Design and performance of spinal fixation pedicle screw system

Pedicle screw-rod bilateral constructions are extensively used in spinal fixation. In this study, the common cause for failure of bilateral constructions has been determined to be the high stress concentration at the rod–setscrew interface. In order to overcome this problem, a design modification has been made by using a supplementary part (shoe) between rod and setscrew. Performance comparison of the conventional design and modified design has been done by conducting static tests. Design modification has resulted in 11%, 27%, 42% and 31% improvements in axial gripping capacity, torsional gripping capacity, flexion/extension resistance and subassembly compression strength, respectively. The most outstanding achievement has been obtained in the fatigue life, which was extended by almost three times.

[1]  Chunhui Wu,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Trajectory Pedicle Screw versus Injectable Calcium Sulfate Graft-Augmented Pedicle Screw for Salvage in Cadaveric Thoracic Bone , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[2]  V. Deviren,et al.  The Effects of Rod Contouring on Spinal Construct Fatigue Strength , 2006, Spine.

[3]  S. M. Haddock,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of a Double-Threaded Pedicle Screw in Elderly Vertebrae , 2002, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[4]  C. Reitman,et al.  Physical Characteristics of Polyaxial-Headed Pedicle Screws and Biomechanical Comparison of Load With Their Failure , 2003, Spine.

[5]  T C Hearn,et al.  Insertional Torque and Pull‐out Strengths of Conical and Cylindrical Pedicle Screws in Cadaveric Bone , 1996, Spine.

[6]  R L Huston,et al.  Strength and fatigue resistance of thoracolumbar spine implants: an experimental study of selected clinical devices. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[7]  A. Quaile.  Spine disorders: medical and surgical management , 2010 .

[8]  Shing-Sheng Wu,et al.  Mechanical Performance of the New Posterior Spinal Implant: Effect of Materials, Connecting Plate, and Pedicle Screw Design , 2003, Spine.

[9]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  An instrumented implant for vertebral body replacement that measures loads in the anterior spinal column. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  A. Crawford,et al.  Intraoperative Techniques to Reduce the Potential of Set-screw Loosening in Long Spinal Constructs: A Static and Fatigue Biomechanical Investigation , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[11]  Peter Augat,et al.  Influence of thread design on pedicle screw fixation. Laboratory investigation. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[12]  Zhaomin Zheng,et al.  Effect of the Degree of Osteoporosis on the Biomechanical Anchoring Strength of the Sacral Pedicle Screws: An In Vitro Comparison Between Unaugmented Bicortical Screws and Polymethylmethacrylate Augmented Unicortical Screws , 2010, Spine.

[13]  W. Walsh,et al.  Multiaxial Pedicle Screw Designs: Static and Dynamic Mechanical Testing , 2004, Spine.

[14]  J. Buckley,et al.  The Fatigue Life of Contoured Cobalt Chrome Posterior Spinal Fusion Rods , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  孙常太,et al.  Mechanical and histological analysis of bone-pedicle screw interface in vivo: titanium versus stainless steel , 1999 .

[16]  G. Njus,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the holding power/stiffness of the self-tapping bone screws in normal and osteoporotic bone material. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  C. Pezowicz,et al.  Experimental investigation of durability of transpedicular screw - vertebra connection. , 2004, Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja.

[18]  C. Chao,et al.  Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: Biomechanical tests and finite element analyses , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  S. Chueh,et al.  Failure analysis of broken pedicle screws on spinal instrumentation. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Placing a bone graft more posteriorly may reduce the risk of pedicle screw breakage: analysis of an unexpected case of pedicle screw breakage. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  L. Nolte,et al.  Pull-out strength of pedicle hooks with fixation screws: influence of screw length and angulation , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[22]  J. Corin,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Systems in a Corpectomy Model , 1989, Spine.

[23]  H. An,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Three Different Types of C7 Fixation Techniques , 2011, Spine.

[24]  R. Xu,et al.  [Comparison study of biomechanical test among fixation techniques of three types screw of posterior approach for C2]. , 2009, Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology.