Design and evaluation of the MAMMI dedicated breast PET.

PURPOSE A breast dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) scanner has been developed based on monolithic LYSO crystals coupled to position sensitive photomultiplier tubes (PSPMTs). In this study, we describe the design of the PET system and report on its performance evaluation. METHODS MAMMI is a breast PET scanner based on monolithic LYSO crystals. It consists of 12 compact modules with a transaxial field of view (FOV) of 170 mm in diameter and 40 mm axial FOV that translates to cover up to 170 mm. The patient lies down in a prone position that facilitates maximum breast elongation. Quantitative performance analysis of the calculated method for the attenuation correction specifically developed for MAMMI, and based on PET image segmentation, has also been conducted in this evaluation. In order to fully determine the MAMMI prototype's performance, we have adapted the measurements suggested for National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2007 and NU 4-2008 protocol tests, as they are defined for whole-body and small animal PET scanners, respectively. RESULTS Spatial resolutions of 1.6, 1.8, and 1.9 mm were measured in the axial, radial, and tangential directions, respectively. A scatter fraction of 20.8% was obtained and the maximum NEC was determined to be 25 kcps at 44 MBq. The average sensitivity of the system was observed to be 1% for an energy window of (250 keV-750 keV) and a maximum absolute sensitivity of 1.8% was measured at the FOV center. CONCLUSIONS The overall performance of the MAMMI reported on this evaluation quantifies its ability to produce high quality PET images. Spatial resolution values below 3 mm were measured in most of the FOV. Only the radial component of spatial resolution exceeds the 3 mm at radial positions larger than 60 mm. This study emphasizes the need for standardized testing methodologies for dedicated breast PET systems similar to NEMA standards for whole-body and small animal PET scanners.

[1]  Keishi Kitamura,et al.  Development of a C-shaped breast PET scanner equipped with four-layer DOI detectors , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[2]  E. Anashkin,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a PEM Scanner Using the NEMA NU 4—2008 Small Animal PET Standards , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  Keishi Kitamura,et al.  Basic evaluation of a C-shaped breast PET scanner , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[4]  F Sánchez,et al.  Design and tests of a portable mini gamma camera. , 2004, Medical physics.

[5]  J. Benlloch,et al.  DOI measurement with monolithic scintillation crystals: A primary performance evaluation , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[6]  David A Mankoff,et al.  Evolving role of positron emission tomography in breast cancer imaging. , 2005, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[7]  Eva Negri,et al.  Monitoring the decrease in breast cancer mortality in Europe , 2005, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[8]  M. Tatsumi,et al.  Effect of patients' being prone during FDG PET for the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Hongdi Li,et al.  The Engineering and Initial Results of a Transformable Low-cost High-Resolution PET Camera , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  S. Cherry,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of a 0.5-mm lutetium oxyorthosilicate detector array for high-resolution PET applications. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography Camera: PEM Flex Solo II , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  Peter Bruyndonckx,et al.  A high-resolution PET detector based on continuous scintillators , 2005 .

[14]  Hongdi Li,et al.  The Engineering and Initial Results of a Transformable Low-cost Ultra-high Resolution PET Camera , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[15]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[16]  R. Cloutier Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. , 1989 .

[17]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  W. Oyen,et al.  Impact of Ge-68/Ga-68-based versus CT-based attenuation correction on PET. , 2007, Medical physics.

[19]  R. Coleman,et al.  Is quantitation necessary for oncological PET studies? , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  S R Cherry,et al.  Design and evaluation of an LSO PET detector for breast cancer imaging. , 2000, Medical physics.

[22]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  Measuring response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: methodological considerations , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  E. Hauth,et al.  Whole-body PET/CT-mammography for staging breast cancer: initial results. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  A. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Performance characterization of a new high resolution PET scintillation detector , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[25]  J. Benlloch,et al.  Dependency of Energy-, Position- and Depth of Interaction Resolution on Scintillation Crystal Coating and Geometry , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[26]  Laura Moliner,et al.  Attenuation correction without transmission scan for the MAMMI breast PET , 2011 .

[27]  Patrick L Chow,et al.  Attenuation correction for small animal PET tomographs , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Jean-Francois Pratte,et al.  A simultaneous PET/MRI breast scanner based on the RatCAP , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[29]  K. Kitamura,et al.  Development of a C-shaped breast PET scanner equipped with four-layer DOI detectors , 2008 .

[30]  Luigi Mansi,et al.  The growing importance of continuing medical education in nuclear medicine: the role of the European School of Nuclear Medicine , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[31]  R L Wahl,et al.  To AC or not to AC: that is the question. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  Antonio Javier González Martínez,et al.  Design and First Results of an Innovative and Dedicated Breast PET , 2012 .

[33]  A. M. Sendyk,et al.  Performance Figures and Images from the Therascan 3128 Positron Emission Tomograph , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[34]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[35]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[36]  T. Spinks,et al.  Correction for scatter in 3D brain PET using a dual energy window method. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  D. M. Parkin,et al.  Breast cancer mortality patterns and time trends in 10 new EU member states: Mortality declining in young women, but still increasing in the elderly , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[39]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  I. Mena,et al.  Review of imaging techniques for the diagnosis of breast cancer: a new role of prone scintimammography using technetium-99m sestamibi , 1994, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  I Kanno,et al.  Deadtime correction method using random coincidence for PET. , 1986, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Performance measurements for the PET/CT Discovery-600 using NEMA NU 2-2007 standards. , 2011, Medical physics.

[43]  Spencer L Bowen,et al.  PET characteristics of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner prototype , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  H. Murayama,et al.  A DOI-Dependent Extended Energy Window Method to Control Balance of Scatter and True Events , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[45]  C Nahmias,et al.  Single-photon transmission measurements in positron tomography using 137Cs. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  S. Meikle,et al.  Design and simulation of continuous scintillator with pixellated photodetector , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[47]  T. Lewellen,et al.  cMiCE: a high resolution animal PET using continuous LSO with a statistics based positioning scheme☆ , 2002 .

[48]  David J. Schlyer,et al.  Results from prototype II of the BNL simultaneous PET-MRI dedicated breast scanner , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[49]  A. Sebastia,et al.  Scanner calibration of a small animal PET camera based on continuous LSO crystals and flat panel PSPMTs , 2007 .

[50]  F Sánchez,et al.  Performance tests of two portable mini gamma cameras for medical applications. , 2006, Medical physics.

[51]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Initial Characterization of a Dedicated Breast PET/CT Scanner During Human Imaging , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[53]  S. Siegel,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a calculated attenuation correction for PET , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[54]  S J Dwyer,et al.  Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[55]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Optimization of injected dose based on noise equivalent count rates for 2- and 3-dimensional whole-body PET. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[56]  T R Nelson,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[57]  Yiping Shao,et al.  Simple charge division readouts for imaging scintillator arrays using a multi-channel PMT , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[58]  Mathias K. Fehr,et al.  Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET , 2003, European Radiology.

[59]  C. Carter,et al.  Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases , 1989, Cancer.