MAX-DOAS observations of aerosols, formaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide in the Beijing area: comparison of two profile retrieval approaches

Abstract. A 4-year data set of MAX-DOAS observations in the Beijing area (2008–2012) is analysed with a focus on NO2, HCHO and aerosols. Two very different retrieval methods are applied. Method A describes the tropospheric profile with 13 layers and makes use of the optimal estimation method. Method B uses 2–4 parameters to describe the tropospheric profile and an inversion based on a least-squares fit. For each constituent (NO2, HCHO and aerosols) the retrieval outcomes are compared in terms of tropospheric column densities, surface concentrations and "characteristic profile heights" (i.e. the height below which 75% of the vertically integrated tropospheric column density resides). We find best agreement between the two methods for tropospheric NO2 column densities, with a standard deviation of relative differences below 10%, a correlation of 0.99 and a linear regression with a slope of 1.03. For tropospheric HCHO column densities we find a similar slope, but also a systematic bias of almost 10% which is likely related to differences in profile height. Aerosol optical depths (AODs) retrieved with method B are 20% high compared to method A. They are more in agreement with AERONET measurements, which are on average only 5% lower, however with considerable relative differences (standard deviation ~ 25%). With respect to near-surface volume mixing ratios and aerosol extinction we find considerably larger relative differences: 10 ± 30, −23 ± 28 and −8 ± 33% for aerosols, HCHO and NO2 respectively. The frequency distributions of these near-surface concentrations show however a quite good agreement, and this indicates that near-surface concentrations derived from MAX-DOAS are certainly useful in a climatological sense. A major difference between the two methods is the dynamic range of retrieved characteristic profile heights which is larger for method B than for method A. This effect is most pronounced for HCHO, where retrieved profile shapes with method A are very close to the a priori, and moderate for NO2 and aerosol extinction which on average show quite good agreement for characteristic profile heights below 1.5 km. One of the main advantages of method A is the stability, even under suboptimal conditions (e.g. in the presence of clouds). Method B is generally more unstable and this explains probably a substantial part of the quite large relative differences between the two methods. However, despite a relatively low precision for individual profile retrievals it appears as if seasonally averaged profile heights retrieved with method B are less biased towards a priori assumptions than those retrieved with method A. This gives confidence in the result obtained with method B, namely that aerosol extinction profiles tend on average to be higher than NO2 profiles in spring and summer, whereas they seem on average to be of the same height in winter, a result which is especially relevant in relation to the validation of satellite retrievals.

[1]  Steffen Beirle,et al.  Inversion of tropospheric profiles of aerosol extinction and HCHO and NO 2 mixing ratios from MAX-DOAS observations in Milano during the summer of 2003 and comparison with independent data sets , 2011 .

[2]  Hisahiro Takashima,et al.  MAX-DOAS formaldehyde slant column measurements during CINDI: intercomparison and analysis improvement , 2012 .

[3]  Yugo Kanaya,et al.  Comparison of box-air-mass-factors and radiances for Multiple-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) geometries calculated from different UV/visible radiative transfer models , 2006, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[4]  Christian Hermans,et al.  Four years of ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of HONO and NO 2 in the Beijing area , 2012 .

[5]  Nicolas Theys,et al.  Evaluation of tropospheric SO 2 retrieved from MAX-DOAS measurements in Xianghe, China , 2014 .

[6]  R. Spurr.  LIDORT and VLIDORT: Linearized pseudo-spherical scalar and vector discrete ordinate radiative transfer models for use in remote sensing retrieval problems , 2008 .

[7]  S. Beirle,et al.  Cloud detection and classification based on MAX-DOAS observations , 2013 .

[8]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Impacts of Aerosol Shortwave Radiation Absorption on the Dynamics of an Idealized Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2013, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[9]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  Differential optical absorption spectroscopy , 2008 .

[10]  Pieternel F. Levelt,et al.  Ability of the MAX-DOAS method to derive profile information for NO 2 : can the boundary layer and free troposphere be separated? , 2011 .

[11]  H. Tanimoto,et al.  Validation of OMI tropospheric NO 2 column data using MAX-DOAS measurements deep inside the North China Plain in June 2006 , 2008 .

[12]  Jihyo Chong,et al.  Long-term MAX-DOAS network observations of NO 2 in Russia and Asia (MADRAS) during the period 2007–2012: instrumentation, elucidation of climatology, and comparisons with OMI satellite observations and global model simulations , 2014 .

[13]  Henk Eskes,et al.  Validation of urban NO 2 concentrations and their diurnal and seasonal variations observed from the SCIAMACHY and OMI sensors using in situ surface measurements in Israeli cities , 2009 .

[14]  M. Wenig,et al.  Regularisation model study for the least-squares retrieval of aerosol extinction time series from UV/VIS MAX-DOAS observations for a ground layer profile parameterisation , 2013 .

[15]  Maria Tzortziou,et al.  NO2 column amounts from ground‐based Pandora and MFDOAS spectrometers using the direct‐sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and application to OMI validation , 2009 .

[16]  Min Shao,et al.  MAX-DOAS measurements in southern China: retrieval of aerosol extinctions and validation using ground-based in-situ data , 2010 .

[17]  J. Burrows,et al.  Validation strategy for satellite observations of tropospheric reactive gases , 2014 .

[18]  B. Connor,et al.  Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments , 1999 .

[19]  Ryan D’Souza,et al.  Comparison of tropospheric NO 2 vertical columns in an urban environment using satellite, multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy, and in situ measurements , 2013 .

[20]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  MAX‐DOAS O4 measurements: A new technique to derive information on atmospheric aerosols: 2. Modeling studies , 2006 .

[21]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  Determination of aerosol properties from MAX-DOAS observations of the Ring effect , 2009 .

[22]  J. Hovenier,et al.  The polarized internal radiation field of a planetary atmosphere , 1989 .

[23]  R. L. Curier,et al.  The 2005 and 2006 DANDELIONS NO2 and aerosol intercomparison campaigns , 2008 .

[24]  H. Tanimoto,et al.  Validation of OMI tropospheric NO 2 column data using MAX-DOAS measurements deep inside the North China Plain in June 2006: Mount Tai Experiment 2006 , 2008 .

[25]  P. Yan,et al.  Corrigendum to "Tropospheric NO 2 vertical column densities over Beijing: results of the first three years of ground-based MAX-DOAS measurements (2008-2011) and satellite validation" published in Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1547-1567, 2013 , 2013 .

[26]  Renmin Yuan,et al.  Lidar-based remote sensing of atmospheric boundary layer height over land and ocean , 2013 .

[27]  R. Volkamer,et al.  Parameterizing radiative transfer to convert MAX-DOAS dSCDs into near-surface box-averaged mixing ratios , 2013 .

[28]  Min Shao,et al.  MAX-DOAS measurements of NO2, HCHO and CHOCHO at a rural site in Southern China , 2012 .

[29]  Yugo Kanaya,et al.  First retrieval of tropospheric aerosol profiles using MAX-DOAS and comparison with lidar and sky radiometer measurements , 2008 .

[30]  J. Hovenier,et al.  The adding method for multiple scattering calculations of polarized light , 1987 .

[31]  B. Dix,et al.  Development and characterization of the CU ground MAX-DOAS instrument: lowering RMS noise and first measurements of BrO, IO, and CHOCHO near Pensacola, FL , 2011 .

[32]  B. Dix,et al.  The CU ground MAX-DOAS instrument: characterization of RMS noise limitations and first measurements near Pensacola, FL of BrO, IO, and CHOCHO , 2011 .

[33]  Dominik Brunner,et al.  Eight-component retrievals from ground-based MAX-DOAS observations , 2011 .

[34]  R. Martin,et al.  Retrieving tropospheric nitrogen dioxide from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: effects of aerosols, surface reflectance anisotropy, and vertical profile of nitrogen dioxide , 2013 .

[35]  S. Beirle,et al.  Determination of tropospheric vertical columns of NO 2 and aerosol optical properties in a rural setting using MAX-DOAS , 2011 .

[36]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  MAX‐DOAS O4 measurements: A new technique to derive information on atmospheric aerosols—Principles and information content , 2004 .

[37]  F. Hendrick,et al.  A simple and versatile cloud-screening method for MAX-DOAS retrievals , 2014 .

[38]  Yugo Kanaya,et al.  Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO 2 and O 4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers , 2010 .

[39]  Clive D Rodgers,et al.  Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[40]  John P. Burrows,et al.  MAX-DOAS measurements of atmospheric trace gases in Ny- ˚ Alesund - Radiative transfer studies and their application , 2004 .

[41]  F. Hendrick,et al.  Multiple wavelength retrieval of tropospheric aerosol optical properties from MAXDOAS measurements in Beijing , 2010 .