The architecture of mutualistic networks as an evolutionary spandrel

Mutualistic networks have been shown to involve complex patterns of interactions among animal and plant species, including a widespread presence of nestedness. The nested structure of these webs seems to be positively correlated with higher diversity and resilience. Moreover, these webs exhibit marked measurable structural patterns, including broad distributions of connectivity, strongly asymmetrical interactions and hierarchical organization. Hierarchical organization is an especially interesting property, since it is positively correlated with biodiversity and network resilience, thus suggesting potential selection processes favouring the observed web organization. However, here we show that all these structural quantitative patterns—and nestedness in particular—can be properly explained by means of a very simple dynamical model of speciation and divergence with no selection-driven coevolution of traits. The agreement between observed and modelled networks suggests that the patterns displayed by real mutualistic webs might actually represent evolutionary spandrels.Mathematical modelling suggests that nestedness and other features of mutualistic webs are spandrels resulting from the creation of diversity through speciation-divergence dynamics.

[1]  R. Solé,et al.  Spontaneous emergence of modularity in cellular networks , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  J. Pitchford,et al.  Disentangling nestedness from models of ecological complexity , 2012, Nature.

[3]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  A Model of Large-Scale proteome Evolution , 2002, Adv. Complex Syst..

[4]  Steven W Kembel,et al.  Backbones of evolutionary history test biodiversity theory for microbes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Solé,et al.  Are network motifs the spandrels of cellular complexity? , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  The architecture of weighted mutualistic networks , 2012 .

[7]  K. Foster,et al.  The ecology of the microbiome: Networks, competition, and stability , 2015, Science.

[8]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  On nestedness in ecological networks , 2010 .

[9]  Ricard V Solé,et al.  Topology, tinkering and evolution of the human transcription factor network , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[10]  A. Vázquez.  Growing network with local rules: preferential attachment, clustering hierarchy, and degree correlations. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[12]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  Nested species interactions promote feasibility over stability during the assembly of a pollinator community , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[13]  F. Jacob,et al.  Evolution and tinkering. , 1977, Science.

[14]  Daniel W. Franks,et al.  Using social network analysis of mixed-species groups in African savannah herbivores to assess how community structure responds to environmental change , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[15]  R. Solé,et al.  Selection, Tinkering, and Emergence in Complex Networks - Crossing the Land of Tinkering , 2002 .

[16]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Self-Organization in Complex Ecosystems. (MPB-42) , 2006 .

[17]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[18]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[19]  A. Maritan,et al.  Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks , 2014, bioRxiv.

[20]  M. Vergassola,et al.  An evolutionary and functional assessment of regulatory network motifs , 2005, Genome Biology.

[21]  Wolfgang Banzhaf,et al.  Network motifs in natural and artificial transcriptional regulatory networks , 2002, Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry.

[22]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[23]  S. Navlakha,et al.  Travel in city road networks follows similar transport trade-off principles to neural and plant arbors , 2019, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[24]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity , 2009, Nature.

[25]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  COEVOLUTION AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  K. Christensen,et al.  Tangled nature: a model of evolutionary ecology. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  J. Montoya,et al.  Small world patterns in food webs. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[29]  Richard V. Solé,et al.  Self-Organization in Complex Ecosystems. , 2006 .

[30]  S. Ellner,et al.  Trait-Based Modeling of Multihost Pathogen Transmission: Plant-Pollinator Networks , 2019, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[32]  J. Cardy.  Renormalization Methods---A Guide For Beginners , 2004 .

[33]  S. Gould.  The Structure of Evolutionary Theory , 2002 .

[34]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[35]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of random networks , 2001 .

[36]  A. Vespignani,et al.  The architecture of complex weighted networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Samuel Johnson,et al.  Factors Determining Nestedness in Complex Networks , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  M. Lynch.  The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Complexity and fragility in ecological networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Solé,et al.  Extinction and self-organized criticality in a model of large-scale evolution. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[42]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  M. Loreau.  Linking biodiversity and ecosystems: towards a unifying ecological theory , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The smallest of all worlds: pollination networks. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[45]  L. Joppa,et al.  Modeling the Building Blocks of Biodiversity , 2013, PloS one.

[46]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[47]  Kazuhiro Takemoto,et al.  Heterogeneity in ecological mutualistic networks dominantly determines community stability , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[48]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Coevolution to the edge of chaos: coupled fitness landscapes, poised states, and coevolutionary avalanches. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[50]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[51]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  The ghost of nestedness in ecological networks , 2013, Nature Communications.