An Evidence-Based National Quality Measurement and Reporting System

Background.Evidence-based medicine and evidence-based guidelines are widely supported among physicians and other health professionals, although practice may still fall far short of the ideas contained in the concept. Insufficient attention has been given to using the concepts of evidence-based practice in the selection of measures, diffusion of innovations, and adoption of quality improvement (QI) techniques. Objectives.To describe in greater detail how evidence serves as a foundation for a national quality measurement and reporting system (NQMRS) and to consider the different types of evidence that will be used. The role of the NQMRS in adding to the evidence base is explored. Research Design.A descriptive, conceptual discussion. Results.Many different types of evidence are available for use in the NQMRS. The NQMRS could add substantial new evidence on how well different approaches to quality measurement, reporting, and improvement work and also expand the evidence base on the effectiveness of clinical interventions for which efficacy has been established. Conclusions.An evidence-based NQMRS will require substantial leadership from government and private entities. The gains from a greater focus on evidence are expected to be found in accelerating QI. Reliance on evidence-based approaches should not be used to stifle innovation.

[1]  Donald M. Berwick,et al.  Connections Between Quality Measurement and Improvement , 2003, Medical care.

[2]  E. McGlynn.  Selecting Common Measures of Quality and System Performance , 2003, Medical care.

[3]  E. McGlynn.  Introduction and Overview of the Conceptual Framework for a National Quality Measurement and Reporting System , 2003, Medical care.

[4]  Elizabeth A McGlynn,et al.  Establishing National Goals for Quality Improvement , 2003, Medical care.

[5]  E. McGlynn,et al.  A Research Agenda to Advance Quality Measurement and Improvement , 2003, Medical care.

[6]  Elizabeth A. McGlynn,et al.  Using Performance Measurement to Drive Improvement , 2003 .

[7]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Strategies for reporting health plan performance information to consumers: evidence from controlled studies. , 2002, Health services research.

[8]  E. McGlynn,et al.  What Cognitive Science Tells Us about the Design of Reports for Consumers , 2002, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[9]  N Freemantle,et al.  When is it cost-effective to change the behavior of health professionals? , 2001, JAMA.

[10]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Envisioning the national health care quality report , 2001 .

[12]  B. Pitt,et al.  The Effect of Spironolactone on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Severe Heart Failure , 2000 .

[13]  R H Brook,et al.  The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. , 2000, JAMA.

[14]  B. Pitt,et al.  The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P. Plsek.  Quality improvement methods in clinical medicine. , 1999, Pediatrics.

[16]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  Views from funding agencies. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. , 1998, Medical care.

[17]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[18]  Clifford Goodman,et al.  Format and Conduct of Consensus Development Conferences: A Multination Comparison , 1990 .