Irreversible conversion processes with deadlines

Abstract Given a graph G, a deadline t d ( u ) and a time-dependent threshold f ( u , t ) for every vertex u of G, we study sequences C = ( c 0 , c 1 , … ) of 0/1-labelings c i of the vertices of G such that for every t ∈ N , we have c t ( u ) = 1 if and only if either c t − 1 ( u ) = 1 or at least f ( u , t − 1 ) neighbors v of u satisfy c t − 1 ( v ) = 1 . The sequence C models the spreading of a property/commodity within a network and it is said to converge to 1 on time, if c t d ( u ) ( u ) = 1 for every vertex u of G, that is, if every vertex u has the spreading property/received the spreading good by time t d ( u ) . We study the smallest number irr ( G , t d , f ) of vertices u with initial label c 0 ( u ) equal to 1 that result in a sequence C converging to 1 on time. If G is a forest or a clique, we present efficient algorithms computing irr ( G , t d , f ) . Furthermore, we prove lower and upper bounds relying on counting and probabilistic arguments. For special choices of t d and f, the parameter irr ( G , t d , f ) coincides with well-known graph parameters related to domination and independence in graphs.

[1]  Stéphane Pérennes,et al.  The Power of Small Coalitions in Graphs , 2003, Discret. Appl. Math..

[2]  L. O’Driscoll Gene Expression Profiling , 2011, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[3]  Fred S. Roberts,et al.  Irreversible k-threshold processes: Graph-theoretical threshold models of the spread of disease and of opinion , 2009, Discret. Appl. Math..

[4]  J. French,et al.  A formal theory of social power. , 1956, Psychological review.

[5]  Peter J. Slater,et al.  Fundamentals of domination in graphs , 1998, Pure and applied mathematics.

[6]  Noga Alon,et al.  The Probabilistic Method , 2015, Fundamentals of Ramsey Theory.

[7]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[8]  Nabil H. Mustafa,et al.  Listen to Your Neighbors: How (Not) to Reach a Consensus , 2004, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[9]  Zvia Agur Fixed Points of Majority Rule Cellular Automata with Application to Plasticity and Precision of the Immune System , 1991, Complex Syst..

[10]  Shay Kutten,et al.  Fault-Local Distributed Mending , 1999, J. Algorithms.

[11]  M. Jacobson,et al.  n-Domination in graphs , 1985 .

[12]  Jayme Luiz Szwarcfiter,et al.  Irreversible conversion of graphs , 2011, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[13]  Nicola Santoro,et al.  Optimal irreversible dynamos in chordal rings , 2001, Discret. Appl. Math..

[14]  David Peleg,et al.  Local majorities, coalitions and monopolies in graphs: a review , 2002, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[15]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random majority percolation , 2010, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[16]  Paola Flocchini,et al.  On time versus size for monotone dynamic monopolies in regular topologies , 2000, SIROCCO.

[17]  Svatopluk Poljak,et al.  On periodical behaviour in societies with symmetric influences , 1983, Comb..

[18]  Sui Huang Gene expression profiling, genetic networks, and cellular states: an integrating concept for tumorigenesis and drug discovery , 1999, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[19]  Jean-Paul Allouche,et al.  Notes on cellular automata , 2001 .

[20]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..