More Than Adopters: Competing Influences in the Interlocking Directorate

This study explores the competing influences of different types of board interlocks on diffusion of a strategic initiative among a population of firms. We examine a broad social network of interlocking directors in U.S. firms over a period of 17 years and consider the likelihood that these firms will adopt a strategy of expansion into China. Results show that ties to adopters that unsuccessfully implement this strategy have a nearly equal and opposing effect on the likelihood of adoption as do ties to those that successfully implement the strategy. Ties to those that do not implement the strategy also have a suppressive effect on the likelihood of adoption. Furthermore, we examine a firm's position in the core-periphery structure of the interlocking directorate, finding that ties to adopters closer to the network core positively affect the likelihood of adoption. We discuss the implications of our study for social network analysis, governance, and internationalization research.

[1]  M. Ventresca,et al.  How Organizations Change: The Role of Institutional Support Mechanisms in the Incorporation of Higher Education Visibility Strategies, 1874-1995 , 2004 .

[2]  Vicki A. Freedman,et al.  Event History Analysis , 1991 .

[3]  M. Mizruchi.  What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[4]  Damon J. Phillips,et al.  Middle‐Status Conformity: Theoretical Restatement and Empirical Demonstration in Two Markets1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  D. Strang,et al.  DIFFUSION IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills , 1998 .

[6]  G. Davis.  Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network , 1991 .

[7]  Joel Podolny.  A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Yasheng Huang,et al.  Selling China: Foreign Direct Investment During the Reform Era , 2002 .

[9]  Thomas Heinze,et al.  Dynamics in the German system of corporate governance? Empirical findings regarding interlocking directorates , 2004 .

[10]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[11]  H. Greve.  Managerial Cognition and the Mimetic Adoption of Market Positions: What You See is What You Do , 1998 .

[12]  Downloaded from , 1997 .

[13]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[14]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Special Issue on Corporate Transformation in the People's Republic of China: Organization and Management in the Midst of Societal Transformation: The People's Republic of China , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Kazuo Yamaguchi,et al.  Event History Analysis. , 1992 .

[16]  Patricia E. Tweet.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[17]  S. Shortell,et al.  Top manager and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: a study of TQM in a public hospital system , 2001 .

[18]  Peter Sheridan Dodds,et al.  Information exchange and the robustness of organizational networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Eric Abrahamson.  Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations , 1991 .

[20]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Michael Useem,et al.  The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U. S. and U.K. , 1986 .

[22]  Balazs Vedres.  The Constellations of Economic Power: The Position of Political Actors, Banks and Large Corporations in the Network of Directorate Interlocks in Hungary, 1997 , 2000 .

[23]  Eric Thun,et al.  Changing Lanes in China: Foreign Direct Investment, Local Governments, and Auto Sector Development , 2006 .

[24]  Lilach Nachum,et al.  The persistence of distance? The impact of technology on MNE motivations for foreign investment , 2005 .

[25]  Shaomin Li,et al.  Determinants of Locations of Foreign Direct Investment in China , 2006, Management and Organization Review.

[26]  M. Boisot,et al.  From Fiefs to Clans and Network Capitalism: Explaining China's Emerging Economic Order , 1996 .

[27]  V. Nee.  Organizational Dynamics of Market Transition: Hybrid Forms, Property Rights, and Mixed Economy in China , 1992 .

[28]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Bigger and safer: the diffusion of competitive advantage , 2009 .

[29]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  Internationalization and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure , 1998 .

[30]  D. Watts.  Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: Network Models and Methods for Studying the Diffusion of Innovations , 2005 .

[32]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[33]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[34]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Modeling International Expansion , 2007 .

[35]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[36]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Network Conditions for Organizational Change , 2003 .

[37]  Edward Levitas,et al.  Special Issue on Corporate Transformation in the People's Republic of China: The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economies: China vs. Russia , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[38]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[39]  Mark Newman,et al.  The structure and function of networks , 2002 .

[40]  Anja Tuschke,et al.  The Adoption Of Institutionally Contested Organizational Practices: The Emergence Of Stock Option Pay In Germany , 2007 .

[41]  Johannes Meier,et al.  "Second Generation" MNCs in China , 1993 .

[42]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Second-Order Imitation: Uncovering Latent Effects of Board Network Ties , 2001 .

[43]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  P. Engardio.  A new world economy , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[45]  Hugh M. O'Neill,et al.  Patterns in the Diffusion of Strategies Across Organizations: Insights from the Innovation Diffusion Literature , 1998 .

[46]  William B. Fredenberger,et al.  Women On Boards Of Directors: Effects On Firm Social Performance In The Basic Materials And Financial Services Sectors , 2011 .

[47]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  When Do Interlocks Matter?: Alternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence , 1998 .

[48]  Pamela R. Haunschild.  Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity , 1993 .

[49]  Brian K. Boyd,et al.  The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: implications for CEO compensation , 2001 .

[50]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Event History Analysis : Regression for Longitudinal Event Data , 1984 .

[51]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Yadong Luo.  Multinational Corporations in China: Benefiting from Structural Transformation , 2000 .

[53]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[54]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[55]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Strategic Context Of External Network Ties: Examining The Impact Of Director Appointments On Board Involvement In Strategic Decision Making , 2001 .

[56]  Michael Schwartz,et al.  Interlocking Directorates and Interest Group Formation , 1981 .

[58]  Samuel Cohn,et al.  Learning from Other People's Actions: Environmental Variation and Diffusion in French Coal Mining Strikes, 1890-1935 , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[59]  J. Singer,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis , 2003 .

[60]  P. Bonacich.  Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[61]  R. Burt.  Secondhand Brokerage: Evidence On The Importance Of Local Structure For Managers, Bankers, And Analysts , 2007 .

[62]  Brian L. Connelly,et al.  International Diversification: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2006 .

[63]  D. Hambrick,et al.  The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. , 1997 .

[64]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[65]  G. Davis,et al.  Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[67]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[68]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Director reputation, CEO-board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks , 1996 .

[69]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  BOARD STRUCTURE AND INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL RISK , 2002 .

[70]  D. Krackhardt.  Organizational viscosity and the diffusion of controversial innovations , 1997 .

[71]  V. Burris,et al.  Interlocking Directorates and Political Cohesion among Corporate Elites1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[72]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  FDI In China: What We Know And What We Need To Study Next , 2008 .