Variability, constraints, and creativity. Shedding light on Claude Monet.

Recent experimental research suggests 2 things. The first is that along with learning how to do something, people also learn how variably or differently to continue doing it. The second is that high variability is maintained by constraining, precluding a currently successful, often repetitive solution to a problem. In this view, Claude Monet's habitually high level of variability in painting was acquired during his childhood and early apprenticeship and was maintained throughout his adult career by a continuous series of task constraints imposed by the artist on his own work. For Monet, variability was rewarded and rewarding.

[1]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1996 .

[2]  C. Golomb.  The development of artistically gifted children: Selected case studies. , 1995 .

[3]  B. F. Skinner,et al.  Selection by consequences , 1984, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  K. Pryor,et al.  The creative porpoise: training for novel behavior. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  E. Goetz.  The effects of minimal praise on the creative blockbuilding of three year olds. , 1981 .

[6]  A. Winston,et al.  Behavior Analytic Studies of Creativity: A Critical Review , 1985, The Behavior analyst.

[7]  D. Campbell.  Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. , 1960, Psychological review.

[8]  Claude Monet,et al.  Monet: Or the Triumph of Impressionism , 1996 .

[9]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest? , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity , 1994 .

[11]  P. D. Stokes.  Learned variability levels: Implications for creativity. , 1999 .

[12]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Detrimental effects of reward. Reality or myth? , 1996, The American psychologist.

[13]  Experimental studies in the training of originality. , 1960 .

[14]  E. Goetz.  A REVIEW OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSES OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN'S CREATIVE BEHAVIORS , 1982 .

[15]  J. Campbell,et al.  Modifying Components of "Creative Behavior" in the Natural Environment , 1978 .

[16]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[17]  Ronald A. Finke,et al.  Creative Imagery: Discoveries and inventions in Visualization , 1990 .

[18]  Jean E. Pretz,et al.  Can the promise of reward increase creativity , 1998 .

[19]  J. Glover,et al.  Procedures to increase some aspects of creativity. , 1976, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[20]  P. Balsam,et al.  An optimal period for setting sustained variability levels , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  M. Boden.  The creative mind : myths & mechanisms , 1991 .

[22]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .

[23]  G. Lockhead.  Cognition and Thought , 1966 .

[24]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Genius, Creativity and Leadership: Historiometric Inquiries. , 1984 .

[25]  J. Donahoe,et al.  Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[26]  A. Machado.  Polymorphic response patterns under frequency-dependent selection , 1994 .

[27]  P. Balsam,et al.  Effects of different acquisition procedures on response variability , 1999 .

[28]  M. Richelle,et al.  New developments in behavioral research. Theory, method and application Barbara C. Etzel, Judith M. Le Blanc and Donald M. Baer (Editors). Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJ, 1977. (Distributed by John Wiley, U.K.) vxii + 632 pp., US $27.50/£19.55, ISBN 0-470-991134-8 , 1981, Behavioural Processes.

[29]  D. Simonton.  Origins of genius : Darwinian perspectives on creativity , 1999 .

[30]  M. Boden.  The creative mind : myths & mechanisms , 1991 .

[31]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Genius, Creativity, and Leadership: Historiometric Inquiries , 1984 .

[32]  A. Neuringer.  Reinforced variation and selection , 1993 .

[33]  R. J. Weber,et al.  Inventive minds : creativity in technology , 1992 .

[34]  J. Falk.  Physiology and Behavior. , 1973 .

[35]  Lynn T. Goldsmith,et al.  Nature's Gambit : Child Prodigies and the Development of Human Potential , 1986 .

[36]  E. Winner.  Gifted Children: Myths And Realities , 1996 .

[37]  E. Peacock,et al.  When does reinforcement induce stereotypy? A test of the differential reinforcement hypothesis , 1986 .

[38]  A. Neuringer,et al.  Variability is an operant. , 1985 .

[39]  A. Neuringer,et al.  Reinforced variability in rats: Effects of gender, age and contingency , 1992, Physiology & Behavior.