Twelve Tips on Implementing Multiple Mini-Interviews in a Hybrid Admissions Model

Background: Multiple mini-interviews (MMI) were proposed almost a decade ago as an alternate means of assessing medical school applicants. MMIs are similar to an OSCE (Objectively Structured Clinical Examination) in that applicants complete a series of brief encounters focused on non-clinical topics. Aim: To assist those considering the addition of MMIs with standard interviews in a hybrid admissions model. Methods: The tips are derived from personal experience with a hybrid model at one academic institution. Results: The twelve tips describe approaches for obtaining early faculty buy-in, designing a floor plan and timetable, aligning MMI content with the program mission and goals, conducting faculty training, developing contingency plans, managing applicants’ expectations, encouraging committee participation, promoting holistic review of each applicant, utilizing the benefits the model allows, changing scenarios periodically, studying the model, and sharing the lessons learned. Conclusion: It is hoped these suggestions are helpful to those considering a hybrid model for their institution.

[1]  P. Ravani,et al.  Are Female Applicants Rated Higher Than Males on the Multiple Mini-Interview? Findings From the University of Calgary , 2017, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  S. Gay,et al.  A Hybrid Interview Model for Medical School Interviews: Combining Traditional and Multisampling Formats. , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[3]  J. Cleland,et al.  How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review , 2016, Medical education.

[4]  Dana M. Dunleavy,et al.  Core Personal Competencies Important to Entering Students’ Success in Medical School: What Are They and How Could They Be Assessed Early in the Admission Process? , 2013, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  Dana M. Dunleavy,et al.  An Overview of the Medical School Admission Process and Use of Applicant Data in Decision Making: What Has Changed Since the 1980s? , 2013, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  D. Kirch Transforming admissions: the gateway to medicine. , 2012, JAMA.

[7]  Timothy J. Wood,et al.  Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores. , 2012, JAMA.

[8]  Michael P. Kelsch,et al.  Evaluation of an Interview Process for Admission Into a School of Pharmacy , 2012, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[9]  G. Norman,et al.  The Reliability and Acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview as a Selection Instrument for Postgraduate Admissions , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[10]  Richard Fuller,et al.  How to measure the quality of the OSCE: A review of metrics – AMEE guide no. 49 , 2010, Medical teacher.

[11]  T. Norris,et al.  Using decentralized medical education to address the workforce needs of a rural state: a partnership between Maine Medical Center and Tufts University school of medicine. , 2010, Rural and remote health.

[12]  R. Axelson,et al.  Rater and occasion impacts on the reliability of pre‐admission assessments , 2009, Medical education.

[13]  J. Lockyer,et al.  The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection. , 2008, Family medicine.

[14]  K. Eva,et al.  The effect of defined violations of test security on admissions outcomes using multiple mini‐interviews , 2006, Medical education.

[15]  G. Norman,et al.  The Relationship between Interviewers’ Characteristics and Ratings Assigned during a Multiple Mini-Interview , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  K. Eva,et al.  An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini‐interview , 2004, Medical education.

[17]  S. Markwell,et al.  Is test security a concern when OSCE stations are repeated across clerkship rotations? , 1996, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  Jenny Morris The value and role of the interview in the student admissions process: a review , 1999 .