Until now, TM AFM (tapping mode or intermittent contact mode atomic force microscopy) has been the most often applied direct imaging technique to analyze surface nanobubbles at the solid-aqueous interface. While the presence and number density of nanobubbles can be unequivocally detected and estimated, it remains unclear how much the a priori invasive nature of AFM affects the apparent shapes and dimensions of the nanobubbles. To be able to successfully address the unsolved questions in this field, the accurate knowledge of the nanobubbles' dimensions, radii of curvature etc is necessary. In this contribution we present a comparative study of surface nanobubbles on HOPG (highly oriented pyrolytic graphite) in water acquired with (i) TM AFM and (ii) the recently introduced PFT (PeakForce tapping) mode, in which the force exerted on the nanobubbles rather than the amplitude of the resonating cantilever is used as the AFM feedback parameter during imaging. In particular, we analyzed how the apparent size and shape of nanobubbles depend on the maximum applied force in PFT AFM. Even for forces as small as 73 pN, the nanobubbles appeared smaller than their true size, which was estimated from an extrapolation of the bubble height to zero applied force. In addition, the size underestimation was found to be more pronounced for larger bubbles. The extrapolated true nanoscopic contact angles for nanobubbles on HOPG, measured in PFT AFM, ranged from 145° to 175° and were only slightly underestimated by scanning with non-zero forces. This result was comparable to the nanoscopic contact angles of 160°-175° measured using TM AFM in the same set of experiments. Both values disagree, in accordance with the literature, with the macroscopic contact angle of water on HOPG, measured here to be 63° ± 2°.

[1]  D. Lohse,et al.  On the shape of surface nanobubbles. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[2]  J. Ruberti,et al.  Rapid cryofixation/freeze fracture for the study of nanobubbles at solid–liquid interfaces , 2004 .

[3]  H. Schönherr,et al.  Closer look at the effect of AFM imaging conditions on the apparent dimensions of surface nanobubbles. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  Jun Hu,et al.  Investigation on the temperature difference method for producing nanobubbles and their physical properties. , 2012, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[5]  D. Lohse,et al.  Nonintrusive optical visualization of surface nanobubbles. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[6]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  The hydrophobic interaction is long range, decaying exponentially with distance , 1982, Nature.

[7]  A. Nguyen,et al.  Effect of alcohol-water exchange and surface scanning on nanobubbles and the attraction between hydrophobic surfaces. , 2008, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[8]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Boundary slip and nanobubble study in micro/nanofluidics using atomic force microscopy , 2010 .

[9]  Jun Hu,et al.  In situ AFM observation of BSA adsorption on HOPG with nanobubble , 2007 .

[10]  Guangming Liu,et al.  Improved cleaning of hydrophilic protein-coated surfaces using the combination of Nanobubbles and SDS. , 2009, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[11]  Vincent S J Craig,et al.  Physical properties of nanobubbles on hydrophobic surfaces in water and aqueous solutions. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[12]  Haiping Fang,et al.  The length scales for stable gas nanobubbles at liquid/solid surfaces , 2010 .

[13]  M. Brenner,et al.  Dynamic equilibrium mechanism for surface nanobubble stabilization. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[14]  S. Nakabayashi,et al.  Nitrogen nanobubbles and butane nanodroplets at Si(1 0 0) , 2008 .

[15]  H. Schubert Nanobubbles, hydrophobic effect, heterocoagulation and hydrodynamics in flotation , 2005 .

[16]  Shangjiong Yang,et al.  Removal of nanoparticles from plain and patterned surfaces using nanobubbles. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[17]  Phil Attard,et al.  Atomic Force Microscope Images of Nanobubbles on a Hydrophobic Surface and Corresponding Force-Separation Data , 2002 .

[18]  A. Boisen,et al.  Nanobubble trouble on gold surfaces , 2003 .

[19]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Nanobubbles on solid surface imaged by atomic force microscopy , 2000 .

[20]  Phil Attard,et al.  BUBBLES, CAVITIES, AND THE LONG-RANGED ATTRACTION BETWEEN HYDROPHOBIC SURFACES , 1994 .

[21]  Holger Schönherr,et al.  Ultrathin Films of Poly(ethylene oxides) on Oxidized Silicon. 2. In Situ Study of Crystallization and Melting by Hot Stage AFM , 2003 .

[22]  Haiping Fang,et al.  Detection of novel gaseous states at the highly oriented pyrolytic graphite-water interface. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[23]  Harold J W Zandvliet,et al.  Characterization of nanobubbles on hydrophobic surfaces in water. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[24]  Bene Poelsema,et al.  Surface bubble nucleation stability. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[25]  D. Lohse,et al.  Nanobubbles and micropancakes: gaseous domains on immersed substrates , 2011, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[26]  Haijun Yang,et al.  Effects of surfactants on the formation and the stability of interfacial nanobubbles. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[27]  W. Ducker,et al.  A nanoscale gas state. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[28]  H. Christenson,et al.  Cavitation and the Interaction Between Macroscopic Hydrophobic Surfaces , 1988, Science.

[29]  A. Wenger,et al.  Rupture of wetting films caused by nanobubbles. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  J. Ralston,et al.  Water and ice in contact with octadecyl-trichlorosilane functionalized surfaces: a high resolution x-ray reflectivity study. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[31]  Joachim Schoelkopf,et al.  Influence of surface topography on the interactions between nanostructured hydrophobic surfaces. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[32]  W. Ducker,et al.  Interfacial oil droplets. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[33]  G. Vancso,et al.  Quantitative mapping of elastic moduli at the nanoscale in phase separated polyurethanes by AFM , 2011 .

[34]  Harold J W Zandvliet,et al.  Temperature dependence of surface nanobubbles. , 2012, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[35]  Jun Hu,et al.  Removal of induced nanobubbles from water/graphite interfaces by partial degassing. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[36]  Xuehua Zhang,et al.  Nanobubbles at the interface between water and a hydrophobic solid. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[37]  M. Davies,et al.  Investigating the interfacial properties of single-liquid nanodroplets by atomic force microscopy , 2002 .

[38]  H. Schönherr,et al.  Contact angles of surface nanobubbles on mixed self-assembled monolayers with systematically varied macroscopic wettability by atomic force microscopy. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[39]  P. Hammond,et al.  Controlling the location and spatial extent of nanobubbles using hydrophobically nanopatterned surfaces. , 2005, Nano letters.

[40]  D. Lohse,et al.  Formation of surface nanobubbles and the universality of their contact angles: a molecular dynamics approach. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[41]  James W. G. Tyrrell,et al.  Images of nanobubbles on hydrophobic surfaces and their interactions. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[42]  C. Ohl,et al.  A direct observation of nanometer-size void dynamics in an ultra-thin water film , 2012 .

[43]  W. Ducker Contact angle and stability of interfacial nanobubbles. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[44]  C. Fan,et al.  Nanoscale multiple gaseous layers on a hydrophobic surface. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[45]  X. Zhang,et al.  Quartz crystal microbalance study of the interfacial nanobubbles. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[46]  Yayi Wei,et al.  Formation mechanism of 193nm immersion defects and defect reduction strategies , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[47]  J. Seddon,et al.  Surface nanobubbles as a function of gas type. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[48]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Kinetics of CO2 nanobubble formation at the solid/water interface. , 2007, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[49]  N. Ishida,et al.  Nano Bubbles on a Hydrophobic Surface in Water Observed by Tapping-Mode Atomic Force Microscopy , 2000 .

[50]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Coalescence and movement of nanobubbles studied with tapping mode AFM and tip–bubble interaction analysis , 2008 .

[51]  N. Maeda,et al.  Thermodynamic stability of interfacial gaseous states. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[52]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Atomic force microscopy measurement of boundary slip on hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and superhydrophobic surfaces , 2009 .

[53]  B. Klösgen,et al.  Nanobubbles and Their Precursor Layer at the Interface of Water Against a Hydrophobic Substrate , 2003 .

[54]  F. Xiong,et al.  Effects of tip-nanotube interactions on atomic force microscopy imaging of carbon nanotubes , 2012, Nano Research.

[55]  D. Lohse,et al.  Correlation between geometry and nanobubble distribution on HOPG surface , 2008 .

[56]  C. Ohl,et al.  Total-internal-reflection-fluorescence microscopy for the study of nanobubble dynamics. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[57]  U. Banin,et al.  Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy for Nanoparticle Sizing: Tip−Sample Interaction Effects , 2002 .

[58]  Harold J W Zandvliet,et al.  Knudsen gas provides nanobubble stability. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[59]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Reduced water density at hydrophobic surfaces: effect of dissolved gases. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  V. Craig Very small bubbles at surfaces—the nanobubble puzzle , 2011 .

[61]  K. Kjaer,et al.  Water in contact with extended hydrophobic surfaces: direct evidence of weak dewetting. , 2003, Physical review letters.