Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND Women with extensive dense breast tissue visible on a mammogram have a risk of breast cancer that is 1.8 to 6.0 times that of women of the same age with little or no density. Menopausal status, weight, and parity account for 20 to 30 percent of the age-adjusted variation in the percentage of dense tissue. METHODS We undertook two studies of twins to determine the proportion of the residual variation in the percentage of density measured by mammography that can be explained by unmeasured additive genetic factors (heritability). A total of 353 pairs of monozygotic twins and 246 pairs of dizygotic twins were recruited from the Australian Twin Registry, and 218 pairs of monozygotic twins and 134 pairs of dizygotic twins were recruited in Canada and the United States. Information on putative determinants of breast density was obtained by questionnaire. Mammograms were digitized, randomly ordered, and read by a blinded investigator. RESULTS After adjustment for age and measured covariates, the correlation coefficient for the percentage of dense tissue was 0.61 for monozygotic pairs in Australia, 0.67 for monozygotic pairs in North America, 0.25 for dizygotic pairs in Australia, and 0.27 for dizygotic pairs in North America. According to the classic twin model, heritability (the proportion of variants attributable to additive genetic factors) accounted for 60 percent of the variation in density (95 percent confidence interval, 54 to 66) in Australian twins, 67 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 59 to 75) in North American twins, and 63 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 59 to 67) in all twins studied. CONCLUSIONS These results show that the population variation in the percentage of dense tissue on mammography at a given age has high heritability. Because mammographic density is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, finding the genes responsible for this phenotype could be important for understanding the causes of the disease.

[1]  E. Fishell,et al.  Radio-free America: what to do with the waste. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  T. Sellers,et al.  Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States) , 2000, Cancer Causes & Control.

[3]  M Moskowitz,et al.  Mammographic patterns as markers for high-risk benign breast disease and incident cancers. , 1980, Radiology.

[4]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  F Merletti,et al.  Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  L. Tabár,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns. Risk indicator for breast cancer? , 1982, JAMA.

[7]  A. Morrison,et al.  Diet, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[9]  D. Duffy,et al.  Twin studies in medical research , 1993, The Lancet.

[10]  R. Egan,et al.  Breast cancer mammography patterns , 1977, Cancer.

[11]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Factors associated with onset of menopause in women aged 45-49. , 1994, Maturitas.

[12]  M Lipkin,et al.  Genetic and nutritional modulation of colon cancer development. , 1996, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[13]  C. Byrne,et al.  Studying mammographic density: implications for understanding breast cancer. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  M. Yacoub,et al.  Sumatriptan and ischaemic heart disease , 1993, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  J. Wolfe.  Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.

[18]  S. Seal,et al.  Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Ikuko Kato,et al.  A nested case-control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States) , 1995, Cancer Causes & Control.

[20]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[21]  N. Boyd,et al.  Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[22]  J. Carlin,et al.  Familial aggregation of a disease consequent upon correlation between relatives in a risk factor measured on a continuous scale. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  R. Egan,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer. , 1979, Radiology.

[24]  T Carlile,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as a risk indicator for prevalent and incident cancer , 1978, Cancer.

[25]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Breast size and mammographic pattern in relation to breast cancer risk. , 1996, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[26]  I. Fentiman,et al.  Relationship of mammographic parenchymal patterns with breast cancer risk factors and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study. , 1990, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  N E Day,et al.  Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population‐based study , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.

[28]  J. Norbeck,et al.  Association between mammographic parenchymal pattern classification and incidence of breast cancer , 1980, Cancer.

[29]  J. Wolfe.  Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  N F Boyd,et al.  Growth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[31]  G. Giles,et al.  After BRCA1 and BRCA2-what next? Multifactorial segregation analyses of three-generation, population-based Australian families affected by female breast cancer. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[32]  S. Duffy,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programme , 1998, Journal of medical screening.

[33]  S Ciatto,et al.  A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience. , 1993, European journal of radiology.

[34]  J. Pankow,et al.  Genetic analysis of mammographic breast density in adult women: evidence of a gene effect. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[35]  P. Krook.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as risk indicators for incident cancer in a screening program: an extended analysis. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  M. King,et al.  Frequency of breast cancer attributable to BRCA1 in a population-based series of American women. , 1998, JAMA.

[37]  J. Hayward,et al.  The relation between radiological patterns of the breast and body weight and height. , 1982, The British journal of radiology.

[38]  A. Morrison,et al.  Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. , 1984, American journal of epidemiology.

[39]  J. Witte,et al.  Likelihood‐based approach to estimating twin concordance for dichotomous traits , 1999, Genetic epidemiology.

[40]  R. Fisher.  XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. , 1919, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[41]  J. Mathews,et al.  Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis , 1982, Annals of human genetics.

[42]  W. Willett,et al.  Plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding protein 3, and mammographic density. , 2000, Cancer research.

[43]  R N Hoover,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[44]  C. Standertskjöld-Nordenstam,et al.  Mammographic patterns in twin pairs discordant for breast cancer. , 1987, The British journal of radiology.

[45]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  G. Maskarinec,et al.  A case-control study of mammographic densities in Hawaii , 2000, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[47]  H. Goldsmith,et al.  A zygosity questionnaire for young twins: a research note. , 1991, Behavior genetics.

[48]  M. Hakama,et al.  Is a dense mammographic parenchymal pattern a contraindication to hormonal replacement therapy? , 2000, Acta oncologica.

[49]  R N Hoover,et al.  Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer , 1991, Cancer.

[50]  E. Spitz,et al.  Comparative diagnoses of twin zygosity by SSLP variant analysis, questionnaire, and dermatoglyphic analysis , 1996, Behavior genetics.

[51]  S. Brünner,et al.  The risk of developing breast cancer in relation to mammography findings. , 1984, European journal of radiology.

[52]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Familial influences on breast parenchymal patterns , 1980, Cancer.